# Would you support US/EU/NATO direct military action to defend Ukraine?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Tags:** ukraine-invasion\
**Created:** [March 2, 2022, 5:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359 "2022-03-02T17:54:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Al128](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/al128/32/16541_2.png) [@Al128](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Al128)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2022, 7:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/202 "2022-03-13T19:20:48Z")

</div>

> [@Sage\_Rat](#):
>
> My understanding is that after WWII ended and the Japanese realized that they’d been lied to the whole time by their government on the status of the effort, there was a very strong and immediate switch to resenting the previous administration.
> 
> They were very receptive to American governance afterwards.

while true, I would venture the guess that it was not really possible en japan in the 1940ies to get “decent neutral information” … in russia in 2022 this is not the case …

I think there is a lot of trumpism going on in russia, where people CHOSE to only access certain information (and chose to not access other neutral sources) - to confirm their opinions.

**we did not know** - is not a valid answer in 2022 for somebody who owns a smartphone or computer (unless you are 84 and living in a village in sibiria)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Al128](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/al128/32/16541_2.png) [@Al128](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Al128)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2022, 7:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/203 "2022-03-13T19:29:06Z")

</div>

the point here is - i think - you could be in a strategically way better position by making a statement that includes “ambiguity”.

_We have no imediate plans to get involved but will revise this decision and reserve all necessary steps if the situation clearly escalates and we see war-crimes, WMD,etc… Of course diplomacy is the preferred way, BUT …_

Now you loaded a brick-ton of “rather think twice before you do THIS” on Putin and his 3 stooges

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2022, 3:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/204 "2022-03-14T03:09:25Z")

</div>

> [@BeepKillBeep](#):
>
> They can pay for it with confiscated (abandoned) Russian tanks and vehicles.

Hell, they could probably set up a Gofundme and get millions in donations.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2022, 3:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/205 "2022-03-15T15:24:01Z")

</div>

Heck, they are kind of getting that already. The US is sending over several hundred million in emergency aid, and I understand Europe is talking about 400 million euros in additional aid as well. But if they set up a private gofundme, I’d be in for $20. 😆

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschrodinger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschrodinger/32/122_2.png) [@eschrodinger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschrodinger)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2022, 4:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/206 "2022-03-15T16:54:05Z")

</div>

> [@Procrustus](#):
>
> I agree. There is absolutely nothing Russia could do about it if their U.N. (or security council) credentials were revoked.  
> On the other hand, the whole point of the U.N. is to bring hostile opponents to the table. Even though it’s clearly not working, you would really undermine the mission of the U.N. if you started kicking out states that misbehave.

I don’t think anyone is talking about kicking Russia out of the UN. Just revoking its permanent seat on the Security Council, which allows it to veto any actions the UN might try to take against it.

However, I think China might not go along, not because it supports Russia, but because it’s subject to the same argument about taking over a predecessor government’s UNSC seat.

There has been some movement toward eliminating or otherwise reforming the permanent seats on the UNSC system, but of course it will never happen because any single member of the UNSC can veto it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sage\_Rat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sage_rat/32/399_2.png) [@Sage\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sage_Rat)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2022, 5:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/207 "2022-03-15T17:11:53Z")

</div>

> [@eschrodinger](#):
>
> However, I think China might not go along, not because it supports Russia, but because it’s subject to the same argument about taking over a predecessor government’s UNSC seat.

If the argument for removal is that they aren’t really the USSR then sure. If the argument for removal is that the purpose of the UN is to stop nations from invading one another, and it makes zero sense for someone guilty of that to be in a top-level position, then no.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2022, 6:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/208 "2022-03-15T18:17:21Z")

</div>

> [@Sage\_Rat](#):
>
> If the argument for removal is that the purpose of the UN is to stop nations from invading one another, and it makes zero sense for someone guilty of that to be in a top-level position, then no.

If that’s the justification I don’t think the USA would want to go in on that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elmer\_J.Fudd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/elmer_j.fudd/32/1211_2.png) [@Elmer\_J.Fudd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elmer_J.Fudd)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2022, 6:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/209 "2022-03-15T18:33:11Z")

</div>

> [@eschrodinger](#):
>
> I don’t think anyone is talking about kicking Russia out of the UN. Just revoking its permanent seat on the Security Council, which allows it to veto any actions the UN might try to take against it.

