# Worst Good Book You Have Ever Read

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163
**Category:** Cafe Society
**Created:** [March 24, 2004, 6:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163 "2004-03-24T18:29:10Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![HumptysHamhole](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f0a364/32.png) [@HumptysHamhole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HumptysHamhole)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 6:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/1 "2004-03-24T18:29:10Z")

</div>

What is the worst good book you have ever read? There are thousands of terrible books out there but choose from the books that are critically acclaimed. What supposedly great book actually sucked in your opinion?

The Mill on the Floss - Eliot - boring and whiny and a complete waste of my time - I wish they had drowned in chapter one

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![bouv](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/bc8723/32.png) [@bouv](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bouv)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 6:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/2 "2004-03-24T18:33:53Z")

</div>

“Cat’s Eye” by Margaret Atwood. What a crappy piece of crap that was. It was basically what Atwood wished her life were like, I think. It’s half autobiographical to begin with, and some other radnom things seem to be thrown in there just because. The story doesn’t seem to go anywhere, and it’s all in all boring as Hell.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tentacle\_Monster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ba9def/32.png) [@Tentacle\_Monster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tentacle_Monster)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 6:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/3 "2004-03-24T18:37:07Z")

</div>

_The Catcher In The Rye_ by J. D. Salinger. As a moody loner in high school, I was pretty sure I’d like it. Wrong-o.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Draelin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ce73a5/32.png) [@Draelin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Draelin)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 6:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/4 "2004-03-24T18:39:46Z")

</div>

_The Good Earth_. I’m certain it was just a way to see how much pure torture high-school sophomores can take.

_A Farewell To Arms_. See above, only with juniors. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Biffy\_the\_Elephant\_Shrew](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e47c2d/32.png) [@Biffy\_the\_Elephant\_Shrew](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Biffy_the_Elephant_Shrew)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 6:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/5 "2004-03-24T18:45:56Z")

</div>

I didn’t get very far into _Tristram Shandy_. I’m not sure why, but I simply couldn’t get into it, and I was just forcing myself to go on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![RikWriter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/49beb7/32.png) [@RikWriter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RikWriter)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 6:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/6 "2004-03-24T18:50:15Z")

</div>

Great Expectations by Dickens. Read it for sophomore English lit class in High School. Hated then, hate it to this day.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 6:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/7 "2004-03-24T18:53:39Z")

</div>

Anything by Faulkner. I envy the people who like Faulkner because he kept turning up like a bad penny in my curriculum.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Inigo\_Montoya](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inigo_montoya/32/124_2.png) [@Inigo\_Montoya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inigo_Montoya)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 6:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/8 "2004-03-24T18:56:17Z")

</div>

Was going to say _Moby Dick_, but then I remembered the abomination that is _A Portrait of a Lady_. Gag me with a spoon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![elfkin477](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/a9a28c/32.png) [@elfkin477](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elfkin477)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 7:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/9 "2004-03-24T19:01:31Z")

</div>

Classically over-rated: **The Scarlet Letter**.

Contemporarily over-rated: A toss up between the \*\* His Dark Materials\*\* series and **Cold Mountain**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sister\_Vigilante](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9de0a6/32.png) [@Sister\_Vigilante](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sister_Vigilante)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 7:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/10 "2004-03-24T19:10:00Z")

</div>

I had been planning to read **Portrait of a Lady** , and I found it hard to get into. Guess I won’t bother.

Mine:  
**Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde  
Frankenstein  
Dracula** couldn’t even finish it  
and every book I had to read while majoring in English Lit in College.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Aitara](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b3f665/32.png) [@Aitara](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aitara)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 7:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/11 "2004-03-24T19:12:29Z")

</div>

I have two nominations, both read in the 8th grade.

1. _Of Human Bondage_ by W. Somerset Maugham

2. _The Old Man and the Sea_ by Ernest Hemingway.  
I keep meaning to reread both of them in the hopes that the passage of time may have improved them, I just have not been motivated to do so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![NotWithoutRage](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/22d042/32.png) [@NotWithoutRage](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NotWithoutRage)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 7:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/12 "2004-03-24T19:16:38Z")

</div>

A Tale of Two Cities and Moby Dick, without a doubt, two of the most craptastic pieces of literature available.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 7:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/13 "2004-03-24T19:16:53Z")

</div>

How about non-fiction?

Robert McNamara’s _In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam_, written with Brian VanDeMark, is his book about the decisions made in the White House concerning Vietnam, one of those few books that everyone in the U.S. should read. Its lessons about “the fog of war” (and yes, everybody should go see the documentary of that name) are so crucial that every person that goes to work in the White House should be given a copy of the book upon entrance and forced to read it.

But it is the single worst-written ghosted book I’ve ever read. I don’t know what Brian VanDeMark did to earn his pay but the book takes forever to go through because it is like reading briefing memos for 300 pages.

I still have to recommend it for its subject matter, but don’t say I didn’t warn you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Doomtrain](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/0ea827/32.png) [@Doomtrain](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Doomtrain)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 7:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/14 "2004-03-24T19:18:23Z")

</div>

Most of them, honestly. _The Sun Also Rises_ was a bunch of boring 20-somethings wandering around Europe drinking. Whoa, momma, does the fun ever start! _The Scarlet Letter_ sucks massive amounts of ass. _100 Years Of Solitude_ is about a bunch of Mexicans doing stupid stuff in long, boring fashion.

Honestly, I think whoever picks “good books” just wants something most people won’t sit through. I can’t wait to get out of college again and get back to reading decent stuff.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Brainiac4](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/brainiac4/32/3534_2.png) [@Brainiac4](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Brainiac4)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 7:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/15 "2004-03-24T19:21:09Z")

</div>

Two things spring to mind… neither one of which is a pleasant memory, thank you very much.

