And I did find out that it was, apparently, still good law. Thank you for being able to shepardize, as I was unable to do so. I even said as much in that thread, when we tracked the matter down, as I recall.
Is that the same guy who is referred to in Shepardizing? (checks) Yep, it is. I know a few things, Bricker. I’m grateful for your patience, here, because I know that I know a few things, and the things I know may not fully add up here and there.
And I was not dismissing the argument. I was poking at a hole I seem to have found, and asking why it was or was not so. Now, if you’ll give me a little patience, I seem to recall the judge’s last order saying that it was not published. Lemme go check.http://thewheelerreport.com/releases/March11/0331/0331sumi.pdf
Further, I don’t think this guy is referring to Goodland at all.http://wispolitics.com/index.iml?Article=231799
Wait, no. Here’s the one I was looking for.http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/118839999.html
There’s the Goodland reference. Good eye, Bricker.
Okay. So the .pdf link, is the one that seems to be holding, and will be in place for about two months. So how can she do that, if Goodland is in force?
I still do not know why the judge ignored it. One would find that inexcusable in a judge.
Did you really have to do the Church Lady Chicken Dance?