# Yes, I know it is more expensive.  YES, I KNOW.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [November 2, 2001, 6:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085 "2001-11-02T06:31:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lazarus7](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/67e7ee/32.png) [@Lazarus7](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lazarus7)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 6:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/41 "2001-11-02T18:53:55Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Chas.E \*  
> \*\*Both you and your friend are incorrect. Macs are cheaper to own than PCs. The cost of a computer is far more than what you paid for the CPU. Many independent analysts have done research on “total lifetime cost of ownership” and the Mac always comes out way ahead of PeeCees. PCs are cheap to buy, but not cheap to own. \*\*

I would like to see some actual links on this.

I work in a mixed environment of PC/MAC in a school district. I can see that supporting the MACs is much more expensive than support the PCs.

All the TCO studies I have seen places MAC costs higher than PC costs but people are typically willing to pay these costs either because they are unaware of the concept of TCO or they feel that it is worth it (and I agree with them for certain purposes) or finally because they have pledged loyalty to the all holy church of Steve Jobs (MAC users are sooo fanatical).

$1000 to move a PC? … back that up m’boy. I have done entire labs of machines with lower billed costs including productivity loss so I would like to see the numbers on that. Could you also tell me the names of the guys doing the work so I can never hire them?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![E-Sabbath](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e19adc/32.png) [@E-Sabbath](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/E-Sabbath)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 7:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/42 "2001-11-02T19:05:41Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Lazarus7 \*  
> \*\*
> 
> I would like to see some actual links on this.
> 
> I work in a mixed environment of PC/MAC in a school district. I can see that supporting the MACs is much more expensive than support the PCs.

\*\*

You know, I’m curious myself. Frankly, I’d guess it evens out. PCs tend to thrash themselves more often… though that’s not always true. But when a Mac crashes, it tends to be more serious, and there’s less you can do about it to recover data and programs and settings, which is a cost in and of itself. The major difference would be replacement hardware, which is a commodity part for a PC, while not so for a Mac. On the other hand, these days, Macs and PCs share about half the hardware… memory, some video cards, hard drives.

> [@](#):
>
> \*\*  
> All the TCO studies I have seen places MAC costs higher than PC costs but people are typically willing to pay these costs either because they are unaware of the concept of TCO or they feel that it is worth it (and I agree with them for certain purposes) or finally because they have pledged loyalty to the all holy church of Steve Jobs (MAC users are sooo fanatical).

\*\*  
Please, let’s _not_ start this flame war. We’ve kept it down so far.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bernse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a9a28c/32.png) [@bernse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bernse)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 7:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/43 "2001-11-02T19:28:21Z")

</div>

You know, Macs cost more than comparably equipped PCs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![beagledave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/6de8d8/32.png) [@beagledave](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/beagledave)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 7:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/44 "2001-11-02T19:42:11Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by bernse \*  
> \*\*You know, Macs cost more than comparably equipped PCs. \*\*

Sigh. Regardless of the merits (or not) of that “factoid”…do you REALLY need to start that kind of flame fest…AGAIN?

Look at the post preceding your driveby post (I guess you missed it in your zeal to post)

“Please, let’s _not_ start this flame war. We’ve kept it down so far.”

Good advice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Abe\_Babe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3ab097/32.png) [@Abe\_Babe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Abe_Babe)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 7:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/45 "2001-11-02T19:46:08Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> **originally by SPOOFE**  
> Oh, and here’s one more thing that one should never skimp on: Underpants.

Don’t forget Fire and Boobs too.

IMHO, after I did extensive research on platforms, pumps, high heels, etc., I chose a PC because there were more games available.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chas.E](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e99b99/32.png) [@Chas.E](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chas.E)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 7:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/46 "2001-11-02T19:49:54Z")

</div>

FYI, I found a bootleg reprint on the web of Gartner Group’s analysis of PC/Mac support costs.