First, **Chronicles of Thomas Covenant**. Utter dreck featuring a loathsome protagonist. Only read one book and could not see why anyone else would recommend it, aside from the potential for _schadenfreude_.

Second, the entire **Wheel of Time** series. Robert Jordan needs an editor so badly it’s pathetic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Nonsuch](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/nonsuch/32/2922_2.png) [@Nonsuch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nonsuch)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 7:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/16 "2004-03-24T19:27:33Z")

</div>

I agree with the poster who nominated _Tristram Shandy_, though that period as a whole doesn’t really agree with me, so I can’t be too hard on it.

The worst book I’ve read from a period I’m otherwise disposed to like is _Sister Carrie_. Then again, more and more people seem to be admitting that the emperor has no clothes where Dreiser is concerned, so maybe _Sister Carrie’s_ days as a “great book” are numbered.

> [@Jean Grey](#):
>
> I had been planning to read **Portrait of a Lady** , and I found it hard to get into. Guess I won’t bother.

Bother. It’s a great book. Be patient with it, give yourself time to get used to it. Once I did, I couldn’t put it down.

> [@Jean Grey](#):
>
> Mine:  
> **Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde  
> Frankenstein  
> Dracula** couldn’t even finish it  
> and every book I had to read while majoring in English Lit in College.

You majored in English and disliked _everything you read_? 😕

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Dogzilla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e480ec/32.png) [@Dogzilla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dogzilla)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 7:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/17 "2004-03-24T19:32:19Z")

</div>

Hands down, no competition… **Silas Marner**. I hated that book so much that, when we finished it in 10th grade, I took great delight in shredding it, page by page, in front of my teacher. (Who grinned and said, “Gee, why don’t you tell me how you really feel about this book?” He’s a great guy!)

I would also nominate **The Celestine Prophecies**. Great ideas in concept, very poorly executed and also a book that takes itself way too seriously. Rather, perhaps the author takes himself way to seriously. I even read the sequel before deciding the auther was a whackjob and a hack and should go back to his day job.

Oh, how 'bout **Bridges Over Madison County**? There’s a suckfest if I ever read one. I read it because my boss loved it and gushed over it so much… I wanted to see what the hype was all about. I still have no idea what the hype was all about. Trite, cliched crap, that book. Yet a bestseller… go figure. (I’ve refused to see even a clip of this movie for the same reasons. Besides, Clint Eastwood in a romantic role? Gack!)

Finally… anything written by Michael Crichton. He really has a very simplistic writing style, which is really not very good. The “science” is very watered down and clearly not for anyone with any knowledge at all of the scientific topics he covers. Unfortunately, he’s good at suspense (or something) because once I start one of those books, I can’t put 'em down. Generally, the translations into movies fail to excite as well – even though some of those books would have made GREAT movies, had they been done better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pasunejen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/58956e/32.png) [@pasunejen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pasunejen)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 7:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/18 "2004-03-24T19:34:52Z")

</div>

**A Tale of Two Cities**. Almost anything by Dickens, really.

I’m not sure it’s renowned for being good so much as for being the first (?) English novel, but I once tried very hard to read **Tom Jones**. No dice. Ugh.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Jurph](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/50afbb/32.png) [@Jurph](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jurph)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 7:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/19 "2004-03-24T19:51:06Z")

</div>

> [@jsgoddess](#):
>
> Anything by Faulkner. I envy the people who like Faulkner because he kept turning up like a bad penny in my curriculum.

I will say, in defense of Faulkner, that my high school curriculum involved “double-reading” his books – read a chapter, attend a guided discussion about the chapter in class, and then RE-read that chapter. Hand in a paper demonstrating you “get” what Faulkner intended from that chapter and the importance of any plot points. It was _excruciating_ reading him the first time through, but once I got a certain amount of faith in my instructor and learned the “tricks” Faulkner used, I began to be able to “decode” his writing on the fly.

I’ll save this for a **Great Debates** thread, but if a novel requires a Master’s degree and three readings (the first of which is guaranteed to be painful) to “decode” the author’s message, then it’s not much of a “good book”.

**RikWriter** , we also did Great Expectations (I also had to do it once before high school in 7th grade – WAY too early!). I hated it the first time. I hated it the _second_ time, but with the teacher’s explanations, I appreciated it as a good work on the third go-round. Not GREAT, just… good. And I think it’s an important enough piece of literature with compelling enough characters that I’ve got copies all marked up on my bookshelf for when my kids are ready for it.

Now, for the book that double-reading couldn’t fix: **Their Eyes Were Watching God**. Depressing plot, poorly imagined characters, sappy descriptions, and not a single question or situation that intrigued me, even for a moment. Never caught my interest. I simply. Didn’t. Give. A. Shit. about her attempts to make me care about anyone or anything in the book. The second reading was WORSE.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pasunejen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/58956e/32.png) [@pasunejen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pasunejen)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2004, 7:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163/20 "2004-03-24T19:56:41Z")

</div>

> [@Jurph](#):
>
> Now, for the book that double-reading couldn’t fix: **Their Eyes Were Watching God**. Depressing plot, poorly imagined characters, sappy descriptions, and not a single question or situation that intrigued me, even for a moment. Never caught my interest. I simply. Didn’t. Give. A. Shit. about her attempts to make me care about anyone or anything in the book. The second reading was WORSE.

Oh, wow, I think I repressed this one. I would like to change my vote. **Their Eyes Were Watching God** it is.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/worst-good-book-you-have-ever-read/236163.md?page=2)
