# YES WE CAN! (if you're straight)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [November 5, 2008, 8:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339 "2008-11-05T20:12:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TWDuke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e495f1/32.png) [@TWDuke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TWDuke)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 6:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/41 "2008-11-06T06:21:34Z")

</div>

> [@Sampiro](#):
>
> The weirdest thing to me is that in Arkansas, long the butt of jokes and regarded as a socially barbarically conservative backwater (like Alabama), only 5% more voters voted against gay marriage than in California, considered one of the most tolerant (and, by some, “enlightened”) states.

Arkansas banned gay couples from adopting, which is legal in California.

**jellyblue** , I agree with almost everything you wrote in principal (although I suspect you know it would never fly; separation of church and state is the last thing these people want), except that the church should set its own rules regarding divorce, offspring, etc.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KGS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/90ced4/32.png) [@KGS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KGS)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 8:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/42 "2008-11-06T08:46:11Z")

</div>

> [@wevets](#):
>
> …but I’m not getting any solace out of the spending.
> 
> Seriously, they call themselves _churches_ and instead of spending millions feeding the hungry or caring for the sick, they choose to spend it to make sure other people who love each other **can’t get married?**

Well, that’s the history of organized religion, ain’t it? That money you donate to your church every week is more likely to end up as an Uzi in the hands of an Afghani terrorist child, or the pockets of a major political party, or the blood spilled by some abortion doctor getting shot or a person who died of cancer because stem cell research has been halted. Organized Religion is inherently evil, and all who plead fealty to it’s auspices (esp. Catholicism and Mormonism) shall have to answer for their transgression in this current life very soon, and this isn’t God’s Vengeance but the Vengeance of SCIENCE and LOGIC and REASON, fundamental natural forces which have been bottled up for far too long and cannot be held back any longer. (And those Yes On 8 posters sure disappeared quick, didn’t they? Wish I’d paid more attention to which houses hosted them…)

In other words, I sure ain’t ordering a Pepsi at Taco Bell again, ever!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elfkin477](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/a9a28c/32.png) [@elfkin477](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elfkin477)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 12:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/43 "2008-11-06T12:21:12Z")

</div>

I don’t think I understand the Arkansas thing. I’ve read that it’s a ban on “unmarried couples” adopting. Is that just codeword for gay couples, or would folks like Brad and Angelina be out of luck, too? Either way, it’s going to keep a lot of kids out of good homes ☹

You know, this whole rash of bans on gay marriage/civil unions makes me feel even more depressed about this election. I’m fairly conservative except that I fully support civil unions and adoptions by gay couples. So until I read the headlines yesterday, I thought that maybe there could be **one** thing I support being forwarded by electing a slew of democrats. Apparently not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FriarTed](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/friarted/32/1052_2.png) [@FriarTed](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FriarTed)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 12:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/44 "2008-11-06T12:35:19Z")

</div>

> [@KGS](#):
>
> (And those Yes On 8 posters sure disappeared quick, didn’t they? Wish I’d paid more attention to which houses hosted them…)
> 
> In other words, I sure ain’t ordering a Pepsi at Taco Bell again, ever!

First, why? What would you do to the people who had those signs?

Second, what about Taco Bell???

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lucky\_13](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lucky_13/32/13209_2.png) [@Lucky\_13](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lucky_13)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 12:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/45 "2008-11-06T12:38:35Z")

</div>

The Prop. 8 people are claiming it protects marriages and families. I saw a photo in the paper of a married gay couple at a rally with their adopted son. What about their marriage? What about their family? Don’t they deserve protection as well?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XJETGIRLX](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/9fc29f/32.png) [@XJETGIRLX](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XJETGIRLX)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 12:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/46 "2008-11-06T12:46:41Z")

</div>

> [@IGJoe](#):
>
> I’ve heard several times today that Prop 8 not only bans marriage, but all marriage-like institutions… ie civil unions and domestic partnerships. I haven’t been able to find anything like that in the [text of the proposition](http://www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov/title-sum/prop8-title-sum.htm) though… is there anyone that knows for sure one way or the other?

Amendment 2 in Florida does, though. The text of the amendment read:

“This amendment protects marriage as the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband and wife and provides that no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid or recognized.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 12:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/47 "2008-11-06T12:57:20Z")

</div>

Remember: every time God opens one door He slams another one in your face.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wmfellows](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/c2a13f/32.png) [@wmfellows](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wmfellows)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 1:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/48 "2008-11-06T13:40:37Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> What would be the point ? This is all about stomping on same sex couples; the bigots would never tolerate separate but equal. If such a thing is even doable, which I find highly unlikely; history shows what separate but equal is really like. Civil Unions are about creating an inferior pseudo version of marriage that can be used to lock people in as second class citizens.

That seems like rather the over-reaction.

