# Would it be possible to get one nonsense thread?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-it-be-possible-to-get-one-nonsense-thread/497991>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [May 29, 2009, 2:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-it-be-possible-to-get-one-nonsense-thread/497991 "2009-05-29T02:56:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jragon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e19b73/32.png) [@Jragon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jragon)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2009, 2:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-it-be-possible-to-get-one-nonsense-thread/497991/1 "2009-05-29T02:56:10Z")

</div>

Threads like [this](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=519093), I mean.

I can understand the reason why they’re closed, but wanted to try to plead the case for a single master nonsense thread to get the stuff out of our system now and then\*. I find the threads fun and amusing at the very least. I can’t really argue they’re productive, but I figure I’d at least ask for having one free-association, higher-than-a-kite, cloud cuckooland thread could be worthwhile from a strict entertainment perspective.

- Meaning a single arbitrarily large thread that contains all the nonsense that’s bumped on occasion, no opening new crazy threads.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TruCelt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/trucelt/32/523_2.png) [@TruCelt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TruCelt)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2009, 3:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-it-be-possible-to-get-one-nonsense-thread/497991/2 "2009-05-29T03:06:15Z")

</div>

Hear, hear!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carol\_Stream](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/c2a13f/32.png) [@Carol\_Stream](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Carol_Stream)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2009, 4:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-it-be-possible-to-get-one-nonsense-thread/497991/3 "2009-05-29T04:06:34Z")

</div>

> [@Jragon](#):
>
> Threads like [this](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=519093), I mean.
> 
> I can understand the reason why they’re closed, but wanted to try to plead the case for a single master nonsense thread to get the stuff out of our system now and then\*. I find the threads fun and amusing at the very least. I can’t really argue they’re productive, but I figure I’d at least ask for having one free-association, higher-than-a-kite, cloud cuckooland thread could be worthwhile from a strict entertainment perspective.
> 
> - Meaning a single arbitrarily large thread that contains all the nonsense that’s bumped on occasion, no opening new crazy threads.

You already have an entire forum called MPSIMS. Why not post there?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2009, 5:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-it-be-possible-to-get-one-nonsense-thread/497991/4 "2009-05-29T05:05:38Z")

</div>

Great idea! We could call it “Titanic Wallpaper”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JimOfAllTrades](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba8739/32.png) [@JimOfAllTrades](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JimOfAllTrades)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2009, 5:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-it-be-possible-to-get-one-nonsense-thread/497991/5 "2009-05-29T05:48:51Z")

</div>

And we could try and find out who Mr. Ruda Duda was!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jragon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e19b73/32.png) [@Jragon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jragon)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2009, 5:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-it-be-possible-to-get-one-nonsense-thread/497991/6 "2009-05-29T05:52:05Z")

</div>

> [@Carol\_Stream](#):
>
> You already have an entire forum called MPSIMS. Why not post there?

As per the [MPSIMS rules](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=9505194&postcount=4).

> [@](#):
>
> Even this forum—with its spectacular name—has its limits for truly pointless threads. We will be closing threads which cross that line, or exist merely for post-padding reasons. This includes any post count parties.
> 
> We understand that determining what is or isn’t pointless is a subjective process, but we reserve the right to make the final decision. We will, however, be as consistent as possible, with the caveat that as human beings with families, jobs and other distractions, we’ll probably foul up once or twice.

I’m asking for one “truly pointless thread.” You know, something that makes no sense and really has no coherent concept of “topic.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Covered\_In\_Bees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/7ab992/32.png) [@Covered\_In\_Bees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Covered_In_Bees)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2009, 7:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-it-be-possible-to-get-one-nonsense-thread/497991/7 "2009-05-29T07:14:06Z")

</div>

A nonsense thread is prohibited by the rules disallowing post count padding threads.

Not saying I agree or disagree with not allowing post count padding threads, just stating why a nonsense thread is very likely to never happen while the aforementioned rule is in practice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DudleyGarrett](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/d9b06d/32.png) [@DudleyGarrett](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DudleyGarrett)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2009, 11:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-it-be-possible-to-get-one-nonsense-thread/497991/8 "2009-05-29T11:30:22Z")

</div>

Who gives a flying fuck how many posts they have?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Arnold\_Winkelried](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Arnold\_Winkelried](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Arnold_Winkelried)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2009, 5:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-it-be-possible-to-get-one-nonsense-thread/497991/9 "2009-05-29T17:28:38Z")

</div>

What’s that Aesop story about the fox and the grapes? 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2009, 5:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-it-be-possible-to-get-one-nonsense-thread/497991/10 "2009-05-29T17:40:31Z")

</div>

[We had this discussion recently](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=512575), and I said I’d be willing to let some nonsense threads go in MPSIMS and see what happens. I can only remember one real nonsense thread being posted since that time, but I haven’t really looked.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lieu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/c2a13f/32.png) [@lieu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lieu)\
**Post date:** [May 29, 2009, 5:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-it-be-possible-to-get-one-nonsense-thread/497991/11 "2009-05-29T17:44:09Z")

</div>

You can’t be serious.

Well, not all the time anyway.
