# You have got another "thing" or "think" coming?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [November 14, 2012, 12:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931 "2012-11-14T00:26:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2012, 3:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/141 "2012-11-15T15:41:17Z")

</div>

> [@Mangetout](#):
>
> Many a mickle maks a muckle.

Let me try that out a few times…

…

Nope. Still fun to say.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johanna](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johanna/32/8318_2.png) [@Johanna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johanna)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2012, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/142 "2012-11-15T15:44:47Z")

</div>

_Think_  
dammit

> [@AnaMen](#):
>
> Like Gracer, I always assumed people who said “thing” were illiterate, and was surprised at the extent of this misconception. When you learn language primarily in spoken form, these types of errors can occur, while the original remains correctly written in books.

Good analysis. I think you’ve nailed it.

> [@](#):
>
> The phrase is meant to be somewhat humorous, and with “thing,” the joke’s on you.

A joke falling flat with a sort of sad sorry plop that doesn’t even amount to a good pratfall.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gracer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/8e7dd6/32.png) [@gracer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gracer)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2012, 3:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/143 "2012-11-15T15:55:44Z")

</div>

> [@AnaMen](#):
>
> Like Gracer, I always assumed people who said “thing” were illiterate, and was surprised at the extent of this misconception. When you learn language primarily in spoken form, these types of errors can occur, while the original remains correctly written in books. […]

Then along came the internet to completely mess up the stats with every buffoon and his dog posting “thing” “thing” “thing” “duck” “thing” “duck”…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2012, 4:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/144 "2012-11-15T16:13:44Z")

</div>

> [@furdmort](#):
>
> Nah. It’s the Beavis and Butthead generation that did it. It’s the same bunch of clowns who think calling someone a nimrod is calling them an idiot or a fool.

1. Nimrod for idiot is not the Beavis and Butthead generation but [the Bugs Bunny one](http://www.omg-facts.com/Celebs/Nimrod-became-a-synonym-for-idiot-thank/50925?c_val=1).

2. “Thing” is the usual way I’ve always heard it, and always “you got another …” and never “you’ve got …” When I heard “think coming” I always thought someone was trying to be cutsie in some way. And coming off dumb.

3. Both apparently go way back and neither seems to really have a clear claim as “the right way” either by virtue of original phrase or by being overwhelmingly used.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colophon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f05b48/32.png) [@Colophon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colophon)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2012, 4:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/145 "2012-11-15T16:18:58Z")

</div>

Or did you hear about the guy who was remodelling his bathroom and didn’t realise his wife had changed the plans to include his ‘n’ hers vanities? He thought he was all finished, but he had another sink coming…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/94ad74/32.png) [@tdn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tdn)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2012, 4:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/146 "2012-11-15T16:24:29Z")

</div>

> [@Colophon](#):
>
> Or did you hear about the guy who was remodelling his bathroom and didn’t realise his wife had changed the plans to include his ‘n’ hers vanities? He thought he was all finished, but he had another sink coming…

No, no, no. His wife’s fickleness caused him to have another affair, so he had another fling coming.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![James52637](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/439d5e/32.png) [@James52637](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/James52637)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2012, 7:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/147 "2012-11-15T19:03:44Z")

</div>

You have another think coming? NO! Maybe “You have another thought” coming, but a think? I can’t give you a think.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2012, 7:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/148 "2012-11-15T19:05:09Z")

</div>

And of course there was the fur breeder who staged mass breedings who had another mink coming.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pulykamell](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pulykamell/32/3166_2.png) [@pulykamell](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pulykamell)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2012, 7:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/149 "2012-11-15T19:23:23Z")

</div>

Or the tenor who was called back for an encore and had another sing coming?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colophon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f05b48/32.png) [@Colophon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colophon)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2012, 7:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/150 "2012-11-15T19:23:58Z")

</div>

> [@James52637](#):
>
> You have another think coming? NO! Maybe “You have another thought” coming, but a think? I can’t give you a think.

Want to have a think about that one?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2012, 5:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/151 "2012-11-16T05:40:37Z")

</div>

Think I had too many beans tonight? You’ve got another stink coming.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kittenblue](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ba8739/32.png) [@kittenblue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kittenblue)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2012, 1:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/152 "2012-11-16T13:58:10Z")

</div>

> [@Inner\_Stickler](#):
>
> Even if we assume that think is more elegant, it’s like putting lipstick on a pig and saying the lipsticked pig is more elegant. Sure, but it’s still a pig. Neither phrase is all that graceful. Anyway, you know who calls thoughts thinks? 3 year-olds and Dr. Suess. Are you a three year-old or Dr. Suess? Then say thing.