[http://www.bobrk.com/lmms/mac/gartner.html](http://www.bobrk.com/lmms/mac/gartner.html)

Conclusion: Macs are much cheaper to support than PCs, even in mixed Mac/PC environments. It further points out that PCs are not a heterogenous environment, the interoperability between different versions of Windows is more problematic than Mac/PC interoperability.

The biggest factor in TCO is support cost, not purchase price. If you want the precise TCO figures, you’ll have to buy the report from [http://www.gartnerweb.com](http://www.gartnerweb.com)

Furthermore, Macs are quite competitive with PCs on price, often coming in with more features and performance for the same bucks. Read this shootout:  
[http://www.aapltalk.com/shootouts/index.html](http://www.aapltalk.com/shootouts/index.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![E-Sabbath](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e19adc/32.png) [@E-Sabbath](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/E-Sabbath)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 8:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/47 "2001-11-02T20:01:42Z")

</div>

Doesn’t much matter which is easier to support in a mixed environment. The problem is the existance of the mixed environment, which makes support harder. Can I do it? Sure. But eight out of ten can’t. And yes, having mixed OSes is also a problem. This is why you pick an OS and stick with it. If you upgrade, roll it in gradually, but with precision.  
As for those numbers… no, I’ve had issues with the way the Gardner Group reports things. I’m no expert, but I’m fairly familiar, my father has been in market research all his life, from Resturant Business to Bruskin Goldring to J. D. Power and, well… to what we’re doing today, which I don’t think I should talk about. (But god is it cool.)  
And the more I learn, the more I agree with Mark Twain.

There are lies.

Damned lies.

And statistics.

These numbers may be accurate at this point in time, but at the time PCs were being adopted, they were _not_. And so… the race is lost, as far as most businesses are concerned. Because changing midstream is a good way to fall off the horse. Plus it’s a waste of existing infrastructure.

If there’s a strong competitive advantage, then go for it. If it’s parasitic, don’t bother.

And, of course, it’s a bear to find people to custom code applications for Macs. Unix or PC, much easier. Though with increased use of HTML/Java/Perl style applications, things are becoming less platform dependent… though IE 5.5 breaks a lot of stuff.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![E-Sabbath](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e19adc/32.png) [@E-Sabbath](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/E-Sabbath)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 8:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/48 "2001-11-02T20:11:14Z")

</div>

_CHOKE_!  
Good lord, I just looked at the bootleg report from early '95.

It’s Win 3.11 era.

That means, back in the day when modems were barely supported, before Com+.

When every program had a different video driver, and people did strange and odd things with kernel interrupts and programming on the bare metal for any application.

When every application behaved in a different manner, and there was no user interface definition.

Of _course_ Macs get the Ease of Use award. That was the point!  
You know, that was only six and a half years ago.  
Which is, more or less, eternity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![seawitch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a587f6/32.png) [@seawitch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/seawitch)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 8:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/49 "2001-11-02T20:11:38Z")

</div>

Yeesh, **Chas.** Do you spend Sunday mornings going door to door with pamphlets on this? Let it go, man.

The point of the OP was: it’s **her** money. She gets to buy what **she** wants. Your opinion on the matter is entirely unneccesary. If she wants to buy a $5000 ice sculpture and lick it until it goes away, it’s her money to spend.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Billy\_Rubin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/billy_rubin/32/3622_2.png) [@Billy\_Rubin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Billy_Rubin)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 8:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/50 "2001-11-02T20:18:13Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by seawitch \*  
> \*\*If she wants to buy a $5000 ice sculpture and lick it until it goes away, it’s her money to spend. \*\*

Dang, Seawitch, nice turn of phrase. I’d just like to _watch_ that.

b.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![E-Sabbath](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e19adc/32.png) [@E-Sabbath](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/E-Sabbath)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 8:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/51 "2001-11-02T20:20:42Z")

</div>

So…

Shoes. We seem to be in agreement on not scrimping on shoes.

Music is an odd thing. You don’t want to be an audiophile and spend 30k, most of the time, but scrimping too much is a waste. Good speakers, good amp, and the rest can deal well enough.

