With A Little Help From My Friends - you prefer the Beatles, or Joe Cocker?

Thank you for that link. I have wondered for years if Paul likes Joe’s version of his song. Great to hear that he does.

You got me, Pam died last year. But Joe was a good guy.

Yeah, I knew Cocker’s version first (especially–dating myself–the snippet used on The Wonder Years) and thought it was beautiful. When I heard the Beatles recording, I was stunned at how stupid and ugly it was. I don’t know, underdeveloped and sort of snickering?

Ringo is adorable, and he’s adorable performing this song in concert now; but the original recording does not hold a candle to Cocker’s arrangement. I guess (considering they’re nearly tied atm) there are a lot of contrarians on the Dope today.

I find much of the album pretty unimpressive, actually. :shrug:

You know, I really do like Ringo. One of my favorite memories is a concert with Ringo and Friends at the Greek Theater. He’s charming. But really, drad dog, I can’t believe you really think “Ringo had plenty of soul.” He has lots of stuff but soul is not in there.

He is/was a musician, an artist. If youre saying he had no soul then you must have no use for him at all.
Are you into Jam bands?

The Beatles couldn’t hear themselves after the mania started. Before that they played hundreds of hours in Hamburg and England. They honed the crap out of their stagecraft.
They became so popular that concerts became impossible, esp with the equipment of the day. But you wouldn’t know it by logging in here. I can’t recall Cocker-mania at the time. Must’ve been great, in your minds. Anyway that’s the Beatles reward for being great. No good art goes unsnarked.

Same here. I remember it from the theme song to Wonder Years, and I remember disliking it, even feeling mildly uncomfortable. I have a hard time listening to Cocker’s version all the way through.

When I heard the original version, I took to it immediately. I liked it. It felt understated but true, somehow.

I agree with drad dog here. Ringo had plenty of soul in his drumming. Cat can swing and just has inventive, musical, original drum parts. One of my favorite drummers.

Ringo had fantastic “soul” in that band, the way i see it, not only by powering the most popular music ever made, but just as a personality, singer, and the most popular one. He was the epitomy of scouse. He had a much tougher early life than any of them or any of the stones for that matter. He paid the dues to make a subtle version of a song. He didn’t need to spaz, and squeeze it out beyond what the music or chords call for, like someone we know. Cockers version is an abortion.

“The Wonder Years”?!?!?!

I’m a huge Beatles fan and I knew their version before Cocker’s. I’m pretty sure that I heard it before Cocker even did his version.

I voted for Cocker. There’s just no contest as far as I’m concerned. The Beatles were unbelievably talented, and like just about everything else they did, this song was magic. But what Cocker did with it was amazing.

Maybe we should also do a poll for She Came in Through the Bathroom Window.

I get that you have strong feelings, but your hyperbole makes it easy to dismiss everything you write, even the points that might otherwise be compelling.

Cocker’s version, absolutely no contest for me.

I like a lot of Beatles covers more than the original recording, but that one really takes the original and shows what it can be. Every musician on that record is putting in quite a performance.

Every musician on that record has turned the emoting up to 11, anyway.

I think some of you have a very different idea of soul than I have. Just being an artist or a musician does not give one soul in my eyes. In fact, the difference between Ringo and Joe Cocker gives a fairly good illustration of soul, in my opinion. I enjoy Ringo for what he is. But Cocker has soul.

Ehh, it might be 8 or 9 vs. the Beatles’ 1.5, but they have some dynamics and turn it up and down. It starts quieter and more reserved than the original. 11 is something like second half of Bridge Over Troubled Water.

…which would have been totally inappropriate as just the second song on the Sgt. Pepper album. The Billy Shears :wink: version works just fine in the context of that album, which is how it was meant to be heard.

Honestly, I’m not sure I’ve ever heard the Beatles’ original version.

And I really only know the Joe Cocker version because of The Wonder Years.

Once I figured out that Cocker’s was the Wonder Years version, I went with that. The Beatles version is just corny sounding, and very dated sounding.

I mean, I can even appreciate Leonard Cohen’s “Hallelujah,” but I don’t see how I can appreciate The Beatles version here.

Mr Cockers version ( The a Wedding Presents version is fun as well )