If that’s the reasoning, then the answer isn’t kicking Russia out of its permanent seat. The answer is getting rid of permanent seats altogether and the special privileges (like veto power) that come with them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sage\_Rat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sage_rat/32/399_2.png) [@Sage\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sage_Rat)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2022, 6:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/210 "2022-03-15T18:50:36Z")

</div>

> [@RickJay](#):
>
> If that’s the justification I don’t think the USA would want to go in on that.

If no one held a vote on the subject then how’s that our problem?

I, personally, would be willing to say that the US should step down from the UNSC until it’s handed over GW Bush and Bill Clinton to the ICC. But, from a practical standpoint, it’s a fairly common norm that if some crime goes unpunished for long enough then it’s considered water under the bridge. It’s also common for people to say things like, “the wealthy should pay more taxes” while themselves being wealthy and using every rule in the book to pay lower taxes. Taking advantage of the rules as they are doesn’t mean that a person believes that the rules are as they should be.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschrodinger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschrodinger/32/122_2.png) [@eschrodinger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschrodinger)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2022, 6:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/211 "2022-03-15T18:53:49Z")

</div>

> [@Elmer\_J.Fudd](#):
>
> If that’s the reasoning, then the answer isn’t kicking Russia out of its permanent seat. The answer is getting rid of permanent seats altogether and the special privileges (like veto power) that come with them.

Yes, as I mentioned, there is a movement to do that. But, any member of the Security Council can veto any such change to the UN charter, so…I wish them luck, I guess.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![msmith537](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d9b06d/32.png) [@msmith537](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/msmith537)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2022, 9:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/212 "2022-03-15T21:20:14Z")

</div>

> [@FoieGrasIsEvil](#):
>
> I mean, even America often extends combat tours without consent so I cannot imagine Putin allowing that.
> 
> -The thinking that this is a ruse and Russia is just “holding back it’s best” is interesting and at least _somewhat_ plausible, right? I remember hearing somewhere recently the question posed “Where Is Russia’s Air Force”? I mean…is this _really_ the best they have…or _all_ they have? Where is all this stuff I thought they had?

[Maybe Russia doesn’t have as much stuff as you think.](https://i.redd.it/eid22i0ushk81.png)  
[Ukraine also has a fairly significant military.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJqeKuxXEAU9kac.jpg)

It is possible that Russia is holding back the bulk of it’s forces for a future larger war with NATO. But that also presumes Putin thinks he’s in a position to win such a war.

War isn’t just about raw numbers though. A big part of it is getting your forces in the right place and being able to support them.

[Also, apparently the Ukrainians destroyed the “Go fuck yourself” ship last week.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRIpqb37ePU)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2022, 1:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/213 "2022-03-16T01:57:30Z")

</div>

I think if the UN voted to send in peacekeepers en masse, and the vote was overwhelming, and almost every country was represented in the peace keeping force, then I would support US and NATO military involvement in Ukraine. But short of that, not right now, IMO. Too risky.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2022, 2:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/214 "2022-03-16T02:03:14Z")

</div>

Something like that would go before the UNSC…and, can you guess how Russia would vote? 😛 Simply, it’s not going to happen. If it was going to be decided, it would be NATO itself, and I don’t see that happening. The US is opposed to direct engagement for one thing, so that’s pretty much it. I don’t think the US would shift its position (unless something really drastic happened) at this stage, and without the US NATO simply couldn’t go into Ukraine to do much of anything.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foolsguinea](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foolsguinea/32/14751_2.png) [@foolsguinea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/foolsguinea)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2022, 6:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/215 "2022-03-16T18:45:04Z")

</div>

I expect that the war will broaden eventually, even if the US, UK, & France drag their heels. And it should. A crushed Ukraine is terrifying to places like Georgia, Kazakhstan, Finland, Armenia, but also a huge problem for NATO members Poland, Slovakia, Romania.

We will be in a conventional war with Russia, if maybe not this year. And given that France & the US are nuclear powers ourselves, we can exploit that. Make Russia afraid of continued warfare; no one wants to accidentally start a nuclear exchange.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KidCharlemagne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ed8c4c/32.png) [@KidCharlemagne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KidCharlemagne)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2022, 5:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/216 "2022-03-17T17:08:45Z")

</div>

Well we may have a fight thrust upon us. I have no idea of the validity but it sounds real and seems very Putinesque. This guy has been translating letters supposedly originating from a US/Iran analyst in the FSB to a Russian dissident living in France. The gist is that to stay in power, Putin will declare a defensive war on the West that potentially includes shelling Poland and/or the Baltics to scare NATO into a quick compromise. Again, can’t speak to authenticity.

