# Wonder Woman - Seen it (Open Spoilers)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [June 2, 2017, 6:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918 "2017-06-02T06:26:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 12:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/101 "2017-06-07T12:16:32Z")

</div>

Yes, but since this is in several ways heavily “inspired” by Captain America…so yeah they would make changes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ssgenius](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5ac83/32.png) [@ssgenius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ssgenius)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 12:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/102 "2017-06-07T12:27:27Z")

</div>

> [@Terminus\_Est](#):
>
> I think using World War I as the backdrop was an inspired choice. It’s the centennial of the Great War. In fact, exactly one hundred years ago, the Battle of Messines took place where the British recaptured Messines Ridge. The British were also in the early stages of Operation Hush, the ultimately unsuccessful campaign to capture the coast of Belgium. In about a week, the Germans will conduct the first successful heavy bomber raid on London. A little later, the first American troops will land in France.
> 
> The Second World War had some clear Bad Guys and Good Guys. I mean, who doesn’t want to go and fight Nazis? In the First World War, much as the French and the Brits would like to vilify the Germans, there wasn’t a clear line between good and evil. The movie used this to good effect by allowing Diana to think German General Ludendorff was the Big Bad driving the war when in fact Ares had disguised himself as the British spymaster.
> 
> The war in the Western Front especially was a giant meat grinder. Troops would hunker down in trenches. Periodically, the generals would send them over the top where they would be cut down by opposing machine guns. Even if an offensive was successful and you took the enemy trenches you’d have gained maybe 100 yards at best. The enemy would come back, probably drive you out of the occupied trenches, and you’d go back to your original trenches to do the whole thing over again. Both side ultimately developed tanks to cross No Man’s Land. In this movie, WW was the tank that allowed the British to break through. WW wouldn’t have made that big a difference in Second World War, which had real tanks and planes and ever more accurate artillery. Also, there’s some great symbolism in getting Wonder Woman to cross No Man’s Land.
> 
> We the viewers also know that the War to End All Wars was just a prelude to an even greater war to come. The troops fighting in the trenches then would become the commanders sending even more troops into battle. Ares was ultimately correct. If you wanted a war to demonstrate to the naive Diana the futility of fighting, World War I was the war to do it in.

Thanks - Very good analysis

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 12:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/103 "2017-06-07T12:28:23Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> Yes, but since this is in several ways heavily “inspired” by Captain America…so yeah they would make changes.

How is it inspired by Captain America, unless you’re talking about the original Wonder Woman comic book (for which I don’t know if CA was influential)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terminus\_Est](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/terminus_est/32/3087_2.png) [@Terminus\_Est](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terminus_Est)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 1:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/104 "2017-06-07T13:03:09Z")

</div>

Chris Nolan had better watch out when he releases _Dunkirk_ next month. He might get sued by Marvel since Batman appears on the beach. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 1:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/105 "2017-06-07T13:05:56Z")

</div>

I think WWII would have had less impact. As mentioned, Trevor says that they are fighting a global conflict, a “War to end all wars”. That’s an obvious cue that Ares is back and trying to destroy mankind.

Had Trevor said that they were fighting the SECOND World War and the Amazons remained blissfully unaware of the previous one a couple decades prior, it sounds as though this Ares thing goes away on its own. Or at least isn’t the existential threat that Diana assumes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ike\_Witt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ike_witt/32/283_2.png) [@Ike\_Witt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ike_Witt)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 1:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/106 "2017-06-07T13:37:12Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> How is it inspired by Captain America, unless you’re talking about the original Wonder Woman comic book (for which I don’t know if CA was influential)?

Wonder Woman debuted about 6-7 months after Captain America. I’m guessing that the idea for her character had been floating around for a while.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Son\_of\_a\_Rich](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/son_of_a_rich/32/5439_2.png) [@Son\_of\_a\_Rich](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Son_of_a_Rich)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 1:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/107 "2017-06-07T13:41:30Z")

</div>

I’m curious: did any of the sword wielding characters do the “twirling the sword over their head” thing prior to fighting?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![planetcory](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/planetcory/32/1032_2.png) [@planetcory](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/planetcory)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 1:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/108 "2017-06-07T13:48:01Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> Yes, but since this is in several ways heavily “inspired” by Captain America…so yeah they would make changes.