Tires… honestly, spending extra money on high-brand tires doesn’t seem to do much for me. Except for rain tires. On the other hand, if you’re talking about scrimping on retreads… bad idea, yes.

Brakes. Good point, yes, you want it done well…

But where do we spend the little extra and have it pay back?

Caffeine counts, yes.

If you had your druthers, a nice Aero chair _is_ all they’re cracked up to be. And considering most of us spend more time there than in bed… (Six to twelve hours at work sitting, compared to 4 in bed)

Basically, you want to spend a little more for quality on anything you will spend large amounts of your life using?

Or when you will spend very little comparative time using it, but expect rewards out of proportion to the time spent. (Ice Cream, yes?)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tiny\_ham](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/a183cd/32.png) [@tiny\_ham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tiny_ham)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/52 "2001-11-02T20:24:15Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Chas.E \*  
> \*\*FYI, I found a bootleg reprint on the web of Gartner Group’s analysis of PC/Mac support costs.  
> \*\*

Man.

You know you’re a geek when you’re bootlegging TECH SUPPORT ARTICLES

“I’ve got Pearl Jam, live in Seattle!”  
“Yeah? I’ve got rammstein, live in Hamburg!”  
“OH YEAH? I’ve got Comparitive Performances of Macs vs PC is a business environment…ON DISC!”

jar

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![yosemite](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/3ab097/32.png) [@yosemite](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/yosemite)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/53 "2001-11-02T20:24:58Z")

</div>

I second the toilet paper advice. Well, except that I don’t use the stuff with Aloe, but GOOD toilet paper is definitely worth it.

As far as Macs vs. PC: I have spent less money on repairs for my Macs. My iMac runs Photoshop better (Photoshop crashes semi frequently on the PC, it almost never crashes on my Mac). These are the MAIN issues for me. My old 266 MHz iMac ran Photoshop faster than my 450 MHz PC. (I did a test on my two machines. I know this for a fact.) These are issues for _me_, and me only. YMMV. I don’t frickin’ care about the latest games, but I do care about Photoshop. I made these choices based on my own experience, and my own feelings and opinions. (But I still like my PC. And I hear that HomeSite 5 is coming out! Woo hoo!)

My friend actually does spend money on things that are important to him. He spent an obscene amount of money on some wicked-fast SCSI hard drive with 20,000 RPM? Something absurdly fast, anyway. He also has a _very_ nice car.

He just doesn’t understand why I’d spend “more” for a Mac. He loves tinkering with his PCs so much, and it seems like he doesn’t understand that my priorities aren’t the same as his. Mac and PC are not interchangable. For me, it’s about the computing experience, and about the “user friendly” factor, and a few other intangible things.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PunditLisa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/4af34b/32.png) [@PunditLisa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PunditLisa)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 8:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/54 "2001-11-02T20:25:11Z")

</div>

1. Things not to skimp on:  
[ul]  
Shoes (it’s better to have 10 pair of well-made, comfortable shoes, than 300 pair of crappy shoes in every shade of the freaking rainbow)  
Paint  
Hair dresser (Trust me, if you pay $5 to get your hair cut, everyone knows that you spent$5 to get your hair cut.)  
Carpet  
Ice cream (I’m with you, seawitch)  
Mattress (you spend 1/3 of your life on it.)  
Sheets (See above. 250 count or more, 100% cotton. There will be no inferior poly/cotton blend sheets enveloping THIS bod.)  
[/ul]

2. I don’t own a MAC, but I’d still worship at Steve Jobs’ tabernacle any day. He’s hot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chas.E](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e99b99/32.png) [@Chas.E](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chas.E)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 8:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/55 "2001-11-02T20:26:00Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by E-Sabbath \*  
> \*\*_CHOKE_!  
> Good lord, I just looked at the bootleg report from early '95.
> 
> It’s Win 3.11 era.\*\*

It’s the best I can do for free, you can purchase more recent reports direct from Gartner. If you want to shoot down the assertion, you’ll need actual facts and research. But you won’t get any ammo from Gartner, because their more recent reports all show the same results. I would like to read the alleged CNet report, but so far, nobody’s given a link. At least I’m providing factual info.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![E-Sabbath](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e19adc/32.png) [@E-Sabbath](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/E-Sabbath)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 8:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/56 "2001-11-02T20:33:59Z")

</div>

It doesn’t _matter_ what you think!

