# Would You Have Been Dreyfusard or Anti-Dreyfusard?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [February 8, 2011, 4:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622 "2011-02-08T04:01:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/f04885/32.png) [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qin_Shi_Huangdi)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2011, 4:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/1 "2011-02-08T04:01:24Z")

</div>

If you lived in France in the late 19th Century would you have been Dreyfusard or anti-Dreyfusard? Remember its not “you” but a somewhat transferred version of “you” (ie if you’re socialist you’re still socialist) “edited” for 19th Century France. As a Protestant anticlerical moderate bourgeois liberal I almost certainly would have been Dreyfusard (due to the Protestants in France being felt threatened by the hardline Catholic conservatives most were pro-republican and liberal in the Third Republic).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Claverhouse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/13edae/32.png) [@Claverhouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Claverhouse)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2011, 6:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/2 "2011-02-08T06:31:05Z")

</div>

As a non-religious legitimist I hope I would consider the matter unproven either way as the affaire developed — not that I should care what the Republic does or what happens to it’s military servants — however, as in most of these cases there is not enough evidence produced to the public in sufficient time for any reasoned judgement to be made. Most of the participants ran on emotion ( them being nineteenth century Frenchmen especially emphasises this: they quivered with thrilled emotion just choosing a meal back then ); and the Army was the most paranoid and sentimental of all.  
Amusingly, the great Wilhelm sent his personal guarantee to France that Dreyfus was not the person who sent the information gained. They totally ignored this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lumpy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lumpy/32/446_2.png) [@Lumpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lumpy)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2011, 11:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/3 "2011-02-08T23:22:48Z")

</div>

Above all, don’t discuss The Affair at dinner: [File:Caran-d-ache-dreyfus-supper.jpg - Wikimedia Commons](http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Caran-d-ache-dreyfus-supper.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elfkin477](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/a9a28c/32.png) [@elfkin477](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elfkin477)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2011, 11:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/4 "2011-02-08T23:36:14Z")

</div>

Qin, you’re a good kid, but your historical-political polls like this will get more response if you bear in mind that a lot of us never took World History and give a brief description of what the heck you’re talking rather than forcing us to go read up on it on Wiki.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 12:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/5 "2011-02-09T00:12:47Z")

</div>

I would have been a Dreyfusard. While there was a lot of context to the issue, the fundamental evidence of Dreyfus’ innocence was overwhelming. The Anti-Dreyfusards were essentially arguing that his actual guilt or innocence didn’t matter - admitting that he had been framed would cause too much damage to the nation so Dreyfus had to be sacrificed even if he was innocent. I don’t agree with that kind of idea - the damage of institutionalizing a lie is worse in the long run than the damge of admitting it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kyla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/eada6e/32.png) [@Kyla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kyla)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 12:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/6 "2011-02-09T00:29:55Z")

</div>

> [@elfkin477](#):
>
> Qin, you’re a good kid, but your historical-political polls like this will get more response if you bear in mind that a lot of us never took World History and give a brief description of what the heck you’re talking rather than forcing us to go read up on it on Wiki.

I kind of like how he does this, though. It’s like he’s learning about a topic in school, thinks about it, and comes to us to ask what we think about it. It’s probably a good way to learn more about the topic and get other perspectives. He’s a pretty typical self-absorbed teenager in the sense that he doesn’t realize that all of this is a vague memory an old history class.

Anyway, I’m Jewish, so take a wild guess. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackmannii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jackmannii/32/311_2.png) [@Jackmannii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackmannii)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 12:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/7 "2011-02-09T00:37:48Z")

</div>

But _of course_ I would have been anti-Dreyfusard! One must support the Army in all things, for l’Armee, c’est la France!!!

That whole “Dreyfus is innocent” claim, it’s an invention of France’s enemies designed to cast our sacred institutions into ill-repute! The Germans, the English, and above all the Jews are behind it!