> **[Putin expects the West to blink in the face of his threats - 6th letter from...](https://www.igorsushko.com/2022/03/putin-expects-west-to-blink-in-face-of.html)**
>
> Learn about the origins & context of the #FSBletters from the #WindofChange to Vladimir Osechkin, a Russian human-rights activist exiled in France.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BeepKillBeep](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/9e8a1a/32.png) [@BeepKillBeep](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BeepKillBeep)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2022, 6:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/217 "2022-03-17T18:47:33Z")

</div>

If true, Putin is ultra-forked. The Russian army is losing to Ukraine. I would argue that in the land battle Russia has in fact already lost, they just don’t know it yet. NATO will cut up whatever remains of their forces in no time. The only reason the Russian army has not been pushed out of Ukraine is air power, and Russia cannot compete with NATO in air power.

I find it personally hard to believe unless Putin is delusional, which I do not think he is. I think he’s perfectly sane, but miscalculated badly on Ukraine and now cannot back out without “having an accident”. None-the-less, he cannot possibly be seeing the situation in Ukraine and then looking at NATO and saying “Ock, we can take 'em” in his best dwarvish accent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sage\_Rat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sage_rat/32/399_2.png) [@Sage\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sage_Rat)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2022, 6:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/218 "2022-03-17T18:56:09Z")

</div>

> [@KidCharlemagne](#):
>
> [Igor Sushko - #FSBletters from the Wind of Change inside the FSB (KGB) - Racing & Beyond: Putin expects the West to blink in the face of his threats - 6th letter from the Wind of Change inside the FSB](http://www.igorsushko.com/2022/03/putin-expects-west-to-blink-in-face-of.html)

The part at the beginning about Iran seems like it’s an extension of an earlier discussion - but I don’t see it. I’m not sure what war they’re expecting between the US and Iran?

At the very end, it says that they’ve evaluated that France wouldn’t be willing to fight.

Given that France is the leading force in trying to establish a EU army, I’d find that assessment to be questionable. If anything, if there is a fight with Russia it’s more likely to come from a unified EU military force than NATO, at the moment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2022, 7:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/219 "2022-03-17T19:03:22Z")

</div>

> [@BeepKillBeep](#):
>
> The Russian army is losing to Ukraine.

I think this is a vast overstatement. It’s not going well for Russia, they are having a lot more issues and problems…but they aren’t losing. I really think people are getting way ahead of themselves with all of the enthusiasm and looking at things from the perspective of seeing what they want to see and seeing the data that reinforces their preconceptions and conclusions. Putin, I think, did exactly the same thing in the run up to this cluster fuck…he cherry picked the data, had a bunch of folks telling him what he wanted to hear…then, seemed really angry and confused when things didn’t work out the way he wanted them too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2022, 7:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/220 "2022-03-17T19:06:35Z")

</div>

> [@KidCharlemagne](#):
>
> Putin will declare a defensive war on the West that potentially includes shelling Poland and/or the Baltics to scare NATO into a quick compromise.

This is like someone thinking that pouring gasoline on a fire is the best way to extinguish it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Airbeck](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/airbeck/32/6574_2.png) [@Airbeck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Airbeck)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2022, 7:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359/221 "2022-03-17T19:13:21Z")

</div>

They are losing by the metric of failing to achieve any of their objectives while losing more soldiers in a few weeks than we did in 20 years in Afghanistan and Iraq. NATO is stronger. Ukraine is still Ukraine. Putin is farther away from reuniting the USSR. Russia is economically fucked for the foreseeable future. Can you think of any measure where they have achieved an improvement in an area they were looking to find improvement before the invasion? I can’t.

Yes, they are causing a lot of destruction and death, but I that doesn’t equate to winning. I’ve seen no expert on this that thinks they can take and hold Kyiv or that they can withstand a long term insurgent resistance.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359.md?page=10)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/would-you-support-us-eu-nato-direct-military-action-to-defend-ukraine/960359.md?page=12)
