I’ve only even driven stick-shift cars, and learned to drive pretty easily, but I can sympathise with the OP’s worries. When I was learning, gear-changing was easily the hardest part of the whole thing to get consistently right. I seriously began to wonder if I’d ever learn. As others have said, though, you do, and it becomes second nature (I was going to say “becomes automatic”, but that would be a bad pun). You really don’t think about it at all, and wonder what all that fuss was about.
So, for several years, I drove a variety of cars and vans, and did OK. Then along came an old Simca 1100 (spit) which I had for a year. The synchro mechanisms had pretty much all failed, meaning I had to learn to ‘double-declutch’ the damned thing. My father, who had driven trucks with “crash” - ie no synchro - gearboxes in the Army, gave me a quick primer on the technique, and then it was back to gear-change frustration as I learned how to do it properly.
For those who need an explanation, my understanding is that when you change gear, and engage the new gear, the synchro is the device that matches the speed of rotation of the cogs as they come together, meaning that as you engage the clutch, it all happens smoothly. Without a synchro, this does not happen, so you get the awful grinding and lack of engagement, a bit like trying to change without using the clutch at all. This is not recommended unless buying new gearboxes is a hobby of yours.
Double-declutching is the work-around. What you’re essentially doing is getting the engine side of the gearbox to match the speed of the road-wheels side, putting it crudely, and you do this by controlling the gas and clutch thusly (from old memory, there might be mistakes):
- Clutch in
- Shift into neutral
- Clutch out
- Use gas pedal to get engine speed right for new gear (tough bit)
- Clutch in
- Shift into new gear
- Clutch out
That’s seven steps compared to three with a synchro box, and I found it damned tricky to master, especially when shifting down. But, surprise, surprise, after a while I could change gear flawlessly on that damned Simca. After a year, when the Simca finally collapsed in a heap, I bought a normal car and didn’t need to do all that stuff anymore. But … I found I was a much better gear-changer than I had been pre-Simca, because I’d learned the art of precise gas control during a gear change, and could even make shifts like 4 to 2 quickly without the slightest jolt. People would actually comment on my smooth gear changes.
Note that this isn’t boasting - I’ve always been an average driver at best, and would imagine that anyone with a similar experience would have a similar outcome.
After all that, a piggy-back question, which by coincidence cropped up in my mind while I was passenger in a car this afternoon. My ex-wife was driving, and she’s a fine driver (much better than me), but I noticed her doing something that always made me wince: “riding the clutch”. That means, for example, at a junction waiting for a gap, where the roadway’s not level, preventing the car from moving by keeping it in gear and partially engaging the clutch. I would use the handbrake (parking brake) in that situation, and not engage the clutch until I wanted to move. The reason is, because I was told that riding the clutch causes excessive wear on the clutch plates, so never do it! You’ll burn out the clutch in no time!
The question is: is this really still true? I was told that while learning in the 1970s, and cars have changed a lot since then. Is someone who routinely rides the clutch going to get significantly less mileage out of a set of clutch plates than a brake-user like myself? In fact, was it ever true?