Wonder Woman’s comic debuted during World War 2. Her 1975 TV show was set during World War 2. If the movie was heavily inspired by anything, it was by her own history and affiliation with the war.

Captain America most likely inspired the shift to World War 1, though, yes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 2:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/109 "2017-06-07T14:57:13Z")

</div>

> [@Son\_of\_a\_Rich](#):
>
> I’m curious: did any of the sword wielding characters do the “twirling the sword over their head” thing prior to fighting?

Not that I recall.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steve\_MB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steve_mb/32/5339_2.png) [@Steve\_MB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steve_MB)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 3:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/110 "2017-06-07T15:14:09Z")

</div>

> [@Terminus\_Est](#):
>
> I think using World War I as the backdrop was an inspired choice. It’s the centennial of the Great War. In fact, exactly one hundred years ago, the Battle of Messines took place where the British recaptured Messines Ridge. The British were also in the early stages of Operation Hush, the ultimately unsuccessful campaign to capture the coast of Belgium. In about a week, the Germans will conduct the first successful heavy bomber raid on London. A little later, the first American troops will land in France.
> 
> The Second World War had some clear Bad Guys and Good Guys. I mean, who doesn’t want to go and fight Nazis? In the First World War, much as the French and the Brits would like to vilify the Germans, there wasn’t a clear line between good and evil. The movie used this to good effect by allowing Diana to think German General Ludendorff was the Big Bad driving the war when in fact Ares had disguised himself as the British spymaster.
> 
> The war in the Western Front especially was a giant meat grinder. Troops would hunker down in trenches. Periodically, the generals would send them over the top where they would be cut down by opposing machine guns. Even if an offensive was successful and you took the enemy trenches you’d have gained maybe 100 yards at best. The enemy would come back, probably drive you out of the occupied trenches, and you’d go back to your original trenches to do the whole thing over again. Both side ultimately developed tanks to cross No Man’s Land. In this movie, WW was the tank that allowed the British to break through. WW wouldn’t have made that big a difference in Second World War, which had real tanks and planes and ever more accurate artillery. Also, there’s some great symbolism in getting Wonder Woman to cross No Man’s Land.
> 
> We the viewers also know that the War to End All Wars was just a prelude to an even greater war to come. The troops fighting in the trenches then would become the commanders sending even more troops into battle. Ares was ultimately correct. If you wanted a war to demonstrate to the naive Diana the futility of fighting, World War I was the war to do it in.

Also, the way World War I originated in a series of individually small steps by all parties that painted everybody into a corner (as opposed to the origins of World War II as a result of clearcut acts of aggression by one side) was a better fit to the “sometimes people mess up on their own without needing some Big Bad Evil to make it happen” point.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quimby](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/22d042/32.png) [@Quimby](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quimby)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/111 "2017-06-07T16:10:11Z")

</div>

Plus poison gas being such an important part of the story, WWI made much more sense (although I suppose it is possible they went with poison gas because of WWI being the setting and not the other way around).

If they had gone with World War II (and I am glad they didn’t), the idea that Marvel could sue them is pretty ridiculous.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 4:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/112 "2017-06-07T16:30:34Z")

</div>

> [@Quimby](#):
>
> If they had gone with World War II (and I am glad they didn’t), the idea that Marvel could sue them is pretty ridiculous.

Agreed. There may have been some grumbling from Marvel fans accusing DC of ripping them off but so many comic heroes were created or came to fame during that era that it would be ludicrous to think that Marvel gets a legal lock on it even within the narrow confines of “superhero movies”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 4:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/113 "2017-06-07T16:36:31Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> How is it inspired by Captain America, unless you’re talking about the original Wonder Woman comic book (for which I don’t know if CA was influential)?

