# You know their name, but don't realize it.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [January 30, 2020, 12:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202 "2020-01-30T00:14:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 17\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2020, 6:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/41 "2020-02-04T18:01:21Z")

</div>

There’s the character of “Annyong” Bluth from _Arrested Development_.

He was a Korean teenager adopted by Lucille Bluth. Not speaking English, he would greet people by saying “annyong” which is the Korean word for “hello”. And the Bluths assumed his name was Annyong and called him this.

Two seasons later his actual name was revealed; Hel-loh, which is the Korean word for “one day”. Hel-loh’s family had been ruined by the Bluths and he had vowed to destroy them one day.

And this had been revealed in the first season when the banana shack had been vandalized by a then unknown person who had spray pained “I’LL GET U BLUTH HELLO” on it. Neither the Bluths or the viewers realized at the time that the vandal had signed his work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SirRay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/cc9497/32.png) [@SirRay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SirRay)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2020, 6:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/42 "2020-02-04T18:26:32Z")

</div>

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> There’s that classic murder mystery, _[Deduce You Say](https://cartoontheater.com/cartoons/deduce-you-say/)_, where [del]Holmes and Watson[/del] Homes and Watkins are pursuing the Shropshire Slasher.
> 
> “Your name?”  
> “Shropshire Slasher.”  
> “Occupation?”  
> “Shropshire Slasher.”

Well, if we are including dialog like that, then from the Harvey Birdman episode “Bannon Custody Battle”

“State your first name, your last name, and your occupation.”  
“Lizardman, Lizardman, and, uh, Lizardman”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sparky812](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/eb9ed0/32.png) [@Sparky812](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sparky812)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2020, 7:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/43 "2020-02-04T19:03:18Z")

</div>

> [@Telemark](#):
>
> From the opening of The Prisoner. Many folks have interpreted that last line as “You are, Number Six” with the meaning that Number Six is now Number One.

… except it’s recited as “YOU … are Number Six!”

How about “Zardoz” from the film of the same name?

Or “V’Ger” from Star Trek -The Motion Picture?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thelurkinghorror](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/7c8e57/32.png) [@thelurkinghorror](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/thelurkinghorror)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2020, 7:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/44 "2020-02-04T19:25:53Z")

</div>

> [@Tired\_and\_Cranky](#):
>
> Homer J. Simpson knew his middle initial but neither he nor the audience knew what it stood for until one episode revealed that he was, in fact, Homer Jay Simpson!

Boy band producer L.T. Smash is in fact the US Navy’s Lt. Smash. Lt. L.T. Smash that is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Doug\_K](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b5ac83/32.png) [@Doug\_K](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Doug_K)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2020, 12:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/45 "2020-02-12T00:59:33Z")

</div>

> [@Peter\_Morris](#):
>
> In the film Withnail & I, Paul McGann’s character is never addressed by name. He’s listed as “& I” in the credits. However, his name is known because at one point he receives a telegram, addressed to “Marwood”.
> 
> As for [The Man With No Name…](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obLl9d3ZUmA&t=5m30s)

As much as I like the films, the whole “Man with no name” bit bugs the heck out of me, because they’re three similarly themed films featuring three similar but distinct characters played by the same actor, and each character has a different name:  
Joe in Dollars  
Manco in More Dollars  
Blondie in Good etc.

They weren’t even intended to be a trilogy. Just three separate films. “The Man With No Name” thing was the marketing ploy of United Artists, who had nothing to do with the production, they were just the American distributor.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolfman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/a8b319/32.png) [@wolfman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolfman)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2020, 1:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/46 "2020-02-12T01:48:05Z")

</div>

> [@Doug\_K](#):
>
> As much as I like the films, the whole “Man with no name” bit bugs the heck out of me, because they’re three similarly themed films featuring three similar but distinct characters played by the same actor, and each character has a different name:  
> Joe in Dollars  
> Manco in More Dollars  
> Blondie in Good etc.
> 
> They weren’t even intended to be a trilogy. Just three separate films. “The Man With No Name” thing was the marketing ploy of United Artists, who had nothing to do with the production, they were just the American distributor.

It’s pretty clear none of those are his actual name, just something someone chooses to call him at the time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Doug\_K](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b5ac83/32.png) [@Doug\_K](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Doug_K)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2020, 2:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/47 "2020-02-12T14:44:00Z")

</div>

> [@wolfman](#):
>
> It’s pretty clear none of those are his actual name, just something someone chooses to call him at the time.

