# World Chess Championship Match 2018

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Created:** [November 11, 2018, 2:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334 "2018-11-11T02:18:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b5a626/32.png) [@glee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/glee)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2018, 8:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/21 "2018-11-12T20:12:52Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> I like the horsey one, it moves funny.
> 
> Sadly that silly comment possibly reflects my ability at chess. I like a game now and again but I’m setting no worlds on fire.

You’ll like these two anecdotes:

- Checkmate (ending the game by inevitable King capture) probably comes from the Persian\* ‘Shah mat’, which means ‘the King is dead’

- the Rook is probably named after the Persian ‘Rukh’, which means ‘chariot’ (they both move in straight lines)

\*now Iran

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> Still, I find these big match-ups fascinating. It is a game and event that was pretty much waiting for modern technology to catch-up. We now have instant and varied commentary with the ability to project relative game position strength and suggest potential upcoming moves. It all provides a wonderful backdrop to the simple theme of two blokes and a chess board.

Yes indeed.  
It shows how complex chess is that computers haven’t analysed the whole thing out (although there are databases that have analysed every possible position with 6 pieces and 7 piece endings will soon be complete…)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b5a626/32.png) [@glee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/glee)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2018, 8:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/22 "2018-11-12T20:20:16Z")

</div>

Game 3 drawn.

Carlsen was Black and reached a better ending, but Caruana held on.  
This is a tribute to Carlsen’s opening preparation, since games between grandmasters show a small but distinct advantage to White (about 55%.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2018, 8:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/23 "2018-11-12T20:52:43Z")

</div>

To be clear, is that “white wins 55% of games”, or “white wins 55% of non-drawn games”? Draws are common enough that the two are quite different.

As an aside, laymen are sometimes puzzled by the fact that chess matches have an even number of games. It’s both because draws are so common that there’s no particular advantage to having an odd number, and because the white advantage means you want the same number with each side as white.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![borschevsky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/97f17d/32.png) [@borschevsky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/borschevsky)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2018, 9:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/24 "2018-11-12T21:09:21Z")

</div>

It’s “white gets 55% of the available points”. The percentages are in the neighborhood of 35% white wins, 40% draws, 25% black wins; the exact numbers depend on which set of games you look at.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2018, 10:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/25 "2018-11-12T22:11:17Z")

</div>

> [@glee](#):
>
> You’ll like these two anecdotes:
> 
> - Checkmate (ending the game by inevitable King capture) probably comes from the Persian\* ‘Shah mat’, which means ‘the King is dead’
> 
> - the Rook is probably named after the Persian ‘Rukh’, which means ‘chariot’ (they both move in straight lines)
> 
> \*now Iran

I knew the first one but not the second, I love a little nugget of new trivia now and again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![borschevsky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/97f17d/32.png) [@borschevsky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/borschevsky)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2018, 2:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/26 "2018-11-13T02:25:41Z")

</div>

> [@glee](#):
>
> Carlsen was Black and reached a better ending, but Caruana held on. This is a tribute to Carlsen’s opening preparation

Carlsen himself was critical of his opening after the game, saying that white would have had a large advantage by trading rooks before bringing out his bishop, instead of playing Bd2 immediately. Caruana seemed to agree. The commentators agreed, but weren’t sure how much of an advantage was really there.

But of course, it’s worth considering match tactics, as the players may be trying to misinform each other.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2018, 2:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/27 "2018-11-13T02:30:42Z")

</div>

Indeed, the psychology of chess is not to be neglected. That was one of Kasparov’s greatest strengths, which put him under a slight handicap in the well-publicized matches vs. IBM.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![borschevsky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/97f17d/32.png) [@borschevsky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/borschevsky)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2018, 5:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/28 "2018-11-13T17:51:34Z")

</div>

Another draw in game 4 today, in quite a short game. The commentators expressed some confusion with a couple of the moves chosen, but these seemed to be minor details (above my level, at least), and the game was pretty equal throughout.

One thing to be aware of is that the colour pattern is reversed at the midway point of the match, so Caruana has white in game 5, and then Magnus gets two whites in a row.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boozahol\_Squid\_P.I](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/d9b06d/32.png) [@Boozahol\_Squid\_P.I](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boozahol_Squid_P.I)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2018, 7:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/29 "2018-11-13T19:59:38Z")

</div>

It’s also notable that all of these draws actually favor Carlsen. He’s known as a particular master of the rapid and (especially) blitz chess, while Fabi’s strength lies in normal chess. Another American Grandmaster (in a sport that is noted for its nationalism,) Hikaru Nakumura, actually said he hoped Carlsen kept his title because he didn’t feel the world champion should be someone with shortcomings in the faster formats.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmine](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jasmine/32/2964_2.png) [@Jasmine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jasmine)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2018, 8:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/30 "2018-11-13T20:16:50Z")

</div>

Don’t assume a draw necessitating the speed chess resolution. There is still a long way to go, and someone may have a trick up his sleeve yet.

