Worst Good Book You Have Ever Read

Somebody mentioned Achebe’s Things Fall Apart somewhere up there. It always makes me smile when that book is mentioned, because I quoted Achebe in a paper I wrote for English about A Clockwork Orange (loved it when I was in college; now I think it’s just a tedious novel about a tedious philosophy). My prof gave me a D+ on the paper. He wrote, next to the Achebe quote, that he considered himself to be reasonably well-read, but he had never heard of Things Fall Apart (and implicitly, therefore, not a book worthy of citing in his class). Even though he was an English professor! Who specialized in modern literature!

I hate Marcel Proust. Good God. I only finished Swan’s way, and that was only because I was forced to write two papers on it. I could not believe that anything so long and so dull could exist in the universe. Seven volumes! What have we done wrong?

Agree about Henry James. The Turn of the Screw is like listening to somebody talking in a self-help group… rambling on and on and on and having no apparent point. I’ve framed the paper I wrote on the subject, called “Henry James: A Screw Loose.” This also received a D+.

I loathed The Iliad. Hektor couldn’t just whack Achilles, could he? No. We had to be treated to the complete lineage of both Hektor and Achilles, embellished with censuses of all the goats that somebody’s grandfather sacrificed to the gods, menus of what somebody else’s uncle had for breakfast, ad nauseum. I understand now that Homer wasn’t supposed to be read, but performed… and that it can’t really be translated from Greek without turning it into a dull chore to read. My grade on the paper on Homer? Getting better, got a B-.

I’m risking the Pit for saying this, but there is nothing good by Virginia Woolf except for A Room of One’s Own. Actually, now that I think about it, out of Capital-L Literature I much prefer non-fiction over fiction.

Finally, in re: Gatsby. I don’t hate the book. But even though I’ve been assigned to read it, like, six times, I can never remember anything about it.

Mine have already been mentioned, but here they are.

Portrait of a Lady
Way too wordy, and filled will needless descriptions and facts. Really hard to read. I got within four or five chapters of finishing for a lit class, and then stopped. We had finished discussing it in class, and I had zero desire to read any more of it.

The Great Gatsby
This, on the other hand, I’ve read three times: twice in high school (I studied it in 11th grade, then, because I switched schools, again in 12th grade) and once in college. I hated it more every time. Unlike Portrait, Gatsby is easy to read; the writing is well crafted and concise. But none of the characters are likable (with the possible exception of Gatsby, who gets the shaft) and the overall message of the book seems to be that people suck, life sucks, and there’s nothing anyone can do about it. How depressing and stupid. Just because something is very well written doesn’t mean it’s great literature.

Hmm… According to his autobiography, Mark Twain was an excellent speller. He says that, in school, he got a prize nearly every week (or month, or something) for being the best speller in the class. Where did you read he was a bad speller?

As a general comment on this thread, there ought to be a rule that you aren’t allowed to dislike a book you were forced to read for school, as that experience can be seriously off-putting - many’s the book I hated in school that I liked afterwards, when persuaded to read it again years later.

Hands down, it’s James Fenimore Cooper’s Last of the Mohicans. Halfway through the first chapter, I looked on the cover to find out who translated so badly and lo and behold, it wasn’t translated! English was Cooper’s native tongue.

It’s one of those rare cases where some Hollywood screenwriter actually improved upon the book, IMO.

Then there’s Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina, which for the life of me I cannot get through. I have been re-reading the same chapter for eons now and can’t get through the hunting lodge scene without falling asleep. I even tried to rent the movie with the beautiful actress who was Mel Gibson’s wife in Braveheart (Sophie something?) and I fell asleep watching that, too! I’ll never know what fate becomes the star crossed lovers.

Contemporary wise, Diana Gabaldon is one of my favorite authors. I wildly anticipated her latest offering in a double trilogy, **Drums of Autumn{/b], and was sorely disappointed. 200 pages into the 1000+ page novel, and we were STILL on DAY ONE. Arggh!

