# You need time off for surgery?  You're fired!

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [April 11, 2009, 4:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749 "2009-04-11T16:29:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brazil84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8491ac/32.png) [@brazil84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brazil84)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2009, 11:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/161 "2009-04-16T11:13:48Z")

</div>

> [@Broomstick](#):
>
> I have seen managers scheme ways to fire people for people younger than them, prettier than them, for having a different religion (yes, I know that’s illegal. So do they, but they’re doing “The Lord’s Work”), different skin color (yes, I know that’s illegal, too), having hobbies they don’t approve of, political views they don’t agree with (yes, also illegal), a different taste in clothing, for buying a car better than the manager’s, for smoking, for having pets, for not donating to the manager’s favorite charities, and yes, for having the audacity to get sick or injured. Little or none of it makes sense, but managers are human beings and some of them make decisions based more on emotion and prejudice than reason.

I agree with you on this point. Also, some managers see a leave request as an indication of disloyalty.

But the thing is this: If we are accept that the manager is a human being, we should also accept that the ex-employee is a human being. Which means there is a pretty good chance\* that she is spinning, exaggerating, or even lying to put herself in a better light and to put Zale’s in a worse light.

\*When I say “pretty good chance,” I mean it in the normal, English sense of the phrase. As opposed to the **Fear Itself / Guinistasia** definition.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2009, 7:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/162 "2009-04-16T19:10:48Z")

</div>

> [@brazil84](#):
>
> \*When I say “pretty good chance,” I mean it in the normal, English sense of the phrase. As opposed to the **Fear Itself / Guinistasia** definition.

Which would be…???

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Algorithm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/algorithm/32/12204_2.png) [@Algorithm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Algorithm)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2009, 7:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/163 "2009-04-16T19:35:49Z")

</div>

I believe [post #31](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=11029112&postcount=31) (and the ensuing discussion on page 1) is the reason for **brazil84** ’s disclaimer. A few posters interpreted the phrase “pretty good chance of X” to mean “X is necessarily true”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brazil84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8491ac/32.png) [@brazil84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brazil84)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2009, 7:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/164 "2009-04-16T19:51:36Z")

</div>

> [@Algorithm](#):
>
> I believe [post #31](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=11029112&postcount=31) (and the ensuing discussion on page 1) is the reason for **brazil84** ’s disclaimer. A few posters interpreted the phrase “pretty good chance of X” to mean “X is necessarily true”.

Thank you for that.

See also posts 38 and 41.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveG1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@SteveG1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SteveG1)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2009, 8:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/165 "2009-04-17T20:57:51Z")

</div>

> [@Frank](#):
>
> Given that she had $1,000,000 in sales in 2008 and was terminated one week after asking for time off for surgery, I know what my judgement is.

If I owned the company, I’d hire her back and fire the manager. Dollars and cents, common sense, profit and loss and all that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sauron](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce7236/32.png) [@Sauron](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sauron)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2009, 9:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/166 "2009-04-17T21:12:27Z")

</div>

> [@SteveG1](#):
>
> If I owned the company, I’d hire her back and fire the manager. Dollars and cents, common sense, profit and loss and all that.

Would you hire her back if she’d been stealing from the company?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brazil84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8491ac/32.png) [@brazil84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brazil84)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2009, 9:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/167 "2009-04-17T21:27:33Z")

</div>

> [@SteveG1](#):
>
> If I owned the company, I’d hire her back and fire the manager. Dollars and cents, common sense, profit and loss and all that.

It’s ironic that you should say that, because often it’s firing people without sufficient thought or consideration that causes these sorts of problems in the first place.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dante](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dante/32/9673_2.png) [@Dante](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dante)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2009, 2:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/168 "2009-04-19T02:08:12Z")

</div>

> [@Algorithm](#):
>
> I believe [post #31](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=11029112&postcount=31) (and the ensuing discussion on page 1) is the reason for **brazil84** ’s disclaimer. A few posters interpreted the phrase “pretty good chance of X” to mean “X is necessarily true”.

[Here](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=502519) you can see **brazil84** ’s sing the same tune to **you with the face**. Posts 31 & 33. Apparently, “Not necessarily” is equal to “No”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2009, 2:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/169 "2009-04-19T02:46:48Z")

</div>

> [@Dante](#):
>
> [Here](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=502519) you can see **brazil84** ’s sing the same tune to **you with the face**. Posts 31 & 33. Apparently, “Not necessarily” is equal to “No”.

