# WW I, Korea, WW II and Israel; Heads You Win Should Not be Tails I Lose

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ww-i-korea-ww-ii-and-israel-heads-you-win-should-not-be-tails-i-lose/806094>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [January 8, 2018, 1:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ww-i-korea-ww-ii-and-israel-heads-you-win-should-not-be-tails-i-lose/806094 "2018-01-08T01:17:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2018, 1:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ww-i-korea-ww-ii-and-israel-heads-you-win-should-not-be-tails-i-lose/806094/101 "2018-01-18T01:41:58Z")

</div>

> [@Boozahol\_Squid\_P.I](#):
>
> I don’t think that couching the start of WWI as a Germanic (Austrian, specifically) land grab is actually unreasonable. While we’re all familiar with the series of alliances that caused the war to expand into a World War that can’t be placed on the backs of the Austrians, the 10 Point Ultimatum wasn’t merely a demand for the Kingdom of Serbia to make reparations for the death of Uncle Ferdy, but a requirement for the nation to be absorbed into the Empire at worst, or to be a puppet state at best. The Austrians didn’t expect Serbia to comply, and were intent on conquest from the get-go.

Every European power wanted to go to war for any number of (usually) stupid reasons. Germany gets to take the fall for firing the first shot, but without the eager way in which Britain, France, Italy, Austria-Hungary, Turkey, and even Russia picked sides and jumped in, the war would have been a local brush fire.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mk\_VII](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/5f9b8f/32.png) [@Mk\_VII](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mk_VII)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2018, 8:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ww-i-korea-ww-ii-and-israel-heads-you-win-should-not-be-tails-i-lose/806094/102 "2018-01-18T20:57:36Z")

</div>

As late as a week before, Asquith was still thinking that Britain would stand aside from the coming war.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boozahol\_Squid\_P.I](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/d9b06d/32.png) [@Boozahol\_Squid\_P.I](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boozahol_Squid_P.I)\
**Post date:** [January 19, 2018, 7:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ww-i-korea-ww-ii-and-israel-heads-you-win-should-not-be-tails-i-lose/806094/103 "2018-01-19T19:22:42Z")

</div>

> [@tomndebb](#):
>
> Every European power wanted to go to war for any number of (usually) stupid reasons. Germany gets to take the fall for firing the first shot, but without the eager way in which Britain, France, Italy, Austria-Hungary, Turkey, and even Russia picked sides and jumped in, the war would have been a local brush fire.

It was possible for the war to be started by any number of circumstances, sure, but France didn’t seize Spanish possessions in Morocco; Italy didn’t try to reclaim Savoy. Austria _did_ try to finish consolidating their buffer empire against the Ottomans, and Germany _was_ the first one to pre-emptively declare war against other major powers without an explicit cause.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2018, 3:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ww-i-korea-ww-ii-and-israel-heads-you-win-should-not-be-tails-i-lose/806094/104 "2018-01-20T03:58:23Z")

</div>

> [@Boozahol\_Squid\_P.I](#):
>
> It was possible for the war to be started by any number of circumstances, sure, but France didn’t seize Spanish possessions in Morocco; Italy didn’t try to reclaim Savoy. Austria _did_ try to finish consolidating their buffer empire against the Ottomans, and Germany _was_ the first one to pre-emptively declare war against other major powers without an explicit cause.

Which is why I noted that they took the fall. It is unlikely that Britain would have initiated an attack on the Continent, (although attacks on German Africa are less unlikely), but the idea that by 1925 France would have tried to recover land lost after the 1870 conflict or Italy would have been willing to seize more of the northern Adriatic are not implausible. And looking at the various (un)diplomatic exchanges among Britain, France, Germany, and others leading up to the war in 1914 indicate that all the major parties were desirous of a war.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dissonance](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/85f322/32.png) [@Dissonance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dissonance)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2018, 8:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ww-i-korea-ww-ii-and-israel-heads-you-win-should-not-be-tails-i-lose/806094/105 "2018-01-20T08:13:21Z")

</div>

> [@tomndebb](#):
>
> Every European power wanted to go to war for any number of (usually) stupid reasons. Germany gets to take the fall for firing the first shot, but without the eager way in which Britain, France, Italy, Austria-Hungary, Turkey, and even Russia picked sides and jumped in, the war would have been a local brush fire.