My point (which I did a poor job in getting across) ws that Wonder Woman shared many plot points with the original Captain America film from 2011.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 4:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/114 "2017-06-07T16:39:37Z")

</div>

> [@Steve\_MB](#):
>
> Also, the way World War I originated in a series of individually small steps by all parties that painted everybody into a corner (as opposed to the origins of World War II as a result of clearcut acts of aggression by one side) was a better fit to the “sometimes people mess up on their own without needing some Big Bad Evil to make it happen” point.

At that: the bit where Diana concludes that Ludendorff must be Ares – and so she makes a beeline for the guy, for to deliver her big fine speech before putting a sword in him? And then she looks around in stunned horror, slowly concluding that maybe she was wrong and maybe she should no longer help flawed men?

So in a WWII flick she’d – well, she’d be disappointed after killing _Hitler,_ right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSYoungEsq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c6cbf5/32.png) [@DSYoungEsq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSYoungEsq)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 5:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/115 "2017-06-07T17:36:52Z")

</div>

I saw it for the first time yesterday. It’s got more plot holes than a swiss cheese, and it’s got waaaaaaay too much of that Matrix-type CGI fighting stuff that for goodness sake _Shrek_ made fun of 16 years ago! (I half expected to see her flip her hair out of the way during some portion of the fighting). One thing I like about the Marvel pics is that they generally avoid that gimmick.

The main “plot” is pretty stupid, too. As it works out, Ares has somehow created the scene upon which humans are playing out the war (so presumably he’s had a hand in setting up the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente, not to mention stirring the pot in the Balkans). Now, he’s intent upon making certain that an armistice is negotiated, on the theory that what will follow at some point in the future will definitely destroy all mankind? And Wonder Woman is supposed to be helping him by ending the plot of Leutendorff to bomb London with a super-gas, which, of course, she would be doing anyway even if she wasn’t in league with him? But she tries to kill him, and succeeds, so as a result… there’s an Armistice? Who thought up that silly nonsense??? I think the whole thing was designed solely so that they could have the interesting twist that Leutendorff is not Ares (which was a good thing!), and that mankind isn’t “worth” fighting for. But it’s like someone took a story in which Leutendorff WAS Ares and everything makes sense (more or less), and then tried to figure out who else could be the baddy, and didn’t bother to start from scratch in making up the story. Even for a comic book plot, that’s pretty bad.

I liked Wonder Woman. I liked that they showed her slowly learning what her abilities really were. When she goes “over the top”, she doesn’t really know what she’s capable of. She makes it up as she goes. But geeze, all she has to do is that crossed Bracelets of Submission thing and it’s game over for the Germans trying to shoot her. And she already knows how to do that from Themyscira. And for goodness sake, haven’t we already seen the hide behind the shield while the machine guns rip bullets at you thing? Oh, yeah, Cap, maybe you’d better ask for some royalties. What, they couldn’t get a machine gun placed, oh, say, 15º to one side or the other to fire at her?

Then there’s the silliness of the “sniper” who can’t snipe, who apparently is in the movie for the sole purpose of showing Diana that humans have frailties. Does he make up for his failure by managing to snipe someone/something else? Does he do ANYTHING else in the movie remotely worth having brought him along in the first place? Does Steve Taylor KNOW he can’t snipe?? If so, why does he get to come along, for the singing? :rolleyes:

I’ve not watched any of the other DC efforts from the past 10 years. If this is a good one from that universe, well, wow. It’s an average movie at best. Some fun scenes. Slow development (enforced by the character-origin story’s complexity). Lousy plot. Overworked CGI scenes. Really well-done WW herself. Not worth the cost of the IMAX-3D ticket, really (another complaint: the 3-D didn’t really add anything to the movie at any point). I had more fun watching the admittedly tired 5th entry to the Pirates franchise a couple weeks back.