If a legal category, perfectly open to both same sex and opposite sex couples were created, with the same rights and responsibilities as traditional marriage, but rebranded as it were, there is nothing inferior. Leaving marriage as a term to those with religious sensibilities seems a reasonable compromise.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 1:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/49 "2008-11-06T13:52:37Z")

</div>

> [@wmfellows](#):
>
> That seems like rather the over-reaction.
> 
> If a legal category, perfectly open to both same sex and opposite sex couples were created, with the same rights and responsibilities as traditional marriage, but rebranded as it were, there is nothing inferior. Leaving marriage as a term to those with religious sensibilities seems a reasonable compromise.

I’m not religious at all. Screw these compromise ideas. I wish to retain the word marriage. I got married, I did not get ‘unioned’. Keep fighting for full rights and take the compromise as only a brief step not a final step. I use to agree with **KGS** , but I don’t and it is for much the reasons that \*\*Der Trihs \*\*wrote.

These props were passed out of fear and in many cases hate. It is that simple.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 2:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/50 "2008-11-06T14:10:27Z")

</div>

> [@wmfellows](#):
>
> That seems like rather the over-reaction.
> 
> If a legal category, perfectly open to both same sex and opposite sex couples were created, with the same rights and responsibilities as traditional marriage, but rebranded as it were, there is nothing inferior.

That would never, ever be allowed to happen. We’ve **done this before**. Separate but equal is never equal; the one, the only point of trying to demand that homosexuals be relegated to “civil unions” is so they can be given a bad imitation of marriage. A ghetto marriage, one with fewer rights, benefits and respect.

We are speaking of people who don’t even want to allow homosexuals the WORD marriage, something they allow serial killers. But not those evil, evil gays. Why should I or anyone for one moment think they would be interested in anything even slightly resembling fairness ?

> [@wmfellows](#):
>
> Leaving marriage as a term to those with religious sensibilities seems a reasonable compromise.

Garbage. If we were talking about refusing to let non-whites get married, and instead they have to settle for a supposedly-equal separate institution would that be a reasonable compromise with people who have racial sensitivities ? And would you expect the separate institution to **really** be even remotely equal ?

This is bigotry, and deserves no compromise or respect or anything better than utter contempt, whatsoever.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XJETGIRLX](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/9fc29f/32.png) [@XJETGIRLX](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XJETGIRLX)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 2:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/51 "2008-11-06T14:12:43Z")

</div>

> [@wmfellows](#):
>
> That seems like rather the over-reaction.
> 
> If a legal category, perfectly open to both same sex and opposite sex couples were created, with the same rights and responsibilities as traditional marriage, but rebranded as it were, there is nothing inferior. Leaving marriage as a term to those with religious sensibilities seems a reasonable compromise.

By creating a separate category you not only reinforce the idea that it’s ‘not quite a marriage’ or ‘less than’ marriage, you also create the possibility of unequal changes to that status.

If gay people are allowed full-fledged marriage, the same as the rest of us, then what happens to their marriages happens to our marriages as well. If you carve out a separate legal category for them, then there’s the possibility of tinkering with their legal rights while leaving yours and mine alone. I don’t think that’s equal or fair.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KGS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/90ced4/32.png) [@KGS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KGS)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 4:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/52 "2008-11-06T16:24:06Z")

</div>

> [@Lucky\_13](#):
>
> The Prop. 8 people are claiming it protects marriages and families.

Yep, it’s always about Family Values. (These pro-8 people were too chickenshit to admit they’re anti-Gay, that’s why they claimed to be pro-Family instead.) Frankly, I think some work needs to be done to break the Family Values Cabal and make people realize that most families (esp. the so-called Nuclear Family) are fundamentally flawed by design. Sadly, the “Family Values” myth is so deeply ingrained in American society, the chances of breaking that myth are approx. 0.02%. ☹

> [@FriarTed](#):
>
> First, why? What would you do to the people who had those signs?

I would let them know my displeasure, without breaking any anti-stalker laws. (There weren’t any Pro-8 signs in my immediate neighborhood – the people 'round here know better – but in the conservative suburbs, esp. Ventura & Orange Counties, there were several.)

BTW, **KGSDad** thinks that Prop. 8 passed because “illegally registered” Hispanics voted for it – they’re all members of the Catholic church, and most of them are culturally biased against gays ( **KGSDad** actually said, “Hispanics aren’t gay,” to which I replied, “You’d be surprised!” – but it’s true, I haven’t met any _openly_ gay Hispanics…) L.A. County, for example, voted pro-8 despite being the Second Gayest County in CA after San Francisco – [here’s a cite.](http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_10909847?source=most_viewed)

> [@](#):
>
> Second, what about Taco Bell???