And it goes downhill from there. (The death penalty is sexist, apparently.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveG1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@SteveG1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SteveG1)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2009, 3:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/170 "2009-04-20T15:22:40Z")

</div>

> [@Sauron](#):
>
> Would you hire her back if she’d been stealing from the company?

Oh, HELL no.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sauron](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce7236/32.png) [@Sauron](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sauron)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2009, 4:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/171 "2009-04-20T16:24:44Z")

</div>

> [@SteveG1](#):
>
> Oh, HELL no.

And that wasn’t a fair question, either. I’m speculating wildly, which I shouldn’t do.

I seriously doubt we ever hear the resolution to this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brazil84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8491ac/32.png) [@brazil84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brazil84)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2009, 4:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/172 "2009-04-20T16:51:28Z")

</div>

> [@Sauron](#):
>
> I seriously doubt we ever hear the resolution to this.

I agree. If her case has any merit, it will probably\* be quietly settled with a confidentiality agreement.

\*When I say “probably,” I mean the normal English meaning and not the **Fear Itself / Guinistasia** definition.

> [@Dante](#):
>
> . .

By the way, I don’t engage with or respond to this poster due to his or her past dishonesty. I am happy to provide a link as appropriate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dante](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dante/32/9673_2.png) [@Dante](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dante)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2009, 5:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/173 "2009-04-20T17:41:19Z")

</div>

> [@brazil84](#):
>
> By the way, I don’t engage with or respond to this poster due to his or her past dishonesty. I am happy to provide a link as appropriate.

Let me guess. I pulled and squeezed and hurt your neck? In 1988?

You’re a troll, you’re a coward, you’re a racist, and you’re intellectually dishonest. What you’re doing on this message board is beyond me.

Go hide your face in your serious injury book, and keep it hidden there while the grownups talk.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glilly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/48db29/32.png) [@glilly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/glilly)\
**Post date:** [April 21, 2009, 4:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/174 "2009-04-21T04:43:07Z")

</div>

> [@SteveG1](#):
>
> If I owned the company, I’d hire her back and fire the manager. Dollars and cents, common sense, profit and loss and all that.

This thread has put our saleswoman as either wronged star employee or possible felon. But people can be justifiably fired without committing criminal acts.

One problem sometimes faced by managers is the star performer who is a jerk. They may perform exceptionally at their assignments, but drive other workers away or gain sales at the expense of the other salespeople. Management professors (like Robert Sutton in “The No Asshole Rule”) argue these people cost the company more than they gain and should be purged.

If that were the case here (and I’m not arguing it is as I have no evidence that it is so), then our saleswoman’s facts (awards, etc.) could be all correct yet still fired for (good) cause. Even if she were given this cause on termination (and previous reviews), she may believe it was a cover for a dishonest termination.

But as said, we’ll probably never know. I don’t think I’ve EVER heard of a company publicly discuss a (non-executive) termination except as part of a lawsuit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![running\_coach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/running_coach/32/15836_2.png) [@running\_coach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/running_coach)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2009, 4:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/175 "2009-05-01T16:53:55Z")

</div>

[Update](http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090424/BIZ/904240370/-1/NEWS). Still not resolved.

Main points; Zales is claiming she was fired for misbehavior and written up for such but has not released documentation to her lawyer.

Zales also tried to deny her unemployment benefits but again failed to provide documentation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2009, 8:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/176 "2009-05-01T20:53:58Z")

</div>

> [@runner pat](#):
>
> [Update](http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090424/BIZ/904240370/-1/NEWS). Still not resolved.
> 
> Main points; Zales is claiming she was fired for misbehavior and written up for such but has not released documentation to her lawyer.
> 
> Zales also tried to deny her unemployment benefits but again failed to provide documentation.

I just read through the reader comments on this. Of 160 comments, only one person (plus one sock) supported Zales, with spurious arguments. She claimed to work in the same mall, and claims to know the fired lady and others who work there. Supposedly the firing was done for being overly aggressive and doing things like selling maintenance agreements without consent and claiming jewelry was gold plated when it wasn’t. However it seems hard for me to imagine that someone with $1M in sales can do it without return business.  
Also, copies of any formal writeups are given to the employee, at least in large companies. It is hard for me to believe she was on some sort of performance improvement plan and getting awards at the same time. It is also hard to believe that even if she was on a plan or was being warned, she’d be fired a week after asking for leave. That’s just evil.