Bring on Spidey!!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 5:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/116 "2017-06-07T17:55:19Z")

</div>

> [@DSYoungEsq](#):
>
> As it works out, Ares has somehow created the scene upon which humans are playing out the war (so presumably he’s had a hand in setting up the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente, not to mention stirring the pot in the Balkans). Now, he’s intent upon making certain that an armistice is negotiated, on the theory that what will follow at some point in the future will definitely destroy all mankind?

Ares didn’t want the armistice signed. The gala event was the night before the signing, during which Leutendorff planned to gas various places and show the German command that they could win the war. Ares, as the British guy, tells Trevor to stay away from the gala supposedly out of concern that Trevor will spoil the armistice but really because he doesn’t want Trevor and Diana coming close to Leutendorff. The whole idea is that there wouldn’t be an armistice the next day after Leutendorff carries out his attacks that evening. WWI is winding down as everyone tires of the fighting and horror and Ares is trying to ramp it back up into a mankind-ending climax.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pieceoftheuniverse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/7993a0/32.png) [@pieceoftheuniverse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pieceoftheuniverse)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2017, 7:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/117 "2017-06-07T19:23:20Z")

</div>

> [@DSYoungEsq](#):
>
> The main “plot” is pretty stupid, too. As it works out, Ares has somehow created the scene upon which humans are playing out the war (so presumably he’s had a hand in setting up the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente, not to mention stirring the pot in the Balkans). Now, he’s intent upon making certain that an armistice is negotiated, on the theory that what will follow at some point in the future will definitely destroy all mankind? And Wonder Woman is supposed to be helping him by ending the plot of Leutendorff to bomb London with a super-gas, which, of course, she would be doing anyway even if she wasn’t in league with him? But she tries to kill him, and succeeds, so as a result… there’s an Armistice? Who thought up that silly nonsense???

Ares has been planning things for a while. He has layers all ready to go so that no matter what happens, he still wins.

Plan 1: Help humans develop more and better weapons, so the fighting continues.

Plan 2: Sabotage the armistice at the gala, so the fighting continues.

Plan 3: Pose as someone influential to writing the armistice, sabotage it so that it doesn’t hold, peace collapses and - you guessed it - the fighting continues.

He’s been doing Plan 1 since the beginning of time. No problem for someone who can teleport at will and whisper into the right people’s ears.

And the details of Plan 2 aren’t even his. He just rolls with it because it fits so nicely with Plan 1. Really, that’s all Leutendorff and Dr Poison. Maybe give them some pointers if they run into any hangups.

We know Plan 3 will work, because that’s (roughly) the universe we’re living in: the terms were so unfair to Germany that a direct line can be drawn between WW1 and WW2.

When Diana shows up, he sees an opportunity, and comes up with a couple of other plans:

Plan 4: Push Diana to the front, where she will see the horrors of war that man has wrought, lose faith in humanity, and join him in his quest to destroy all mankind.

Plan 5: In case Plan 4 fails, kill Diana.

Plan 4 would be nice (it’s good to have company at the end of the world), and it seems likely to him because it’s the conclusion he arrived at. To him, it’s the only rational choice. But just in case she is irrational … well, that’s what Plan 5 is for.

He sees no problem with Plan 5, because he easily took out all the other gods. Diana’s just one, untested, naive, simple demigod who doesn’t even reailze her potential. How hard could it be?

So when Plans 1, 2, 4, and 5 all fail, Plan 3 goes into effect, and the second world war happens. It’s no wonder that Diana is dejected and a little cynical in modern times. She’s had to go through the second world war and all the little skirmishes since, knowing that Ares’ effects still linger, that humans are fundamentally flawed. It works well as a prequel to “Batman v Superman,” because it goes a long way to explain why she hadn’t been heard of for a while.

> [@DSYoungEsq](#):
>
> I’ve not watched any of the other DC efforts from the past 10 years. If this is a good one from that universe, well, wow. It’s an average movie at best.