Unless I’m mistaken, PepsiCo is owned by Mormon interests, right? (Taco Hell just happens to be one franchise who’s signed with Pepsi instead of Coke…)

Sorry if my outraged tone upset anyone yesterday…however, I’m still Focusing My Will very strongly on northern Utah, so if a 6.5 earthquake strikes that area next week, you’ll know who did it. 🆒

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 4:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/53 "2008-11-06T16:27:14Z")

</div>

> [@KGS](#):
>
> Unless I’m mistaken, PepsiCo is owned by Mormon interests, right? (Taco Hell just happens to be one franchise who’s signed with Pepsi instead of Coke…)
> 
> Sorry if my outraged tone upset anyone yesterday…however, I’m still Focusing My Will very strongly on northern Utah, so if a 6.5 earthquake strikes that area next week, you’ll know who did it. 🆒

PepsiCo is publicly traded. I can’t imagine that their corporate governance is any different than other public companies.

Taco Bell used to be part of PepsiCo, along with KFC and Pizza Hut. It was spun off into a wholly separate entity (TriCon Restaurants) in the late nineties.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KGS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/90ced4/32.png) [@KGS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KGS)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 4:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/54 "2008-11-06T16:51:28Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> PepsiCo is publicly traded. I can’t imagine that their corporate governance is any different than other public companies.

Aw man, please don’t tell me that the Pepsi/Mormon connection is yet another urban legend… :smack:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 4:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/55 "2008-11-06T16:56:12Z")

</div>

> [@KGS](#):
>
> BTW, **KGSDad** thinks that Prop. 8 passed because “illegally registered” Hispanics voted for it – they’re all members of the Catholic church, and most of them are culturally biased against gays ( **KGSDad** actually said, “Hispanics aren’t gay,” to which I replied, “You’d be surprised!” – but it’s true, I haven’t met any _openly_ gay Hispanics…) L.A. County, for example, voted pro-8 despite being the Second Gayest County in CA after San Francisco – [here’s a cite.](http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_10909847?source=most_viewed)

Half the gay people I know (a couple dozen) are Hispanic. Maybe Florida gays are more comfortable or something.

> [@KGS](#):
>
> Aw man, please don’t tell me that the Pepsi/Mormon connection is yet another urban legend… :smack:

[Yup.](http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/mormon.asp) Unless Warren Buffet is a Mormon now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![levdrakon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/49beb7/32.png) [@levdrakon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/levdrakon)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 5:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/56 "2008-11-06T17:29:14Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> [Yup.](http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/mormon.asp) Unless Warren Buffet is a Mormon now.

Mormons may not own Coca-cola or Pepsi-Co, but corporations can and do support certain causes. Gays boycotted Coors beer for years because of their corporate support of anti-gay causes. I don’t know what the status is these days. I don’t drink beer much and never choose Coors when I do. [This site](http://www.bamn.com/boycott-coors/coors-myths-facts.asp) seems to feel Coors is still up to no good.

I’d like to know if PepsiCo or Coca-cola also sponsor or donate to causes anathema to me. It’s entirely possible.

One of my best friends made me boycott Domino’s Pizza for years, because they were anti-abortion/pro-life.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9fc348/32.png) [@The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Flying_Dutchman)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 5:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/57 "2008-11-06T17:43:51Z")

</div>

> [@XJETGIRLX](#):
>
> By creating a separate category you not only reinforce the idea that it’s ‘not quite a marriage’ or ‘less than’ marriage, you also create the possibility of unequal changes to that status.

That is a very good point.

Which is why I suggest that the word “marriage” be struck from all civil legislation and replaced by “civil union”. After all, marriage was a religious institution before any government saw fit to regulate it, thereby infringing on the separation of church and state.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Arnold\_Winkelried](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Arnold\_Winkelried](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Arnold_Winkelried)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 5:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/58 "2008-11-06T17:50:36Z")

</div>

> [@What\_Exit](#):
>
> As long as you understand that if Obama did openly support Gay Marriage during the campaign, he would not now be President Elect. It would have been incalculably stupid for him to do so and the states that put gay marriage on the ballots in 2004 did a lot to sabotage Kerry’s campaign.

We’ll never know what would have happened if Obama made a statement saying gay marriage should be legal, but the candidates all moving toward a middle position in the elections is on of the things that makes people say that there is no real difference between the Democrats and the Republicans.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 5:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/59 "2008-11-06T17:53:13Z")

</div>

> [@levdrakon](#):
>
> I’d like to know if PepsiCo or Coca-cola also sponsor or donate to causes anathema to me. It’s entirely possible.
> 
> One of my best friends made me boycott Domino’s Pizza for years, because they were anti-abortion/pro-life.

Well, sure, but _do_ they?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brown\_Eyed\_Girl](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/brown_eyed_girl/32/3574_2.png) [@Brown\_Eyed\_Girl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Brown_Eyed_Girl)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2008, 5:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339/60 "2008-11-06T17:56:11Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Flying\_Dutchman](#):
>
> That is a very good point.
> 
> Which is why I suggest that the word “marriage” be struck from all civil legislation and replaced by “civil union”. After all, marriage was a religious institution before any government saw fit to regulate it, thereby infringing on the separation of church and state.

As a non-religious married citizen, I support this. I really couldn’t care less what you call it as long as every adult can do it with whom they prefer.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/yes-we-can-if-youre-straight/471339.md?page=4)
