It’s fucking easy. None of that involves profit. I don’t know why in the world you think it does. You could also sue your grandmother for not giving you a fair share of her estate when she dies. That doesn’t make your grandmother a business. Owning shit doesn’t make you a business.
There are a few churches that are a business in disguise, and, guess what? They get in a lot of fucking trouble when this is figured out. Benny Hinn was a recent example.
The thing that’s even worse is, let’s say that you are right about those particular churches. You are advocating that all churches be treated as businesses. You aren’t arguing that the ones who are acting as businesses be treated as such. Do you know what it’s called when you extrapolate from a small group to the larger group? Discrimination.
And, I’m sorry, but the second you advocate discrimination against religion, you lose me. The only reason why you are allowed to be an atheist is that concept. So, go ahead, establish it. Then we’ll establish that all atheists are also businesses.
You mean the one that calls Scientology a business instead of a religion? You think we disagree with that? That’s why even people like me who are strongly for freedom of religion are against Scientology.
How is this logic supposed to work? Scientology says it is a religion. Scientology is really a business. Therefore all religions are really a business.
Sorry, post 23 slipped through. I’ve quoted it below for reference. I have no interest in defending either Scientology or churches that appear, from at least that video, clearly violating their charter. I’m sure the reasoning is that the church’s board of directors has decided that the salary they have set for their pastor is appropriate. I’d hardly call that a standard example of the law at work, though.
Edit: This just goes back to miss elizabeth’s confusion between “some” and “many”. I have absolutely no qualms with stating that there are a number of churches out there running afoul of the law, and that the IRS should crack down on them. But *some *of the churches doing that doesn’t mean *many *of them are, or even constitute anything but a tiny fraction of the whole.
This definition, which stpauler quoted from Wikipedia, is typical of why Wikipedia should never be treated as an authoritative source. Wikipedia is often wrong, and it’s certainly wrong in this case. A quick consultation with my friend Webster informs me that a business is “a profit-seeking enterprise or concern”. Moreover, this is obviously what people generally mean when they use the word ‘business’ in daily life. Profit-seeking is a necessary part of what makes a business a business, both in day-to-day speech and legally. Wikipedia is therefore wrong.
Actually, from what I’ve read getting your phd or masters helps very little salary-wise in most fields. I doubt a philosophy or art history PhD grad starts any better than your wife will.
On average, undergrad degrees are more useful than philosophy, art history or theology undergrad degrees. But regardless, priests/pastors often have supplements to their salary- housing allowances and pay specific to extra duties they perform. For the heck of it, I looked up average salaries as ITR suggested. USA average is $55,000 with many Synods over 60, some approaching 70 thousand.
Starting average for Philosophy- $39,900.00, Art History $35,800.00 , Religion $34,100.00
Few churches have any substantial income other than freely-given contributions, and most have nothing that could be considered profits. If gifts to the church can be taxed at 90%, then all gifts should be. The $10 you give to your nephew for his birthday ought to be taxed $9 for the government.
Any club can become tax exempt – well if it is, that is. But any club cannot get a tax exemption from paying property tax. So the golf club where on Sunday morning I go commune with nature (or might if I actually played golf) must pay property tax but the church does not. What is exempt from property tax is a not-for-profit organization that has specific purposes: charitable, educational, hospital, religious. (at least in NY other places may vary)
How exactly can a government define what is and what is not “religious” without violating the Constitution? Why is sitting on a hard bench and looking through stained glass windows religious, but playing billiards in a private club not religious?