I have never managed to finish anything by D. H. Lawrence.

Now, over the years I’ve come to love works by authors who did not appeal on first read, so I persisted. Nope. Several years after my last attempt, I read a critique of Lawrence by Angela Carter (one of my absolute favorite writers, on the other hand, and I mourn her death) that perfectly jibed with my feelings about the man. Giggled to myself all through an El ride. :smiley:

Ethan Frome, no question. A literary lobotomy.

And here’s where you’re wrong. Many people cannot even get through a first reading of Dickens because he sucks all the light out of a room. JMO, YMMV.

I find that extraordinarily hard to believe, considering that you cannot even spell the bloody title. Hurts your credibility, ya know.

I don’t think many of Faulkner’s novels are accessible to younger readers, with the possible exception of As I Lay Dying, which can be read on numerous levels. I wish high school teachers would stop assigning them (and so many of the other books on this thread) and ruining those authors forever.

Sticks and stones will break my bones, but you still cannot spell or punctuate correctly. :rolleyes:

The works of Tom Robbins have been recommended to me by several different friends whose opinions I trust. They always ask what I’ve read, then always recommend their favorite as “different”, and “the best”. Despite these assurances, Half asleep in Frog Pajamas, Even Cowgirls Get the Blues, and Still Life with Woodpecker are all utter garbage. The phrase “self- indulgent baby boomer crap” just keeps running through my head.
Along the same lines, a former girlfriend convinced me to read John Irving’s A Prayer for Owen Meany by telling me it was the best book she had ever read. This made me concerned that stupidity might be sexually transmitted.

For me it’s got to be Clarissa by Samuel Richardson. Ack. Written in the 1740s, more than 1000 pages long, and infuriating. Clarissa escapes from Lovelace, is recaptured, Clarissa escapes from Lovelace, is recaptured, Clarissa escapes from Lovelace, is recaptured, on and on, or so it felt like, until Lovelace has his way with her, and then she spends the last half of the book dying of the shame of it all. It’s been almost forty years since I read it, but ack! still.

On the other hand, I liked Robinson Crusoe and Moll Flanders and Tom Jones.

I liked the first hundred odd pages, then when the whole religion angle began it felt like the original writer was sacked and replaced at the last moment at great expense a la the opening credits to Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Grr.

I’ve never gotten past page 30 or so of Ulysses, but I did like The Great Gatsby in high school.

In one freshman college course we had to read Marx, and I wrote a whole paper about how Marx was full of shit.

You have my sympathies. We read Richardson’s Pamela instead. Equally dull but about half the length.

My other nominations are:
Last of the Mohicans --What cruel teacher gives 8th graders a 400 page book?
The Old Man and The Sea
Henry V
Julius Caesar—Shakespeare should have stuck to tragedies.
Sometimes a Great Notion–didn’t like One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, this is more of the same, only longer.
For some reason, it’s easier to remember the books I liked, like Invisible Man and A Separate Peace. Perhaps I’m repressing memories :smiley:

Not quite a classic, but Vernon God Little, though I must commend the author as it does take major talent to turn the aftermath of a school shooting into a boring, ordinary, drawn out and wholely uninteresting affair. After every chapter (yes, I did read the whole thing) I’d mutter ‘THIS won the booker prize?’ convinced that is was up against a stack of Mr. Men children’s books and a badly worn R.L. Stine novel, and not even from the Fear Street series.

I did three more chapters last night. Then I gave up. Emma is a jerk, her father is a twit, and practically everyone else would benefit greatly from a smack upside the head.

Shodan’s new Rule of Great Literature: If nothing happens in Volume One, nothing is going to happen in Volume Two.

Sorry. Unless Northanger Abbey is radically better than Emma, Jane Austen goes onto my list of one-hit wonders of the literary world.

