Would/could a container ship stop for a guy drifting in the ocean?

Neat, thanks. I thought maybe a raft was more stable, though I was mentally comparing it to a traditional little wooden boat.

Of course, that might not even be accurate. Everything I know about boats, I learned as a kid in my bathtub.

I own a large sailboat and I first sailed solo when I was five. I belong to a bunch of sailing groups and message boards and the vast consensus is that All Is Lost is a comedy.

Have a large hole in your boat? Better shave!

Sailing far off shore? Long range communication gear is overrated!

Boat slowly sinking? Better tie your life raft to it and take a nap!

For around $400 bucks he could have bought an EPIRB (emergency position indicating radio beacon) and the movie would have been over quickly.

It will depend on the characteristics of the boat. An inflatable raft might resist sinking or overturning better than some boats (and maybe be easier to right if they do). But if you have a good boat, it would probably be better than a raft in most conditions.

Great post, thanks!

Things are different nowadays. My husband’s container ship has a pool, gym, game room, and a book/video game library. He has a 3-room apparment with private office and video console.

You should see how they eat. Puts the SS Martha to shame. :smiley:

BTW, most of his rescues consist of giving the rescuees water, fuel and food to get back home at their own request. Many times fishermen run out of fuel in the middle of nowhere.

There are stories of ships coming into port with sails and rigging tangled in their bow gear or anchor chains… and no one on board has any idea when or where it happened.

In this case, the “pool” was actually hanging over the side of the ship, which is why “jumping over the wrong side” landed him in the ocean. And no, it was container ship, not a cruise ship. (It was an old ship even then, and that was 20 years ago)

I’d like to point out that the statement “more than a mile” here is an understatement. The International Maritime Organisation, which is the international regulatory body for shipping, requires (PDF file) ships to be able to come to a halt in 15 ship lengths, in exceptional cases 20. For a modern 400 metre container vessel, that would be between 6 kilometres (3.7 land miles, 3.2 nautical miles) and 8 kilometres (5 land miles, 4.3 nautical miles). But that’s for an extreme emergency stop where engines are set on full astern, something that is very rarely done because it wastes fuel and damages the hull.

True, but a vessel does not and should not need to stop to perform MOB operation

It doesn’t have to stop, it can turn.

Also, “damages the hull”? In what way?

What other images?

Wrong side of the pool? WTH. On a container ship? I doubt things have changed that much.

I guess I quit going to sea too soon. When I was sailing on the chief and captain had more than one room. And they only had two.

Yeah, I’m struggling. A container vessel with a pool well yeah OK some of the major container lines look after their crews reasonably well. But then a pool where you can jump out of the wrong side and go o/b? So we are talking about a container line that really looks after their people… but has no clue whatsoever about even the most basic principles of safety at sea. Can’t think of too many container lines with that degree of internal cognitive dissonance.

And then the pool was “hanging over the side”? Uh, what? Was the naval architect Frank Lloyd Wright or…

Well, he actually works for the world’s largest shipping company. Mileage does indeed vary depending on how companies treat their crews.

They also pay all my expenses if I want to travel with him occasionally. Which I did before we had a kid to complicate things. :wink:

It was “hanging over the side” because the ship was so old that it was built without a crew pool. So they jury-rigged one.

And now we see how stupid that was.

I’m not sure how this scales to the job of the lookout, but in manufacturing the only thing worse than human inspection is no inspection. Yeah, sure, we constantly implement human inspection as a stopgap when something has gone wrong, but that assuages management more than it actually accomplishes anything.

I have to imagine that being watch on a ship is pretty much the same, unless you’re in a war or something.

Foul weather and a lee shore might do it, even for a modern-day powered vessel.