# Would we lose anything if we ended all Sheriff's departments?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [August 6, 2024, 8:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347 "2024-08-06T20:02:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/loach/32/350_2.png) [@Loach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loach)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 1:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/61 "2024-08-07T13:45:12Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> > [@Beckdawrek](#):
> >
> > Well, I don’t know. Do city police actually man the _County_ courthouse.
> > 
> > I don’t think so.
> 
> I am suggesting if there were no sheriffs then the local police would take over those duties.
> 
> Why am I paying for both?
> 
> I can tell you the sheriff will never, ever show up to my place if I call 911.

My reply got borked multiple times so I’ll just do it briefly this time.

You would still have to pay for both. The Sheriff’s office generally performs duties that local departments don’t. Eliminate the Sheriffs and those jobs will just have to be done by someone else. The only difference is they would be wearing a different uniform. It’s a big country and I’m sure there is some redundancy in certain jurisdictions. In the county I work in there is no overlap between local and county police. They handle their jobs in the court and the jail and town cops handle their jobs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pkbites](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pkbites/32/204_2.png) [@pkbites](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pkbites)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 1:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/62 "2024-08-07T13:50:41Z")

</div>

> [@Saint\_Cad](#):
>
> > [@pkbites](#):
> >
> > There are also a lot of incompetent fuckwit crooked police chiefs who get appointed by crooked common councils.
> 
> I live in a small town and the police reflected the small town politics. Luckily things improved with an overhaul of our Town Council.

That’s my point. To change the situation several members of the council have to be replaced. That can take many election cycles. With a Sheriff only one person has to be booted out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![asterion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/4da419/32.png) [@asterion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/asterion)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 2:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/63 "2024-08-07T14:58:45Z")

</div>

Bernalillo County voters recently booted an idiot of a sheriff who seemed to have been elected because of the D after his name. Why such a position is partisan aside, there was definite remorse of “well, this is why you don’t mindlessly vote straight ticket.” Much better than the controversies around Albuquerque police and leadership that’s still somehow employed.

This is the sort of thread I find frustrating, where you get liberals going “Well, I don’t use that, so it has no value.” Which is a response they wouldn’t accept from the other side about something they use.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kenobi\_65](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kenobi_65/32/13178_2.png) [@kenobi\_65](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kenobi_65)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 3:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/64 "2024-08-07T15:00:41Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> I am suggesting if there were no sheriffs then the local police would take over those duties.
> 
> Why am I paying for both?

In _your area_. What is being said here, by many people, is that in many counties and states, particularly in unincorporated areas, there _is no local police_, other than the sheriff’s department.

When I was young, my family lived in a comfortable suburban area, outside of Green Bay. But, it was an unincorporated village, and our “police” service was provided by the county sheriff.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 3:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/65 "2024-08-07T15:53:45Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> ISTM then you should pay for the sheriff. You want a low tax rate in an unincorporated area then you need to pay for your own police. I pay for mine.

The million dollar question here is if the sheriff goes away, do your taxes go down?

Here’s an example of why eliminating the sheriff in unincorporated areas may not reduce your taxes:  
[Gwinnett County Millage Rates](https://gwinnetttaxcommissioner.publicaccessnow.com/PropertyTax/BillingInformation/MillageRates.aspx)  
In Gwinnett county, the unincorporated areas pay 2.9 mill for police. Incorporated areas that have their own police departments funded from city taxes pay 0 mill for police to the county.

This may not be the case where you live, but it is evident that it is straightforward to set up tax rates so that folks like you who locally fund law enforcement aren’t funding law enforcement for areas without local police. There’s no need to blow up the idea of Sheriffs, when the problem is solved with a 1 page tax table.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/loach/32/350_2.png) [@Loach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loach)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 4:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/66 "2024-08-07T16:12:31Z")

</div>

> [@kenobi\_65](#):
>
> > [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
> >
> > I am suggesting if there were no sheriffs then the local police would take over those duties.
> > 
> > Why am I paying for both?
> 
> In _your area_. What is being said here, by many people, is that in many counties and states, particularly in unincorporated areas, there _is no local police_, other than the sheriff’s department.
> 
> When I was young, my family lived in a comfortable suburban area, outside of Green Bay. But, it was an unincorporated village, and our “police” service was provided by the county sheriff.

In the county I work in there are no unincorporated areas. The Sheriff still has a role it’s just not patrol. Like I said before the jobs they do have to be done. It doesn’t matter what you call them.

In New Jersey the role of patrolling otherwise uncovered areas falls on the state police. Back when they were formed by H. Norman Schwarzkopf Sr that was their main purpose. They patrol many small towns that are too small to have their own police force. Part of the towns taxes go to the state to pay for it. I used to live in a town where if I called 911 I would get the state police.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pasta](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ecccb3/32.png) [@Pasta](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pasta)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 4:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/67 "2024-08-07T16:16:31Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> Why am I paying for both?