Regards,
Shodan

Oooh! ooooh! Just remembered: Dr. Zhivago.

well, i must have a much higher threshold for tolerating stuff than most people here-- most of the books that everybody mentions (that i’ve actually read) i thought were quite enjoyable. and i did a buzzsaw through the school libraries from grade to high school, so most of the classics i covered were all voluntary, to boot.

OMG, somebody else actually read (and admits to reading) this pointless suckfest? i found a paperback version in some wildly inappropriate aisle of a drugstore many years ago. it seemed like a possible good SF read at the time. o man, was i wrong! probably one of the first books i ever read that made me say “That was the ending???” for the longest time, i thought the problem was all ME, that i must have missed something Relevant or Important somewhere in there. thank you soooo much for affirming that there really was no “there” there!

and i agree with whoever mentioned The Awakening. i read it when i found it among books my husband was giving away (i’m thinking it was a Required Reading assignment from school). while i can, semi-objectively i suppose, sort of appreciate it for allegedly being a ground-breaking piece, i was more than happy for it to be OVER, already! another one straight to the giveaway box.

i recently re-read The Last of the Mohicans, and i’m sorry to admit that it hasn’t carried well since the first time i consumed it. that might be a topic for a GD thread – how evolving societal roles (and losing touch with the “realities” of earlier historical periods) can reduce appreciation or acceptance of previous classics.

i’ll confess, one of the few books i never quite completed was Anna Karenina. (which was really quite sad, because i probably only had less than a hundred or so pages to go to the end.) but i obviously took this one on at far too early an age (probably junior high), so i found it quite hard to really identify with any of the characters or get that “into” the story. maybe someday…
now, having covered all that, may i introduce my suggestion for Biggest Steaming Pile of Crap Between Two Covers. ladies and gentlemen, i give you…

Look Homeward, Angel, by Thomas Wolfe. ! i’ll admit, the only reason i read this (and stupidly persevered in said reading) was because i remembered having seen the title on some ancient list of Recommended Books back from my school days. i gather (from an on-line summary i browsed to refresh my memory as to who was responsible for this Steaming Pile) that Mssr. Wolfe may no longer be considered quite the leading light of literature that once was his lot. if so, all i can say is “Bloody good show!” this is probably the closest i’ve ever gotten to actually hating a book and EVERY ONE OF THE CHARACTERS IN IT. i’ve never read about such a repellant family, dysfunctional in gargantuan proportions. none of them achieve any sort of redemption (or even likability) that i could see. by the end, i really didn’t give a major crap as to what happened to any of them. when i finished this one, all i could do was look at it and go “WTF??? This was A Major Piece of Literature???”

couldn’t get it into my GET RID OF pile fast enough. (and if you ever saw the massive shelfspace devoted to all the books i’ve owned and haven’t been able to part with*, you’d know that’s saying a lot.)

*of course, that doesn’t begin to cover all the books i’ve read and enjoyed, since i was a rabid supporter of the school and public libraries through all my school years.

I love to read. I practically devour books and have done so since I was very young. However, middle school and high school English classes very nearly destroyed my love of reading. Why they persist in forcing students to read this crap is beyond me. These books are called classics; they are crap and have probably done more to contribute to the functional illiteracy of America than anything else I can think of.

My list of worst offenders:

Mill on the Floss
Silas Marner
Great Expectations
The Good Earth

I’d list more, but I don’t want to pick the scabs off of too many mental wounds…

I will pick off one scab. I had to read this for freshman English in college: The Myth of Sisyphus, by Albert Camus. It sucked so bad, it was unbelievable. I actually forced myself to read some other drivel of his to see if it was just that one book or if it was him. It was him; the man is a drooling idiot.

I never finished Dhalgren. I bailed before I was halfway through because, aside from boring young people writing bad poetry and having dull sex, there was nothing happening!

Blasphemy!
:eek:

Well, to each his own, of course. I like Jane Austen a great deal, and Emma is actually not one of my favorites. Is NA your final effort? Is that after just the two you mentioned, or have you tried her others? Do you know it’s a parody of gothic novels and should be read as such? Good luck! :slight_smile: