# Woman claims to be Azaria "That dingo ate my baby!" Chamberlain

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [August 26, 2005, 2:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725 "2005-08-26T14:04:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 18\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Helen\_s\_Eidolon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8edcca/32.png) [@Helen\_s\_Eidolon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Helen_s_Eidolon)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2005, 4:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/61 "2005-08-28T04:18:43Z")

</div>

Sorry for the hijack, but I all of a sudden recognize your name, Sarah. I just finished the book today.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sarah\_Woodruff](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/df788c/32.png) [@Sarah\_Woodruff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sarah_Woodruff)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2005, 4:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/62 "2005-08-28T04:23:11Z")

</div>

Heh. Thankyou! Most people assume I’m dumb enough to have signed up to a message board under my real, birth name. No! It’s a cultural reference like everyone else’s!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cicero](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cicero/32/3594_2.png) [@Cicero](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cicero)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2005, 5:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/63 "2005-08-28T05:32:10Z")

</div>

She looks more like Mick Jaggers love child than Azaria Chamberlain.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ice\_Wolf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/dfb087/32.png) [@Ice\_Wolf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ice_Wolf)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2005, 6:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/64 "2005-08-28T06:09:28Z")

</div>

Wonder what the _other_ photos of her look like – and whether that was just a bit of a media “Ha ha, look at the weirdo!” jack-up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2005, 6:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/65 "2005-08-28T06:37:22Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> She’s 25? She looks more like 45!

Well, being Charles Augustus Lindbergh would’ve required her to be a 75 years old man.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2005, 9:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/66 "2005-08-28T09:13:52Z")

</div>

> [@TheLoadedDog](#):
>
> …to rumours that “Azaria” (not a safe Aussie name like Sally or something) meant “death in the wilderness”.

Just in case you were wondering, “Azaria” is Hebrew for “God’s Help” or “Aided by God.” It’s a common Jewish family name.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cabdude](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/58956e/32.png) [@cabdude](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cabdude)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2005, 9:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/67 "2005-08-28T09:18:42Z")

</div>

> [@Sarah Woodruff](#):
>
> It don’t mean a thing if you ain’t got that evidence.
> 
> By the way, the Northern Territory is not subject to British Law. It’s subject to the Criminal Code of the Northern Territory, oddly enough.

Ah, yes I know that. But the Criminal Code of the Northern Territory didn’t spontaneously write itself, oddly enough. And it has it’s roots not in French Law, but British Law, as do the criminal codes of all Australian States and Territories. But thanks for taking me so literally. Once again, IANAL. Perhaps one can come along and clarify this point for us.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TheLoadedDog](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/35a633/32.png) [@TheLoadedDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TheLoadedDog)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2005, 9:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/68 "2005-08-28T09:23:12Z")

</div>

> [@Alessan](#):
>
> Just in case you were wondering, “Azaria” is Hebrew for “God’s Help” or “Aided by God.” It’s a common Jewish family name.

Sure, but that didn’t stop the local tabloid press (not a hugely common name in this part of the world), and many people swallowed it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Iguana\_Boy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/ed655f/32.png) [@Iguana\_Boy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Iguana_Boy)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2005, 11:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/69 "2005-08-28T11:41:08Z")

</div>

> [@cabdude](#):
>
> IANAL, but I don’t think a body needs to be found to convict for murder under British Law.

Sorry, but this is one of my buttons - there is **no such thing** as British Law.

Britain is subdivided into different legal systems. Scots Law is entirely distinct from the law of England and Wales. Northern Ireland (I know - part of the UK, not Britain) is different again.

In Scotland (and I am pretty sure in the others too) there is no need to find a body to prove a murder.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AngelicGemma](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/439d5e/32.png) [@AngelicGemma](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AngelicGemma)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2005, 12:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/70 "2005-08-28T12:53:07Z")

</div>

Flashbacks to when she was 9 weeks old? Well _I’m_ convinced.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cabdude](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/58956e/32.png) [@cabdude](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cabdude)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2005, 1:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/71 "2005-08-28T13:23:25Z")

</div>

> [@Iguana Boy](#):
>
> Sorry, but this is one of my buttons - there is **no such thing** as British Law.
> 
> Britain is subdivided into different legal systems. Scots Law is entirely distinct from the law of England and Wales. Northern Ireland (I know - part of the UK, not Britain) is different again.
> 
> In Scotland (and I am pretty sure in the others too) there is no need to find a body to prove a murder.