Of course Germany gets to take the fall for starting the war, that’s because they started the war. A local brushfire between whom exactly? Austria-Hungary and Serbia? That wasn’t going to happen without drawing Russia into it, which Austria-Hungary wasn’t going to do without the backing of Germany. Which Germany gladly gave with its blank check to Austria-Hungary. In one of that centuries greatest diplomatic screw-ups, making it clear that Germany was going to have its war regardless, Germany accidentally [handed Russia a declaration of war](https://wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/The_German_Declaration_of_War_on_Russia) giving its reason for doing so that Russia hadn’t ceased its mobilization and that it hadn’t deemed it necessary to respond to German demands that it ceased doing so. The German ambassador to Russia had forgotten to give only the reason that applied, so the declaration read:

> [@](#):
>
> The Imperial German Government have used every effort since the beginning of the crisis to bring about a peaceful settlement. In compliance with a wish expressed to him by His Majesty the Emperor of Russia, the German Emperor had undertaken, in concert with Great Britain, the part of mediator between the Cabinets of Vienna and St. Petersburg; but Russia, without waiting for any result, proceeded to a general mobilisation of her forces both on land and sea. In consequence of this threatening step, which was not justified by any military proceedings on the part of Germany, the German Empire was faced by a grave and imminent danger. If the German Government had failed to guard against this peril, they would have compromised the safety and the very existence of Germany. The German Government were, therefore, obliged to make representations to the Government of His Majesty the Emperor of All the Russias and to insist upon a cessation of the aforesaid military acts. Russia having refused to comply with [not having considered it necessary to answer]\* this demand, and having shown by this refusal [this attitude]\* that her action was directed against Germany, I have the honour, on the instructions of my Government, to inform your Excellency as follows:
> 
> His Majesty the Emperor, my august Sovereign, in the name of the German  
> Empire, accepts the challenge, and considers himself at war with Russia.
> 
> \*The words in brackets occur in the original.

To ‘protect’ itself from Russia, Germany then proceeded to invade Belgium, and demand France demobilize and surrender its border fortifications to German occupation for the duration of the war - a demand it knew was beyond unacceptable; German troops marching through Belgium were sweeping through to outflank the French border defenses and invade France through Belgium. It was only the invasion of Belgium that cemented Britain to commit to the war, as it was bound by the [Treaty of London](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_London_(1839)) to defend Belgium. Germany’s _only_ war plan in the event of a European war was to immediately invade Belgium, Luxemburg and France. From the moment Germany announced general mobilization it was committed to war, and a war starting this way as it was going to start delivering its armies to the Belgian border. Germany was the only nation that inexorably committed itself to war with no possibility of actual negotiations by the act of declaring mobilization. The Ottoman Empire, far from eagerly picking sides and jumping in declared itself neutral and was only persuaded to jump in after Germany bribed it with by giving it the battlecruiser _Goeben_ and the light cruiser _Breslau_ as well as pledging to provide gold loans to finance the war. Italy, even further from jumping right in, declared its neutrality, and withdrew from the Triple Alliance with Germany and Austria-Hungary on the grounds that it was defensive in nature. Italy wouldn’t join the war until 1915.

Sure, the war was greeting with a naïve enthusiasm and popularity by all nations when it began. That doesn’t absolve Germany from beginning it, or make them the fall guy for starting it on the grounds that it isn’t implausible that France might have hypothetically gone to war over Alsace-Lorraine by 1925 if Germany hadn’t started the war in 1914.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ww-i-korea-ww-ii-and-israel-heads-you-win-should-not-be-tails-i-lose/806094.md?page=5)