You have NO idea. The last few DC movies have been oh so terribly bad. This one shines, though, and I have to put it on my personal list as one of the top superhero movies thus far.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tangent](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tangent/32/3098_2.png) [@Tangent](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tangent)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2017, 12:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/118 "2017-06-08T00:11:59Z")

</div>

Just got back from seeing it and haven’t read through this thread yet, but wanted to get my initial reactions down.

_Wonder Woman_ is a very entertaining film. It delivers well on the action scenes, and it also has some heart to it. The first two-thirds of the movie–from Themyscira through to the battle at the German-occupied village–are great. I was a little let down at the end–mostly because the villains in the movie are kind of a muddled mess. The big boss battle at the end was okay, but I’d have preferred there be more interaction between Diana and Aries prior to that fight so that the conflict felt more… earned.

Gal Gadot is a star. The camera loves her, and she may or may not be a _great_ actress (not enough information to say), but she has loads of charisma and ‘presence’ on screen that just cannot be denied. I would say 70% of the success of this movie is Gadot, with 25% for the director Patty Jenkins, and I’ll throw a 5% bone to Chris Pine for being a good Steve Trevor. Or maybe give that 5% to whomever composed Wonder Woman’s rousing theme music–it kicks ass.

Wonder Woman’s involvement was by far the best thing in BvS, and this _Wonder Woman_ film is far and away the best of the DCEU movies so far.

When they do a sequel, will it necessarily be set in the modern day? She had said (in our ‘present’ time) that she left the world of man behind ‘100 years ago’ so would that preclude another period piece?

And do you think there’s any chance Trevor is still alive? Steve was about to shoot the bombs, but then it cuts away for a bit and we only see the plane explode from Diana’s perspective, right? Maybe he could have found a parachute and jumped out before the bombs detonated? Doesn’t explain why he wasn’t there at the end in London, but it’s a possibility. Though if Diana does just retreat to the island for the next 100 years, then I suppose it doesn’t matter as far as sequels go. Ooh, maybe in the Justice League movie the Flash could go back in time and rescue him at the last minute and bring him to the present?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSYoungEsq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c6cbf5/32.png) [@DSYoungEsq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSYoungEsq)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2017, 1:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/119 "2017-06-08T01:12:47Z")

</div>

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> Ares didn’t want the armistice signed. The gala event was the night before the signing, during which Leutendorff planned to gas various places and show the German command that they could win the war. Ares, as the British guy, tells Trevor to stay away from the gala supposedly out of concern that Trevor will spoil the armistice but really because he doesn’t want Trevor and Diana coming close to Leutendorff. The whole idea is that there wouldn’t be an armistice the next day after Leutendorff carries out his attacks that evening. WWI is winding down as everyone tires of the fighting and horror and Ares is trying to ramp it back up into a mankind-ending climax.

Not what I saw. Ares specifically tells Diana that the Armistice is designed to fail. He WANTS Diana to engage in a bloody orgy of destruction at the airfield where the gas is. That will stop the effort by Ludendorff to gas London. And if Ares wants the Armistice to fail, why is he in London trying very hard to see that it succeeds? He finances the effort to go find the gas production plant, after all. It’s the gala event he wants them to avoid because if they screw that up, it will kill the Armistice. But he wants them to succeed at the airfield.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![simster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/simster/32/1047_2.png) [@simster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/simster)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2017, 3:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918/120 "2017-06-08T03:29:14Z")

</div>

> [@DSYoungEsq](#):
>
> Not what I saw. Ares specifically tells Diana that the Armistice is designed to fail. He WANTS Diana to engage in a bloody orgy of destruction at the airfield where the gas is. That will stop the effort by Ludendorff to gas London. And if Ares wants the Armistice to fail, why is he in London trying very hard to see that it succeeds? He finances the effort to go find the gas production plant, after all. It’s the gala event he wants them to avoid because if they screw that up, it will kill the Armistice. But he wants them to succeed at the airfield.

sowing discord is an art.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918.md?page=5)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonder-woman-seen-it-open-spoilers/787918.md?page=7)
