Being nitpicky abiout is one of life’s rare pleasures.
But seriously, there’s no authoritative, straightforward answer to your question 'cause with regard to life we have only the one data point–Earth–where we definitively know life exists and what conditions indicate it. I would conjecture (despite Blake’s contention) that a planet with a strong spectroscopic oxygen band has a very high probability of having some kind of life, or at least conditions which would be very condusive to life as we know it. That doesn’t mean that the absence would indicate a corresponding low probability of life; life (even complex life) might very well exist without free oxygen. We just don’t have enough empirical knowledge to reach any definitive conclusions.
I don’t know how long it will be until we are capable of discovering those conditions on another world. Right now it stretches astronometric technology to the limit just to detect other (very large, close orbiting) worlds at nearby stars and get some very rough notions of their orbital characteristics and mass, with only speculative inferences about their composition. From a nearby star with properties for supporting life as we know it (Tau Ceti) we would be hard pressed to observe indications of Jupiter, much less the inner rocky worlds where life as we know it is likely to have developed.
Stranger