No, it’s pretty clear that those are the actual names of the three different characters. Those are the names as given in the credits. The fact that “The Man With No Name” concept was a later fabrication of United Artists is well documented. The characters seem similar for the same reasons most of John Wayne’s characters seem similar - they were played by the same actor and were in the same genre.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2020, 8:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/48 "2020-04-28T20:04:44Z")

</div>

> [@Telemark](#):
>
> From the opening of The Prisoner. Many folks have interpreted that last line as “You are, Number Six” with the meaning that Number Six is now Number One.

Since spoilers are inevitable: a villain on THE FLASH keeps getting asked, by the title character, who he is. He keeps saying: _“I’m the future Flash”_ — which keeps getting interpreted as _“I’m the future, Flash”_, but, no, he’s just an honest time traveller.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grestarian](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/grestarian/32/3227_2.png) [@Grestarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grestarian)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2020, 6:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/49 "2020-04-29T06:45:29Z")

</div>

> [@Doug\_K](#):
>
> As much as I like the films, the whole “Man with no name” bit bugs the heck out of me, because they’re three similarly themed films featuring three similar but distinct characters played by the same actor, and each character has a different name:  
> Joe in Dollars  
> Manco in More Dollars  
> Blondie in Good etc.
> 
> They weren’t even intended to be a trilogy. Just three separate films. “The Man With No Name” thing was the marketing ploy of United Artists, who had nothing to do with the production, they were just the American distributor.

Yeah, but I also think Eastwood played that up when he did High Plains Drifter with his own company, Malpaso, and I can see how he could legitimately claim the one character was only called that by other people who didn’t have his real name to use; he never actually says, “My name is…” or anything similar. [This, I think, is where he started turning the ‘nameless’ character into something of a divine avatar or daemon](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9splceYBXQ) – particularly with 1:25 through 1:45 – and I think it worked out well. The then took the character to Carbon County (He must have crawled, 'cause it took him years to get there!) where he was simply referred to as Preacher in Pale Rider.  
–G!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SurrenderDorothy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/surrenderdorothy/32/1221_2.png) [@SurrenderDorothy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SurrenderDorothy)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2020, 7:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/50 "2020-04-29T07:01:16Z")

</div>

Frozone’s wife in The Incredibles is, apparently, actually named Honey.

As in, “Honey, WHERE’S my super suit?”  
“What?”  
“WHERE IS MY SUPER SUIT?”  
…  
“We are talking about the greater good!”  
“Greater good?! I am your wife! I am the greatest good you are EVER gonna get!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![solost](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/solost/32/11776_2.png) [@solost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/solost)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2020, 12:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/51 "2020-04-29T12:39:07Z")

</div>

> [@DummyGladHands](#):
>
> Goes to show you, never evah marry a Cartwright!

I recently watched an episode where they killed off a young Bonnie Bedelia after she made the mistake of marrying Little Joe. So the Ben Cartwright wife curse did pass on to the kids. Don’t think the other Cartwright kids married, they probably knew better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2020, 7:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/52 "2020-04-29T19:40:28Z")

</div>

I wonder if Ben Cartwright ever stole beans from a witch’s garden?

Oh, and Dr. Mrs. the Monarch’s first name is Sheila.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2020, 8:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/53 "2020-04-29T20:08:00Z")

</div>

> [@Doug\_K](#):
>
> No, it’s pretty clear that those are the actual names of the three different characters.

Its very clear that they are the same character, since they wear an identical poncho and hat, not to mention smoking the same kind of cigar.

[A Fistful of Dollars.](https://thepinksmoke.com/images/fistfulsmoking.jpg)

[For a Few Dollars More.](https://twscritic.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/for-a-few-dollars-more1.jpg)

[The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.](https://static.rogerebert.com/uploads/review/primary_image/reviews/great-movie-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-1968/EB20030803REVIEWS08308030301AR.jpg)

In fact, although the last of the three films, _The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly_ is chronologically the first. When he first appears, [Blondie is wearing a gray duster coat.](https://www.themoviescene.co.uk/reviews/_img/733-2.jpg) He acquires the iconic poncho later in the movie. He’s very obviously intended to be the same character that appears in the earlier (although chronologically later) movies.

> [@](#):
>
> Those are the names as given in the credits.

Not really relevant. Those are aliases. Eastwood’s character may be referred to by those names, but he never introduces himself as such, and never gives his own name.

> [@](#):
>
> The characters seem similar for the same reasons most of John Wayne’s characters seem similar - they were played by the same actor and were in the same genre.

In which movies did Wayne’s character wear an identical outfit?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_Morris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peter_morris/32/359_2.png) [@Peter\_Morris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_Morris)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2020, 8:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/54 "2020-04-29T20:52:13Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> Its very clear that they are the same character, since they wear an identical poncho and hat, not to mention smoking the same kind of cigar.

