# Without answers, why religion?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [June 9, 2021, 4:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909 "2021-06-09T16:20:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2021, 11:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/121 "2021-08-25T23:34:58Z")

</div>

Except you can’t teach a fish to be a Christian, which is sort of the point. Atheism is the default human state. Religion is something we layer on top of it. I think that’s something useful to keep in mind.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thing.Fish](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thing.fish/32/9168_2.png) [@Thing.Fish](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thing.Fish)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2021, 11:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/122 "2021-08-25T23:45:48Z")

</div>

If atheism is the default human state, how come there were almost no atheists in the world until relatively recently, historically speaking?

The assertion seems to be that in the absence of specific religious training, it would never occur to anyone to believe in any sort of supernatural or divine phenomena. But in fact, such beliefs have existed in various forms in every known society in human history.

A recent major Pew survey to which I can’t conveniently link right now said that half of American children raised in secular homes become religious as adults. Even if the number were much less than this, it would seem to rebut the common atheist trope that religion only continues to exist because helpless children are brainwashed into believing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2021, 11:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/123 "2021-08-25T23:52:53Z")

</div>

**Modnote** : You revived a thread 15 days old so you could insult another poster in GD?

It is hard not to read this post as insulting **Exapno\_Mapcase**. Please do not do this again.

_This is just a guidance, not a warning. Nothing on your permanent record._

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thing.Fish](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thing.fish/32/9168_2.png) [@Thing.Fish](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thing.Fish)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 12:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/124 "2021-08-26T00:01:12Z")

</div>

Sorry, you’re right, that was inappropriate for GD.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Max\_S](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/46a35a/32.png) [@Max\_S](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Max_S)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 12:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/125 "2021-08-26T00:10:16Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> Atheism is the default human state.

I don’t think it follows. Just because an infant has no conception of God, does not mean atheism is the default or natural state of a fully developed human.

Infants have no conception of permanence (peek-a-boo!) either. It may well be that questions about the universe naturally lead to the idea of a God.

There was a quote from ~~_Sid Meier’s Civilization IV_~~ Cicero,

> Nature herself has imprinted upon all the idea of God.

~Max

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 12:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/126 "2021-08-26T00:42:43Z")

</div>

> [@Thing.Fish](#):
>
> You know the majority of Americans don’t belong to any religious congregation, right? You’re not actually a tiny, oppressed minority.

I don’t know that, because [it isn’t true](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_United_States).

> In 2019, Christians represent **65%** of the total adult population, 43% identifying as Protestants, 20% as Catholics, and 2% as Mormons. People with no formal religious identity at 26% of the total population.

That comes, wonderfully, from a [Pew survey](https://www.pewforum.org/2019/10/17/in-u-s-decline-of-christianity-continues-at-rapid-pace/) I _can_ conveniently link to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thing.Fish](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thing.fish/32/9168_2.png) [@Thing.Fish](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thing.Fish)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 1:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/127 "2021-08-26T01:17:27Z")

</div>

I said the majority don’t belong to a congregation. I didn’t say anything about what people self-identify as when asked by a pollster. If people aren’t a member of any religious organization, it seems reasonable to say they aren’t part of “organized religion”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 1:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/128 "2021-08-26T01:55:20Z")

</div>

> [@Thing.Fish](#):
>
> No, I believe that newborn babies have no beliefs.

> [@Miller](#):
>
> Which makes them atheists.

That all depends on how you define “atheist.”

But we’ve already had 1,256,982 threads that devolved into debates over definition of atheism; I don’t think we need another one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thing.Fish](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thing.fish/32/9168_2.png) [@Thing.Fish](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thing.Fish)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 2:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/129 "2021-08-26T02:13:43Z")

</div>

Actually, though, looking at your link I think I may have misremembered the variable being measured. It says that the majority now attend religious services “a few times a year or less”. This obviously isn’t the same as measuring formal membership in a congregation, but it seems to point to the same general conclusion, that “organized religion” in its conventional form is in decline. The outlook for religion in general is less clear.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 2:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/130 "2021-08-26T02:17:04Z")

</div>

> [@Max\_S](#):
>
> I don’t think it follows. Just because an infant has no conception of God, does not mean atheism is the default or natural state of a fully developed human.

Or you might say an infant has an excellent model for god, being someone who provides for all their needs by seemingly supernatural means. Manna from heaven, milk from a nipple, what’s the diff?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 2:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/131 "2021-08-26T02:23:01Z")

</div>

> [@Thing.Fish](#):
>
> I said the majority don’t belong to a congregation. I didn’t say anything about what people self-identify as when asked by a pollster. If people aren’t a member of any religious organization, it seems reasonable to say they aren’t part of “organized religion”.