The interesting stuff is on the last two pages of comments. The rest of the comments are calling for a boycott of Zales and possible demonstration against them Memorial Day.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveG1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@SteveG1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SteveG1)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2009, 9:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/177 "2009-05-01T21:09:07Z")

</div>

> [@Sauron](#):
>
> And that wasn’t a fair question, either. I’m speculating wildly, which I shouldn’t do.
> 
> I seriously doubt we ever hear the resolution to this.

I imagine it will grind on in some court room, and we will have long since moved on to some other subject.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveG1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@SteveG1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SteveG1)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2009, 9:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/178 "2009-05-01T21:16:14Z")

</div>

> [@glilly](#):
>
> This thread has put our saleswoman as either wronged star employee or possible felon. But people can be justifiably fired without committing criminal acts.
> 
> One problem sometimes faced by managers is the star performer who is a jerk. They may perform exceptionally at their assignments, but drive other workers away or gain sales at the expense of the other salespeople. Management professors (like Robert Sutton in “The No Asshole Rule”) argue these people cost the company more than they gain and should be purged.
> 
> If that were the case here (and I’m not arguing it is as I have no evidence that it is so), then our saleswoman’s facts (awards, etc.) could be all correct yet still fired for (good) cause. Even if she were given this cause on termination (and previous reviews), she may believe it was a cover for a dishonest termination.
> 
> But as said, we’ll probably never know. I don’t think I’ve EVER heard of a company publicly discuss a (non-executive) termination except as part of a lawsuit.

I like the No Asshole Rule. Some people are just. not. worth. it. I’ve had to work with a few (fortunately only a few), and when you really really look, they usually weren’t such stars after all. They had just managed to convince someone that they were. I had one of them try to steal MY work once, but I was already wise to the situation and set her up. I sent a “pre release” to my bosses, and left a really awful pile of garbage on my desk for her to steal (and she did). BUSTED 😃

And then there was the office bully who constantly disrupted work and made a habit of physically threatening people.

As for this lady, I don’t dare claim to know more than anyone else here. but on the face of it, I’d have been leery of firing her. I’d be very very sure I had all the CYA’s and “Pearl Harbor files” in place, just in case.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9fc348/32.png) [@The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Flying_Dutchman)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2009, 4:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/179 "2009-05-02T04:53:57Z")

</div>

> [@glilly](#):
>
> This thread has put our saleswoman as either wronged star employee or possible felon. But people can be justifiably fired without committing criminal acts.
> 
> One problem sometimes faced by managers is the star performer who is a jerk. They may perform exceptionally at their assignments, but drive other workers away or gain sales at the expense of the other salespeople. Management professors (like Robert Sutton in “The No Asshole Rule”) argue these people cost the company more than they gain and should be purged.
> 
> If that were the case here (and I’m not arguing it is as I have no evidence that it is so), then our saleswoman’s facts (awards, etc.) could be all correct yet still fired for (good) cause. Even if she were given this cause on termination (and previous reviews), she may believe it was a cover for a dishonest termination.
> 
> But as said, we’ll probably never know. I don’t think I’ve EVER heard of a company publicly discuss a (non-executive) termination except as part of a lawsuit.

Very well put.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brazil84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8491ac/32.png) [@brazil84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brazil84)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2009, 8:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749/180 "2009-05-02T08:27:34Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> Also, copies of any formal writeups are given to the employee, at least in large companies.

Sure at the time of the writeup. But down the road, after the employee’s job has ended, many employers will refuse to provide copies of this sort of stuff.

Which is probably a pretty good strategy on the company’s part.

> [@](#):
>
> It is hard for me to believe she was on some sort of performance improvement plan and getting awards at the same time.

I’ve seen it happen many times that an employee was discharged for legitimate reasons despite being a star performer or an employee of the month or something.

> [@](#):
>
> It is also hard to believe that even if she was on a plan or was being warned, she’d be fired a week after asking for leave.

I’ve seen stuff like this happen many times too. Sometimes the official reason for discharge is a pretext. More often than not, it isn’t. With big employers, anyway.

Anyway, reading between the lines of the articles, it seems pretty clear that the employer here will be able to offer a legitimate reason for the discharge and it will be up to this woman to show that the reason is a pretext.

What’s suspsicious to me is that none of the articles contain this official reason. For example, the woman could have said “when they fired me, they told me it was for violating the employee discount policy, but I never did so.” Or something like that. Usually when that information is not disclosed, it’s damaging to the employee. (Of course here, it’s hard to tell if the reporter even asked that question.)

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749.md?page=8)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-need-time-off-for-surgery-youre-fired/492749.md?page=10)