So it’s the ‘B’ word you have a problem with? Ok, amend that to English law. I was merely trying to draw a distinction between the origins of Australian law and European, or American, or Abyssinian, or wherever the poster came from, law.

But my main point, and you support this, is that in NT law at that time, and to the present AFAIK, no body need be found in order to arrest, try and convict for murder.

IANAL. IAN even close to being AL.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Happy\_Lendervedder](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/happy_lendervedder/32/8488_2.png) [@Happy\_Lendervedder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Happy_Lendervedder)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2005, 7:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/72 "2005-08-28T19:16:13Z")

</div>

That absolutely can not be Azaria Chamberlain, for the woman pictured is clearly the offspring of Ms. Mary Grace Canfield, aka Ralph Monroe on ‘Green Acres.’

Hell that might just be a file photo of ol’ [Mary Grace](http://www.maggiore.net/greenacres/images/e151.jpg) herself.

Case closed,  
Happy

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sarah\_Woodruff](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/df788c/32.png) [@Sarah\_Woodruff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sarah_Woodruff)\
**Post date:** [August 28, 2005, 11:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/73 "2005-08-28T23:50:44Z")

</div>

> [@cabdude](#):
>
> So it’s the ‘B’ word you have a problem with? Ok, amend that to English law. I was merely trying to draw a distinction between the origins of Australian law and European, or American, or Abyssinian, or wherever the poster came from, law.
> 
> But my main point, and you support this, is that in NT law at that time, and to the present AFAIK, no body need be found in order to arrest, try and convict for murder.
> 
> IANAL. IAN even close to being AL.

I am a lawyer, and I am Australian, and the point I was making is that the NT has been subject to a separate legislative system to England and Wales since 1901. That’s all. No need to get aerated.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cabdude](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/58956e/32.png) [@cabdude](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cabdude)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2005, 11:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/74 "2005-08-29T11:29:52Z")

</div>

> [@Sarah Woodruff](#):
>
> I am a lawyer, and I am Australian, and the point I was making is that the NT has been subject to a separate legislative system to England and Wales since 1901. That’s all. No need to get aerated.

Then can you post some info on how under NT law no body is necessary to prove a case for murder? That is, after all, the salient point here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zebra](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/c0e974/32.png) [@Zebra](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zebra)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2005, 11:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/75 "2005-08-29T11:48:30Z")

</div>

They have done that in America.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2005, 2:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/76 "2005-08-30T14:07:47Z")

</div>

> [@cabdude](#):
>
> Then can you post some info on how under NT law no body is necessary to prove a case for murder? That is, after all, the salient point here.

Well, I started this argument with my throw-away line. I’m not a lawyer, but it seems clear to me that (in the NT) you can be found guilty of murder because it happened in the Lindy Chamberlain case. While her team of lawyers fought on a variety of issues, and eventually got the conviction quashed with new forensic evidence, as far as I know the issue of lack of Azaria’s body was not raised. (Except, perhaps, in the argument that all the evidence against Lindy Chamberlain was circumstantial, and that there was reasonable doubt about what happened to Azaria. However, obviously, the jury did not accept that argument.)

Before becoming a separate territory, the NT was part of South Australia, and South Australia was started as a British colony. So the NT inherited the English common law, via South Australia. Currently, the criminal law of the NT is given in [the Criminal Code Act 1983, as amended](http://notes.nt.gov.au/dcm/legislat/legislat.nsf/d989974724db65b1482561cf0017cbd2/edc68594ef318d2769256ff20005f5d1?OpenDocument) – though obviously that was not the law that appied to the alleged murder of Azaria, which took place in 1980.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snickers](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/5daacb/32.png) [@Snickers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snickers)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2005, 6:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/77 "2005-08-30T18:59:58Z")

</div>

> [@don't ask](#):
>
> I think you would struggle to find many Aussies who think Seventh Day Adventists are a cult and I’m pretty sure that Lindy got her compensation long, long ago.
> 
> And the woman in the story is definitely dingo ugly.

Hell, I was raised Seventh Day Adventist and _I_ think they’re a cult. Mostly mainstream Protestantism, to be sure, but man, there’s some wacky beliefs there, lemmee tell you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snickers](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/5daacb/32.png) [@Snickers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snickers)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2005, 7:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725/78 "2005-08-30T19:02:26Z")

</div>

But I’m not Australian, so we’re both probably right.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/woman-claims-to-be-azaria-that-dingo-ate-my-baby-chamberlain/318725.md?page=3)