Besides, if Carlsen really has a definitive advantage in that format, his challenger may feel forced to play wide open, risky chess before reaching that point. That could very well produce a winning game for someone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OldGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OldGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OldGuy)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2018, 8:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/31 "2018-11-13T20:38:54Z")

</div>

Who’d have thought that chess of all things would go the shootout route to break ties like soccer and hockey.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boozahol\_Squid\_P.I](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/d9b06d/32.png) [@Boozahol\_Squid\_P.I](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boozahol_Squid_P.I)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2018, 8:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/32 "2018-11-13T20:58:32Z")

</div>

> [@OldGuy](#):
>
> Who’d have thought that chess of all things would go the shootout route to break ties like soccer and hockey.

At least the rapid variations of chess are considered part of the game, unlike the shootouts you mention which are specifically exhibition events only used for tiebreaks.

Now, if they did Bughouse, or Chess960, that would be a bit more like a shootout.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DragonAsh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/db5fbb/32.png) [@DragonAsh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DragonAsh)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2018, 1:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/33 "2018-11-14T13:27:23Z")

</div>

The move for shorter championship matches may have started in the mid-80s - specifically the Karpov v Kasparov match in 1984.  
It’s one of the first big chess matches that I remember following closely; I was in my last years of high school at the time.  
It was a very long match, lots of draws. Karpov actually led early on, only to get worn down by Kasparov, and then was controversially halted with no winner declared.  
I have a book about it, autographed by Kasparov (Garry Kasparov on Modern Chess, Part 2: Kasparov vs Karpov 1975-1985).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DragonAsh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/db5fbb/32.png) [@DragonAsh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DragonAsh)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2018, 2:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/34 "2018-11-14T14:09:50Z")

</div>

Almost forgot to post that the most exciting news today was of [Caruana’s training notes being accidentally](https://www.chess.com/news/view/world-chess-championship-game-4-carlsens-english-nets-4th-draw-despite-release-of-caruanas-training-) revealed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmine](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jasmine/32/2964_2.png) [@Jasmine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jasmine)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2018, 2:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/35 "2018-11-14T14:47:59Z")

</div>

> [@DragonAsh](#):
>
> Almost forgot to post that the most exciting news today was of [Caruana’s training notes being accidentally](https://www.chess.com/news/view/world-chess-championship-game-4-carlsens-english-nets-4th-draw-despite-release-of-caruanas-training-) revealed.

“Accidentally”? If they say so … :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSYoungEsq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c6cbf5/32.png) [@DSYoungEsq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSYoungEsq)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2018, 6:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/36 "2018-11-14T18:10:00Z")

</div>

Oh, does that remind me of the days of accusations of things hidden in chair arms… 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b5a626/32.png) [@glee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/glee)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2018, 7:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/37 "2018-11-14T19:15:10Z")

</div>

> [@DragonAsh](#):
>
> The move for shorter championship matches may have started in the mid-80s - specifically the Karpov v Kasparov match in 1984.  
> It’s one of the first big chess matches that I remember following closely; I was in my last years of high school at the time.  
> It was a very long match, lots of draws. Karpov actually led early on, only to get worn down by Kasparov, and then was controversially halted with no winner declared.  
> I have a book about it, autographed by Kasparov (Garry Kasparov on Modern Chess, Part 2: Kasparov vs Karpov 1975-1985).

See post 17! 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![borschevsky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/97f17d/32.png) [@borschevsky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/borschevsky)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2018, 6:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/38 "2018-11-15T18:28:17Z")

</div>

Game 5: draw. Carlsen gets white in games 6 and 7.

> [@Jasmine](#):
>
> Besides, if Carlsen really has a definitive advantage in that format, his challenger may feel forced to play wide open, risky chess before reaching that point. That could very well produce a winning game for someone.

This is essentially what happened in the Anand-Topalov championship match. Topalov overpressed in the last classical game, trying to avoid Anand’s strength in the rapid games, and got himself beaten immediately instead.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TroutMan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/troutman/32/6721_2.png) [@TroutMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TroutMan)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2018, 10:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/39 "2018-11-16T22:00:09Z")

</div>

Another draw in game 6. Caruana seemed to have a consensus winning position at one point, but Carlsen defended successfully.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2018, 1:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334/40 "2018-11-17T01:41:39Z")

</div>

So does that mean that the position wasn’t winning after all, or just that Carlsen managed to hold out long enough for Caruana to screw up?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/world-chess-championship-match-2018/824334.md?page=3)