There are a lot of other variables that make this kind of analysis pretty useless. Someone might believe in a god in a way that is not compatible with the churches near him. Someone might not want to go to a church with different political views or which she might think would press her to get more involved.  
From 14 - 17 I never went to Temple but I was still a believer.  
The Pew survey was not very good at identifying atheists as opposed to those without connections to religions. And in many places identifying as an atheist can get you into trouble, so someone might not want to identify even on a survey.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Keeve](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/f07891/32.png) [@Keeve](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Keeve)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 10:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/132 "2021-08-26T10:24:04Z")

</div>

I would agree that a newborn has no particular beliefs about God. But it is equally true that a newborn has no particular beliefs about other things too. For example, a newborn has no particular beliefs about gun ownership, equal rights, or style of government. These are all things that this newborn will pick up from their environment while growing, learning, and maturing.

So what’s the point that you’re trying to make, when pointing out that absence of belief is the default state of a human?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 12:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/133 "2021-08-26T12:44:54Z")

</div>

That all those things: beliefs about gun ownership, equal rights, style of government, _and_ religion, are things that are taught, not that are inherent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 2:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/134 "2021-08-26T14:12:42Z")

</div>

k9bfriender already said this, but I’ll emphasize the point.

The only people who interpret “everyone is born an atheist” as that infants are making a conscious point to disbelieve in a god are religionists erecting straw men, as in this page from [GotQuestions](https://www.gotquestions.org/born-atheist.html).

Any sensible reading of the phrase merely slots religion into a separate room from genetically innate - and governmentally protected - categories like gender, skin color, and sexual orientation (and I am aware that even those are not necessarily permanently fixed and can be willfully changed.)

Religion is a conscious choice, one that is easily changed at will or whim and can be done multiple times. Thing.Fish by their own admission gives a cite to this. Which is, I might remind everyone, is one cite more than they have provided for any of their other assertions.

The societal point is that having a religious belief should not be any more controlling over others than having a favorite sports team or YouTube channel. Anyone who announced loudly that Yankees fans get to write laws favoring Yankees fans and not only discommoding fans of all other teams but actively hostile to non-baseball fans would be laughed out of the room and denounced as an enemy of democracy. The same status should be placed on anyone who intends to write their religion’s beliefs into law.

Bottom line. Except out of politeness and consideration I, you, and everyone else in America should never have to hear a word about any individual’s religion or lack of one. That the word seeps into politics and government is an egregious wrong. That people are literally attacked for being the wrong religion or not having one undermines all pretense of being a civilized society.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DesertDog](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/desertdog/32/11503_2.png) [@DesertDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DesertDog)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 2:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/135 "2021-08-26T14:15:25Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> Anyone who announced loudly that Yankees fans get to write laws favoring Yankees fans and not only discommoding fans of all other teams but actively hostile to non-baseball fans would be laughed out of the room and denounced as an enemy of democracy.

I am so stealing this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 2:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/136 "2021-08-26T14:46:03Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> Any sensible reading of the phrase merely slots religion into a separate room from genetically innate - and governmentally protected - categories like gender, skin color, and sexual orientation (and I am aware that even those are not necessarily permanently fixed and can be willfully changed.)
> 
> Religion is a conscious choice, one that is easily changed at will or whim and can be done multiple times.

I don’t know whether we can say that a newborn baby has a sexual orientation, or only a predisposition to one: the seed of what will become a sexual orientation when the baby gets older.

As I understand it, there’s some evidence that humans are born with a predisposition to believe, or to be religious, and this is perhaps stronger in some people than in others—though it’s certainly not a settled issue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johanna](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johanna/32/8318_2.png) [@Johanna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johanna)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 3:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/137 "2021-08-26T15:04:35Z")

</div>

~~All~~ Some hail Prophet Heisenberg!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johanna](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johanna/32/8318_2.png) [@Johanna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johanna)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/138 "2021-08-26T15:44:35Z")

</div>

> [@filmore](#):
>
> I don’t think that the creators of the religion created the god for that purpose. Likely they themselves were confused about the universe and how humans came to be and imagined a “god” who did it all. Then it became convenient to use that god to be the moral enforcer for whatever moral foundation the society decided on.

That’s what is called the Axial Age. Circa 600 BC when people started to conclude that the force of the universe cared about human morality in addition to throwing thunderbolts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Keeve](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/f07891/32.png) [@Keeve](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Keeve)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/139 "2021-08-26T16:10:08Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> Religion is a conscious choice, one that is easily changed at will or whim and can be done multiple times.

For some people, it is easy to change their choice of religion. Certainly there are some who have done it multiple times. But to say that it is “easily changed at will or whim” is way too broad of a generalization. People whose beliefs are strong and deep will not change those beliefs so easily. (Citation: People throughout history who were offered the choice of converting or death, and chose death.)

It might be compared to one’s political views. Someone who very strongly believes in the [insert political party here] way of running things might possibly change to another view, but only with very serious thought, and not on a whim.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2021, 4:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909/140 "2021-08-26T16:21:00Z")

</div>

Sorry, no. Some people are firmly convinced in the most ludicrous conspiracy theories and will never change their minds about them. We do not privilege them just because they are stubborn. Religion is a choice, just as being a flat-earther is a choice. You may see a difference in their legitimacy (others may not) but there is no possible argument that they are in different categories.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909.md?page=6)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/without-answers-why-religion/943909.md?page=8)