Vive La France! Vive La France! Vive…  
Nah, screw it, I’d have been a Dreyfusard. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sir\_Not\_Appearing\_on\_This\_Site](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/7cd45c/32.png) [@Sir\_Not\_Appearing\_on\_This\_Site](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sir_Not_Appearing_on_This_Site)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 1:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/8 "2011-02-09T01:31:58Z")

</div>

But, but, Richard Dreyfus wasn’t alive in the 19th century…however, I did like Mr. Holland’s Opus and Jaws, so he has that going for him…

(I have no idea what the OP is about.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lumpy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lumpy/32/446_2.png) [@Lumpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lumpy)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 2:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/9 "2011-02-09T02:15:44Z")

</div>

> [@Jackmannii](#):
>
> That whole “Dreyfus is innocent” claim, it’s an invention of France’s enemies designed to cast our sacred institutions into ill-repute! The Germans, the English, and above all the Jews are behind it!

Not just the Jews either, but the evil Syndicate:

> [@](#):
>
> Right-wing papers representing nationalists, the church, and professional antisemites repeated the lie that a “Syndicate” was behind the forces advocating revision. The “Syndicate” was a conspiracy of Jews, bankrolled by Jewish bankers and directed by the Germans. It was bent on destroying the Church, the Army, and France itself. Evidence of the Army’s forgeries was itself forged by agents of the “Syndicate” which had spent ten million francs “for corrupting judges and handwriting experts, suborning journalists and ministers.” Earlier clerical and royalist newspapers had accused the Jews of secret plots and malignant powers. "All the arguments which the Jew had inspired as the perennial stranger who persisted in retaining his own identity were revived. Jews were not Frenchmen; they were aliens within the French body, probably conspiring against France, certainly against the Church; they were promoters of the anti-clerical movement and enemies of Catholic _bien-pensants_

\*-\*Barbara Tuchman, _ **The Proud Tower.** _

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Claverhouse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/13edae/32.png) [@Claverhouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Claverhouse)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 4:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/10 "2011-02-09T04:37:09Z")

</div>

It may be as well to recall that whilst it was horrible he was sent to such a terrible camp, both Louis-Napoleon and the Third Republic sent a hell of a lot of Frenchmen to Cayenne and Devil’s Island etc., often for political reasons, such as communist sympathies, which wouldn’t be a crime now, and others for serial criminality, and nobody ever worries about their innocence or guilt, or their sufferings. Dreyfus was lucky during his long martyrdom that his case was flagged by a vigorous defence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malleus\_Incus\_Stapes](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/malleus_incus_stapes/32/3293_2.png) [@Malleus\_Incus\_Stapes](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malleus_Incus_Stapes)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 7:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/11 "2011-02-09T19:39:42Z")

</div>

As a Jew, I’d be on the side where people weren’t shouting death threats because of my religion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rocketeer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rocketeer/32/4437_2.png) [@Rocketeer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rocketeer)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 8:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/12 "2011-02-09T20:47:31Z")

</div>

I’m an Establishment kind of guy who tends to go along with the crowd, so I’d probably be an anti-Dreyfusard, at least at first.

But I do eventually wake up, so I’d be a Dreyfusard by the end.

From my enlightened twenty-first-century perspective, the antis seem like bigoted authoritarian jerks, and all their arguments boil down to “I don’t want to admit I was wrong.” Not exactly compelling…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lisiate](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/f05b48/32.png) [@lisiate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lisiate)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 11:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/13 "2011-02-09T23:29:02Z")

</div>

I’m with Rocketeer - I strongly suspect I would have been an Anti until after’s Zola’s expose and maybe right up until the Court of Cassation verdict.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![clairobscur](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/839c29/32.png) [@clairobscur](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/clairobscur)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2011, 12:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/14 "2011-02-10T00:20:29Z")

</div>

I mistakenly voted anti-dreyfusard.  
I’m a leftist atheist, which means that all things being equal I would have been a republican rabidly anti-clerical at the time. So, it would have been pretty much mandatory to be a dreyfusard too for me.