While I don’t think this way of thinking makes sense, as others have thoughtfully described, taking it at face value for a moment –

Why isn’t your starting point that the sheriff services are the default? If you don’t want to “pay for both”, your municipality didn’t have to create its (in your eyes redundant) police force when services were already available, and you didn’t have to choose to incorporate at all (or you can get your neighbors onboard with dissolving your municipality). Your area’s local choices need not be framed as the fault of those in unincorporated areas that had nothing to do with your tax bill for whatever additional and potentially redundant services you wanted to pay for.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![enipla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/54ee81/32.png) [@enipla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/enipla)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 4:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/68 "2024-08-07T16:29:29Z")

</div>

> [@Pasta](#):
>
> Why isn’t your starting point that the sheriff services are the default? If you don’t want to “pay for both”, your municipality didn’t have to create its (in your eyes redundant) police force when services were already available

The closest town to me has ~300 residents. It’s incorporated as it has a mayor and such.

They also have a police department. But either can’t afford it, or no one wants the job. Oh, about every other year someone takes the job for 6 months or so.

So, since they have a ‘cop car’ (mid-sided SUV) that has all the lights and badges and paint job and stuff, but no cop, the put a mannequin in it and park it on the side of the road to deter speeders. The locals call him ‘Barney’.

That’s my closest Police protection besides the county.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZipperJJ](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zipperjj/32/211_2.png) [@ZipperJJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZipperJJ)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 4:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/69 "2024-08-07T16:47:19Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> ISTM then you should pay for the sheriff. You want a low tax rate in an unincorporated area then you need to pay for your own police. I pay for mine.

Are you sure that Procrustus doesn’t pay a bit of their property taxes to directly fund sheriff protection?

Where I live there’s 2 townships neighboring our city. Our city has a full municipal police force. One of the townships has their own full municipal police force, the other township opts to use the county sheriff’s department. They assign 1 or 2 deputies to the township. The township has to CONTRACT the sheriff’s office, it’s not a free service. The township tried to switch to contracting with our city to have them cover it instead but our city said no. I guess the township isn’t happy with the cost of the sheriff’s contract and our city wasn’t interested in contracting for any less.

FWIW our fire department does cover both townships, by contract.

Anyway, it may seem like this township gets “free” sheriff services from the county but they are indeed paying extra, through property tax revenue. It’s just not specifically mentioned in the property tax breakdown.

That could be the case for where @Procrustus lives, and where you live too. But maybe not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 4:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/70 "2024-08-07T16:58:43Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> I assume people who live in unincorporated areas deliberately do so to have lower taxes and be more “free” in some sense. They could organize and incorporate. They choose not to. It’s on them. There are some upsides and downsides to it.

It’s not that easy to incorporate a city.

> **[Column: The dream of East L.A. as its own city rises again — along with doubters](https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-04-30/east-los-angeles-incorporation-dream)**
>
> Famous as a cradle of Chicano politics and culture, East L.A. is the most populous unincorporated community in California. Can a new cityhood drive succeed?

There’s a mess of local politics and special interests; some in favor of incorporation and some opposed. And some element of racism in the case of East L.A.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bear\_Nenno](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bear_nenno/32/3358_2.png) [@Bear\_Nenno](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bear_Nenno)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 5:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/71 "2024-08-07T17:12:03Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> But my taxes also pay for the sheriff who does pretty much nothing for me and I also pay for the police who do.

Where do your police take arrestees? The county jail, most likely. In my hometown, the police department has a very small jail. If the police take someone there, it is only very briefly before moving them to the country jail. (ETA: I’m not talking about a small police department, either. This is the 2nd largest department in Florida and the 50th largest in the country. They have a very tiny jail because they don’t really use it. They utilize the county jail. All of the departments in the area do. Even the Tribal police, Federal and State agencies. They all use the county jail.)  
(Edited again to add: I just looked online. The tiny jail I was talking about is now permanently closed. Also, it was apparently ran by the Sheriff’s Office as well even though it was in the middle of the city.)

All the police departments in the county, and the Sheriff’s department themselves, take those arrested to central booking at the county jail. If the inmates do not post bond or are not released, they are held at the county jail. Tax-payer funded and a benefit to everyone in the county, even those within the city. The state district court bailiffs and security are provided by the sheriff’s department.

At any rate, just because you have a police department to patrol your area doesn’t mean that everyone lives within a city. Those outside the city have patrol services provided by the sheriff’s office. Those outside the city still pay county taxes. If the Sheriff’s office did not exist, larger cities would need to provide police and fire services to the unincorporated areas. But, the cities wouldn’t be able to collect taxes. So, at that point, you would be fully funding their patrol services from your taxes, and they would pay nothing. Seems like that’s the opposite of what you want. So, in that case, you should not advocate for getting rid of the Sheriff.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marvin\_the\_Martian](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/marvin_the_martian/32/2898_2.png) [@Marvin\_the\_Martian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marvin_the_Martian)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 5:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/72 "2024-08-07T17:14:20Z")

</div>

> [@ZipperJJ](#):
>
> The township has to CONTRACT the sheriff’s office, it’s not a free service.

