# Wonderfully beautiful photograph.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonderfully-beautiful-photograph/349413>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [March 22, 2006, 8:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonderfully-beautiful-photograph/349413 "2006-03-22T08:42:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dnooman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/839c29/32.png) [@dnooman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dnooman)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 5:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonderfully-beautiful-photograph/349413/21 "2006-03-24T05:03:13Z")

</div>

Very pretty indeed. I wish I could make my brain stop shouting “It’s fake/CGI/a painting!” Some things are just too perfect.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dag\_Otto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/439d5e/32.png) [@Dag\_Otto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dag_Otto)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 5:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonderfully-beautiful-photograph/349413/22 "2006-03-24T05:48:43Z")

</div>

> [@AHunter3](#):
>
> OK, I want witnesses on this for the next time New Mexico is characterized as hot flat dry & treeless!

I’ve frozen my ass off elk hunting at 10,000 feet and 25 below zero in New Mexico. It certainly met none of those criteria at the time. But it was beautiful.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lavenderviolet](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/cdc98d/32.png) [@lavenderviolet](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lavenderviolet)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 6:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonderfully-beautiful-photograph/349413/23 "2006-03-24T18:33:01Z")

</div>

I love the photo!  
Having visited the southwest a few times, personally, I don’t think that hot/dry/treeless is such a bad thing, actually. I actually think the desert is quite lovely. When I saw that some homeowners in Vegas were trying to grow lawns, I thought, “Why bother? Just enjoy what you have here”. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zelie\_zelerton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/59ef9b/32.png) [@zelie\_zelerton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zelie_zelerton)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2006, 9:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonderfully-beautiful-photograph/349413/24 "2006-03-24T21:50:27Z")

</div>

You see that really skinny balloon over on the right? What’s going on with that? Why isn’t it all nice and fat like the others?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveG1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@SteveG1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SteveG1)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2006, 1:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonderfully-beautiful-photograph/349413/25 "2006-03-25T01:06:09Z")

</div>

That is a GREAT picture. I am now officially jealous.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stentor\_2.5](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bc8723/32.png) [@Stentor\_2.5](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stentor_2.5)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2006, 2:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonderfully-beautiful-photograph/349413/26 "2006-03-25T02:35:21Z")

</div>

> [@dnooman](#):
>
> Very pretty indeed. I wish I could make my brain stop shouting “It’s fake/CGI/a painting!” Some things are just too perfect.

If you look at the list of alterations he made, you’ll realize that it is fake/CGI. Okay, it’s not entirely fake, but it wouldn’t be up to journalistic standards either.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pulykamell](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pulykamell/32/3166_2.png) [@pulykamell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pulykamell)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2006, 4:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonderfully-beautiful-photograph/349413/27 "2006-03-25T04:34:09Z")

</div>

> [@Stentor 2.5](#):
>
> If you look at the list of alterations he made, you’ll realize that it is fake/CGI. Okay, it’s not entirely fake, but it wouldn’t be up to journalistic standards either.

Well, it wouldn’t be too far off either. Most of the corrections made are pretty basic. The only one I would consider journalistically suspect is the cloning of minor distractions. Some of the color work is a bit more aggressive than normal, but a typical photojournalist will use cropping, levels (or curves), color balancing, noise reduction, and selective dodging and burning on most photos.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wonderfully-beautiful-photograph/349413.md?page=1)