Rufus T. Firefly, Otis B. Driftwood and Captain Spaulding wear identical clothes and smoke the same kind of cigar. Are they the same character?

What about Chaplin’s Tramp who adopted Jackie Coogan in The Kid, is he the same character as the Tramp that married the blind flower seller in City Lights? Identical clothes, hat and walking stick.

Surely you are familiar with the concept of a stock character? Where every story is separate, with no continuity between them, A character can get married in one story, and have no wife in the next, and there is no contradiction. They are essentially different characters who look the same.

The three characters played by Eastwood have a lot of similarities, but also some differences in motivation and character. In Fistful, he’s a drifter who just wanders into a town full of troubles. In More he’s an honest bounty hunter who sets out with the intention of finding criminals for the reward. In Ugly, he’s a crook who turns in then rescues Tuco multiple times for the reward.

I see them as three different characters.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2020, 10:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/55 "2020-04-29T22:16:22Z")

</div>

> [@Peter\_Morris](#):
>
> Rufus T. Firefly, Otis B. Driftwood and Captain Spaulding wear identical clothes and smoke the same kind of cigar. Are they the same character?
> 
> What about Chaplin’s Tramp who adopted Jackie Coogan in The Kid, is he the same character as the Tramp that married the blind flower seller in City Lights? Identical clothes, hat and walking stick.
> 
> Surely you are familiar with the concept of a stock character? Where every story is separate, with no continuity between them, A character can get married in one story, and have no wife in the next, and there is no contradiction. They are essentially different characters who look the same.

Exactly. Those are comedies using stock characters developed by those comedians. The Marx Brothers are their stock characters regardless of what names they have. Same with Chaplin’s Little Tramp. But that’s not what the character in the Dollars trilogy is.

> [@](#):
>
> The three characters played by Eastwood have a lot of similarities, but also some differences in motivation and character. In Fistful, he’s a drifter who just wanders into a town full of troubles. In More he’s an honest bounty hunter who sets out with the intention of finding criminals for the reward. In Ugly, he’s a crook who turns in then rescues Tuco multiple times for the reward.
> 
> I see them as three different characters.

Nah, they’re all really just opportunists. Blondie is a bounty hunter as well. And the name of the second movie doesn’t make sense except as a reference to the first one. Why “For a Few Dollars More,” if it’s not in reference to a few dollars more than the fistful the character made in the first movie? And as I said, Blondie is shown acquiring the identical poncho in TGTBATU. It couldn’t be more obvious that Leone meant him to be the same character.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Doug\_K](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b5ac83/32.png) [@Doug\_K](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Doug_K)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2020, 6:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/56 "2020-04-30T18:12:26Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> Its very clear that they are the same character, since they wear an identical poncho and hat, not to mention smoking the same kind of cigar.
> 
> [A Fistful of Dollars.](https://thepinksmoke.com/images/fistfulsmoking.jpg)
> 
> [For a Few Dollars More.](https://twscritic.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/for-a-few-dollars-more1.jpg)
> 
> [The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.](https://static.rogerebert.com/uploads/review/primary_image/reviews/great-movie-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-1968/EB20030803REVIEWS08308030301AR.jpg)
> 
> In fact, although the last of the three films, _The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly_ is chronologically the first. When he first appears, [Blondie is wearing a gray duster coat.](https://www.themoviescene.co.uk/reviews/_img/733-2.jpg) He acquires the iconic poncho later in the movie. He’s very obviously intended to be the same character that appears in the earlier (although chronologically later) movies.

[No, that was never intended.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollars_Trilogy)

> [@](#):
>
> **Although not Leone’s intention** , the three films came to be considered a trilogy following the exploits of the same so-called “Man with No Name” (portrayed by Clint Eastwood, wearing the same clothes and acting with the same mannerisms). **The “Man with No Name” concept was invented by the American distributor United Artists, looking for a strong angle to sell the films as a trilogy.** Eastwood’s character does indeed have a name (albeit a nickname) and a different one in each film: “Joe”, “Manco” and “Blondie”, respectively.

(My bolding)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/earl_snake-hips_tucker/32/3269_2.png) [@Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Earl_Snake-Hips_Tucker)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2020, 8:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202/57 "2020-04-30T20:02:51Z")

</div>

Frances Lawrence: Gidget  
Clyde Wynant: The Thin Man  
Dolores Mann: Lolita

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-know-their-name-but-dont-realize-it/847202.md?page=2)