This. The town I live in is suburban, not rural and borders Scottsdale, tribal lands, and state forest. We do not have a police department, but we have 30 sheriff’s deputies and a captain assigned to the town. We pay close to $5 million annually for the service.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bear\_Nenno](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bear_nenno/32/3358_2.png) [@Bear\_Nenno](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bear_Nenno)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 5:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/73 "2024-08-07T17:23:57Z")

</div>

Taxes are not a la carte. Who runs the schools in your city? In my area, the county runs the schools. There are county services that you are enjoying, even if you don’t realize it. Your city isn’t providing everything. You don’t get to pick and choose where your tax money goes or which services you want added to your tax bill. Even if you live in a city, you also still have to pay county, State and Federal taxes. I bet you don’t see the DEA every day. I bet most of the drug busts in your area are done by the local police. But, you still have to pay for the DEA.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/74 "2024-08-07T17:27:58Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> I assume people who live in unincorporated areas deliberately do so to have lower taxes and be more “free” in some sense

Really? We live in our area (unincorporated) because of the natural beauty (Puget Sound waterfront), good schools, and access to Seattle via ferry when we like.

I don’t feel any more “free” than when I lived within the Seattle city limits. I’m also not sure my taxes are any lower. Certainly not in any significant way.

Note, I just looked it up:

| County | Median Home Value | Average Effective Property Tax Rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Island | $382,900 | 0.91% |
| Jefferson | $362,300 | 0.79% |
| King | $601,100 | 1.05% |
| Kitsap | $362,700 | 1.03% |

So, houses are cheaper _on average_. Taxes are about the same. (My house in Kitsap is worth more than my house in Seattle was worth, so my taxes went up)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BippityBoppityBoo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bippityboppityboo/32/5745_2.png) [@BippityBoppityBoo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BippityBoppityBoo)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 5:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/75 "2024-08-07T17:32:02Z")

</div>

> [@pkbites](#):
>
> As previously mentioned in most states Sheriff is a constitutional office, not a department of the county.

….A number of people have called and emailed me with the question of ‘am I a Constitutional  
Sheriff’? When I was first asked that question I thought it meant,  
‘is the Office of the Sheriff in  
Nebraska established in our constitution’? I can tell you it is not. Nor, is the Office of Sheriff  
mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. The excerpts below show the Nebraska Constitution gives  
the authority to establish sheriff’s offices to the Legislature. … [from [www.lancaster.gov](http://www.lancaster.gov), my county sheriff’s answer to is he a ‘constitutional sheriff’]

….“constitutional sheriffs” believe that sheriffs are the highest  
governmental authority and that they have the power and duty to defy or disregard laws they  
deem unconstitutional. Those last three words should concern all of us. “they deem  
unconstitutional”. Nowhere are Sheriffs given the legal authority to interpret the Constitution….

Therefore, my county sheriff concludes that there are no ‘constitutional sheriffs’ in my state. Certainly not as so many wish there was. Those ‘constitutional sheriffs believers’ are fascism adjacent as was determined in Arizona for example.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![enipla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/54ee81/32.png) [@enipla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/enipla)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/76 "2024-08-07T18:52:45Z")

</div>

> [@Procrustus](#):
>
> Really? We live in our area (unincorporated) because of the natural beauty (Puget Sound waterfront), good schools, and access to Seattle via ferry when we like.

Yeah, well, everyone that lives in a city is alike. They just go to plays and drink fancy coffee /s

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sylvanz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/fbc32d/32.png) [@Sylvanz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sylvanz)\
**Post date:** [August 7, 2024, 8:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/77 "2024-08-07T20:05:56Z")

</div>

Umm, did I mention dar leaf? Look him up. He is an elected sheriff and he is indeed a fuckwit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GaryM](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/garym/32/241_2.png) [@GaryM](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GaryM)\
**Post date:** [August 8, 2024, 12:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/78 "2024-08-08T00:04:06Z")

</div>

> [@Bear\_Nenno](#):
>
> All of the departments in the area do. Even the Tribal police, Federal and State agencies. They all use the county jail.

My Sheriff’s dept runs the jail and courts. They house some federal, and perhaps state prisoners in the jail and charge for it. Every week there’s a report in the paper listing total inmates and how many are federal or other agencies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beckdawrek](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/beckdawrek/32/3647_2.png) [@Beckdawrek](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beckdawrek)\
**Post date:** [August 8, 2024, 12:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/79 "2024-08-08T00:18:22Z")

</div>

I can do that better at home, in the country🤭

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [August 8, 2024, 12:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347/80 "2024-08-08T00:24:12Z")

</div>

I’m curious whether the OP is annoyed about the apparent duplication of sevices in their home urban/suburban jurisdiction or is concerned about the SovCit or Fascist tendencies of more rural sheriffs nationwide.

Both are legit issues but they need different solutions.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-we-lose-anything-if-we-ended-all-sheriffs-departments/1005347.md?page=5)
