Which is why complex characters who are nonetheless fundamentally despicible can be so compelling. Dan Feilding, Louie DePalma, J.R. Ewing, Spike, etc. are often more interesting characters than the leads that they are supporting.
My pet peeve is the networks’ insistence on pairing good comedies with crappy ones. When a popular lead in has a follow up that holds its audience well, networks invariably move the popular second show so that it can act as lead in for an untested or weak show. This happened in mid to late 80’s with Family Ties and The Cosby Show. Family Ties premiered following the mediocre Gimme a Break and got good ratings for a rookie show with a weak lead in. The Cosby Show replaced Gimme at 8:00, solidfying NBC’s Thursday night lineup. Cosby shot to number one, and Family Ties held nearly all of the audience, coming in at number 2. NBC, thinking that they were wasting the number two show on tv by having it in the less desirable second slot, moved it several times always losing some of the audience, and put dud after dud in the slot after Cosby, apparently believing that the Cosby magic would work with any piece of crap they put there, or that audiences were too lazy to switch the channel at the half hour. Family Ties was number two following Cosby in large part because 1. it was a good show and 2. it was a good complement to Cosby–a show about an upper middle class family focusing on the kids following a show about an upper middle class family focusing on the parents.
They did it right with Cheers and Night Court. Again, these shows, both workplace comedies in which the workplace relationships took the place of non-existent personal lives, complemented each other well. Night Court held Cheers considerable audience well, and NBC kept it following Cheers for the entire run, recognizing that it was not the type of show that would make a strong lead in.
ABC had a goldmine with Roseanne/Coach, but decided Roseanne was too popular to have a strong show like Coach follwing it, and needed to be used to build the popularity of other new or struggling shows.
The result of this strategy–any second slot show that gets too popular must become a lead in–results in there being very few solid comedy pairs that last more than a season or two.
And a second vote for the cancellation of The Beverly Hillbillies. The show was number 1 in its first two seasons then dropped off to sit steadily around number 8-12. In the 69-70 season, it was a respectable 18. The cast and producers were all willing to come back for another year, but CBS didn’t feel it fit the new image they wanted to project, and cancelled it. This was before shows jumping networks was common, as nobody wanted to adopt what was seen as damaged property.