No, honestly. It doesn’t matter which is objectively better.

The question is, what’s better for what situation?

Photoshop, until recently, always ran better on a Mac. There are issues with OS X, and I don’t know if they did the special whatever that they were planning to or not. If they did, then it’s a native application taking full advantage of the hardware, and will still run better on a Mac.

Macs are better for some things. And PCs are better for some things. And it’s not just the objective standards of the machines, it’s not just downtime, it’s training, expectation, intangibles, and compatibility.

For Yosemitebabe’s uses, macs are better. For her friend’s uses, PCs are better.

Me, I’m getting in my SUV, with my New Beetle parked in the bed, driving off to meet my girlfriend without kids in her minivan, and then we’re going to go mountain biking on ten speeds.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rjung](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/45deac/32.png) [@rjung](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rjung)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 8:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/57 "2001-11-02T20:37:41Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by magdalene \*  
> **Chas.E., is there a subject under the sun that you are NOT an expert on, privy to some special knowledge that for some reason you can’t share with the rest of us? Could you perhaps move yourself to quote the paragraph from the relevant Garrett report to us?**

If it helps any, folks, I’ve got electronic copies of the excerpts Garner Report that **Chas.E** is referring to. I’d cut-n-paste them, but they’re on my home iMac, and I’m at the office.

But yeah, speaking from general experience and a lot of anecdotes, Macs are overall less expensive than PCs for the _total_ life of the computer. The initial up-front cost is a bit higher, but you make up the difference in having fewer maintenance problems and a longer time before it becomes obsolete. The Mac I owned prior to my current iMac was a Quadra 660AV, which I ran for _eight_ years before it was no longer able to keep up with the latest computer trends and MacOS versions.

I actually collect anecdotes from other Mac users about their machines; feel free to visit [http://www.digiserve.com/eescape/mac/Mac.html](http://www.digiserve.com/eescape/mac/Mac.html) and browse 'em – there are a fair number of “Why I like my Mac much more than my PC” stories in there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 8:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/58 "2001-11-02T20:51:19Z")

</div>

I would just like to ask **Chas.E** why a Gartner report detailing the TCO for Mac vs PC in the corporate environment has any relevance to the home user. The home user is not rolling out 5000 units, paying for tech support, training, managing upgrades, networking, file sharing, etc. The home user is a completely different animal than the corporate user.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Venoma](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/c4cdca/32.png) [@Venoma](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Venoma)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 8:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/59 "2001-11-02T20:53:34Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by E-Sabbath \*  
> \*\*  
> Tires… honestly, spending extra money on high-brand tires doesn’t seem to do much for me. Except for rain tires. On the other hand, if you’re talking about scrimping on retreads… bad idea, yes.  
> \*\*

[hijack]  
Does it not snow where you live?

If so… I hate you. _Dreading imminent need for new snow tires_  
[/hijack]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cat\_Whisperer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cat_whisperer/32/4839_2.png) [@Cat\_Whisperer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cat_Whisperer)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2001, 8:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085/60 "2001-11-02T20:53:36Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by jarbabyj \*  
> \*\*
> 
> > [@](#):
> >
> > \*Originally posted by featherlou \*  
> > We have a PC and a Mac in our house
> 
> My god. You should go over to Israel and straighten out their conflicts. If Macs and PCs can get along, why not israelis and palestinians?
> 
> 😃
> 
> jar \*\*

AHA! THAT’S what I should be doing for a career! Where’s my passport - I have peacemaking to do!

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-i-know-it-is-more-expensive-yes-i-know/91085.md?page=4)
