[QUOTE=One And Only Wanderers]
Are they all dozing through history, or is the curriculum at fault?
[/QUOTE]
I vote for sleeping, but I imagine the curriculum is equally unhelpful. I spent 10-odd years in British primary, preparatory and secondary schools, and had a history class in each of those years, and I can name the following PMs and their distinguishing characteristics:
Robert Walpole (the first PM, I think), Benjamin Disraeli (a good person to attribute a quote to if you can’t remember who really said it), Neville Chamberlain (gave Hitler Czechoslovakia), Churchill (even more quotable than Disraeli), Harold somethingorother from the '60s (famously said “you’ve never had it so good”), Edward Heath (probably said “you’ve never had it so bad”), Thatcher, John Major (Britain’s most boring man!), Tony Blair, and… the new fella, whose name I forget.
Of those, Walpole, Chamberlain and Churchill are the only ones I learned anything about in school, as far as I can recall - the others I know from books, TV or the internet.
By contrast, I had exactly one term/semester of American history, yet I can at least name probably 90% of the Presidents and give the career highlights for most.
I suppose to some degree it’s a problem of time compression - if you have to learn British history, you have to start with the Roman invasion at the very latest; so you’ve got to learn 2,000 years’ worth in the same timeframe that American history teachers are covering 200 years’ worth.