Maybe you should sit over there in the corner and have a good, long think about what you just said.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kittenblue](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ba8739/32.png) [@kittenblue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kittenblue)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2012, 3:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/153 "2012-11-16T15:17:42Z")

</div>

NM

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![svd678](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/53a042/32.png) [@svd678](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/svd678)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2012, 7:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/154 "2012-11-16T19:54:33Z")

</div>

The expression is about an erroneous way of thinking, so you need to think again. The first person in history who said “thing” misunderstood what he/she thought they heard.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2012, 7:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/155 "2012-11-16T19:56:44Z")

</div>

when you have an erroneous way of thinking, you have another thing coming.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2012, 7:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/156 "2012-11-16T19:58:28Z")

</div>

> [@tdn](#):
>
> Are you kidding? “Think coming” has a necessary glotal stop. You can practically hear the needle scratching across the record in the space between those words.

If you say it with a glottal stop, I’d say you’re saying it wrong\*. All that happens is what happens with any other adjacent consonants from different words: the consonant is elongated. Since it’s a stop, and a stop only makes sound when it’s released, you do notice a pause, but it is produced by the back of the tongue against the hard palate, not by the space surrounding the vocal chords and larynx. It’s velar, not glottal.

\*If you guys can say I’m using the wrong word, I can say you’re using the wrong pronunciation 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/94ad74/32.png) [@tdn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tdn)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2012, 8:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/157 "2012-11-16T20:16:26Z")

</div>

Yeah, well, I couldn’t thing of a better word. But I believe I have another drink coming.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johanna](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johanna/32/8318_2.png) [@Johanna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johanna)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2012, 8:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/158 "2012-11-16T20:18:29Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> the consonant is elongated. Since it’s a stop, and a stop only makes sound when it’s released, you do notice a pause, but it is produced by the back of the tongue against the hard palate, not by the space surrounding the vocal chords and larynx. It’s velar, not glottal.

Exactly correct. It’s an elongated [kː], the same as in Di **ck C** lark [dɪkːlɑrk].

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Blaster\_Master](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/cab0a1/32.png) [@Blaster\_Master](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Blaster_Master)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2012, 8:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/159 "2012-11-16T20:55:44Z")

</div>

Personally, I don’t particularly care, but it seems to me like there’s a lot of assertions going on about the strength of the think case that just isn’t there. For one, there’s an earlier cite by it, for around the same time, you’re talking 1898 and 1906, from what I recall seeing, which are contemporary cites from over a hundred years ago. It seems to me that the idiom likely rose around that time, but probably was spoken first, so that it was written one way or the other first doesn’t really seem all that convincing. It also seems to me that, regardless of how it may have started, when spoken, they sound almost exactly the same. If I were to say “think coming” I’d not have the glottal stop, I’d slur it together to sound like “thin coming” or “think umming”. If I say “thing coming” I’d even mostly downplay the “ing” sound. So it makes sense that it would arise and confused contemporously.

I also think the idea that “thing” doesn’t make sense, is a non-start. I’ve always understood the phrase to mean, you might expect one thing, but something different is going to happen. Even given that think can be used as a noun, whatever it is, it’s a thing, if it’s not a thing, it’s nothing. It may or may not fit with the flow as much in your estimation, but it definitely makes sense.

Finally, this whole idea that it’s some kind of really clever joke, personally, strikes me as a post hoc explanation, in the way that a lot of people think fuck or a number of other words originated as acronyms. Think just sounds a little archaic and I think that if think is the original, it’s just because that’s more or less how people spoke, it quickly got confused for thing, and then nit-pickers today sort of discovered the hidden joke that may never have been intended at all. It’s not like it’s come from an authoritative source like Shakespeare where we can make pretty good judgments about the subtle humor he may have intended.

And like the aforementioned “head over heals in love” or “could care less”, why would people snicker or think someone is ignorant? I KNOW “head over heals in love” is wrong and sounds dumb, but it incapsulates and idea that isn’t so easily expressed in nearly as few words. I do tend to refuse to use “could care less” and will say “couldn’t care less”, since it is actually correct and expresses the idea as concisely, unless I am making a joke like “I could care less… but not by much”.

So, in general, it just seems like there’s a lot of certainty about a pretty odd thing we really have no reason to have so much certainty about, can’t really be settled, and only matters if it’s written anyway, which it rarely is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johanna](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johanna/32/8318_2.png) [@Johanna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johanna)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2012, 4:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931/160 "2012-11-17T04:29:19Z")

</div>

There is no glottal stop in it. It’s a velar stop: [[k](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voiceless_velar_stop)[ː](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemination#English)].  
[θɪŋkːʌmɪŋ]

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931.md?page=7)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-have-got-another-thing-or-think-coming/640931.md?page=9)