There were quite strong political demarcation lines at the time, and the dreyfusard/anti-dreyfusard issue strongly tended to follow those lines. Being anti-dreyfusard would have been tantamount to treason for my circle of friend, and they might have suspected me of other horrible thoughts and deeds, like being a secret church-goer or something.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lumpy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lumpy/32/446_2.png) [@Lumpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lumpy)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2011, 12:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/15 "2011-02-10T00:57:32Z")

</div>

> [@Rocketeer](#):
>
> I’m an Establishment kind of guy who tends to go along with the crowd, so I’d probably be an anti-Dreyfusard, at least at first.
> 
> But I do eventually wake up, so I’d be a Dreyfusard by the end.
> 
> From my enlightened twenty-first-century perspective, the antis seem like bigoted authoritarian jerks, and all their arguments boil down to “I don’t want to admit I was wrong.” Not exactly compelling..

“But, but- what about _honor?!_” (:rolleyes:)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackmannii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jackmannii/32/311_2.png) [@Jackmannii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackmannii)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2011, 1:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/16 "2011-02-10T01:11:53Z")

</div>

> [@Claverhouse](#):
>
> It may be as well to recall that whilst it was horrible he was sent to such a terrible camp, both Louis-Napoleon and the Third Republic sent a hell of a lot of Frenchmen to Cayenne and Devil’s Island etc., often for political reasons, such as communist sympathies, which wouldn’t be a crime now, and others for serial criminality, and nobody ever worries about their innocence or guilt, or their sufferings. Dreyfus was lucky during his long martyrdom that his case was flagged by a vigorous defence.

True - I always wondered why they made a big honking fuss over the Scottsboro Boys when a lot of other people were wrongly convicted in those days. :dubious:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SecondJudith](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5ac83/32.png) [@SecondJudith](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SecondJudith)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2011, 10:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/17 "2011-02-10T10:57:37Z")

</div>

> [@Malleus\_Incus\_Stapes](#):
>
> As a Jew, I’d be on the side where people weren’t shouting death threats because of my religion.

Or, you know, whichever side was shouting _fewest_ death threats because of our religion. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2011, 11:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/18 "2011-02-10T11:14:16Z")

</div>

Dreyfusard, although of course that’s much easier to say with the benefit of hindsight. But I’m a big fan of accountability in public institutions, and the thought of sacrificing an innocent man to save face for the authorities is anathema to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hypnagogic\_Jerk](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hypnagogic_jerk/32/4252_2.png) [@Hypnagogic\_Jerk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hypnagogic_Jerk)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2011, 6:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/19 "2011-02-10T18:53:22Z")

</div>

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> Dreyfusard, although of course that’s much easier to say with the benefit of hindsight.

Yes. How am I to know what my position on a more than a century old political debate in another country would have been if I’d been there at the time? It’s really impossible to say. We know now that the dreyfusards were right, so we may very well pat ourselves on the back by telling ourselves that we’d have been among them, but how are we to know?

I cannot answer this question; it’s just not possible to put the political being that I am today in late 19th century France and expect that it’d be the same.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![handsomeharry](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/e9c0ed/32.png) [@handsomeharry](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/handsomeharry)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2011, 3:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622/20 "2011-02-11T03:31:48Z")

</div>

> [@Sir\_Not\_Appearing\_on\_This\_Site](#):
>
> But, but, Richard Dreyfus wasn’t alive in the 19th century…however, I did like Mr. Holland’s Opus and Jaws, so he has that going for him…
> 
> (I have no idea what the OP is about.)

No, I think you’re on the right track: Are you for him or against him? It’s not that hard.  
Good thing I’m here, to help you stay smart!

btw, wasn’t R. Dreyfus in a movie about the Dreyfus affair?

Best wishes,  
hh

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-have-been-dreyfusard-or-anti-dreyfusard/570622.md?page=2)
