# You think the US has looting problems in Iraq? The UN can't even police itself.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [May 4, 2003, 4:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033 "2003-05-04T16:08:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Biggirl](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/biggirl/32/3294_2.png) [@Biggirl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Biggirl)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2003, 6:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/101 "2003-05-05T18:14:08Z")

</div>

This comparison to unruly people grabbing free food and Iraqi looters is just plain stupid whether it was made by Time or by **december.**

To take someone’s hyperbolic description of a food-fight to try to condemn the UN takes that stupidity to a new level. **december** did exactly this. What strawman are you talking about **Lib**?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2003, 6:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/102 "2003-05-05T18:15:02Z")

</div>

**Libertarian** , and the cafeteria at the UN building is not run by the UN.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mtgman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5a626/32.png) [@Mtgman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mtgman)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2003, 6:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/103 "2003-05-05T18:36:49Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Libertarian \*  
> **Chapter 15, Article 97 of the UN Charter designates the Secretary General as the chief _administrative_ officer. Article 100 forbids the Secretary General from seeking or receiving instructions with respect to his duties from “any government or from any other authority external to the Organization”.**

Correct. Full text of the charter can be found [here](http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/) if anyone is interested.\*\*

> [@](#):
>
> That includes subcontractors.\*\*

Que? How is entering into a contractual agreement with a third party “seeking or recieving instructions” with respect to his duties? The mandates on how the cafeteria will be staffed and how it will be run are one-directional. From the Secretary General TO the contracting firm. This statute gives him autonomy from state infrastructures which may try to force him to use a particular firm or comply with the contract laws in the host country. This means he is not responsible to the US department of labor to be sure he complies with affirmative action or the like. It places restrictions on who his SUPERIORS are, not who his underlings can be.

> [@](#):
>
> **He is charged by Article 101 with forming and overseeing the staffing of the UN’s bureaucracies. Section 3 of that Article specifically stipulates that "The paramount consideration in the employment of the staff and in the determination of the conditions of service shall be the necessity of securing the highest standards of efficiency, competence, and integrity."**

Again correct.\*\*

> [@](#):
>
> If there was disorder in the UN’s operations — to include looting in the restaurants and bars — the blame lies squarely with the Secretary General.\*\*

Again que? In the presence of a strike, chaos often IS the hightest standard of efficiency possible. I’m not sure what caused the strike and what, if any, control the Secretary General had over the situation, but lobbing this whole thing at his feet seems a bit unfair. For all we know there was a contracting company who had served faithfully for years and there was no sign of issues and some manager on their side made a crappy decision to cut pay/benefits or in some other manner alienated the workforce. Strike ensues and the first the Secretary General knows of it is when no one shows up for work one day. People still have to eat, so he, having no staff to serve them, declares self-service to be the order of the day and offsets the inconvenience with the carrot of making everything free(he has no way to charge them anyway because the staff who know how to operate the cash registers are on strike). What exactly was his fault in this situation? It is every bit as likely, given the facts we currently have, as a situation where he was culpable. Even if he was culpable, do you suggest the Secretary General in charge of the Secretariat building will be making decisions on the rebuilding of Iraq? How many divisions does he have?\*\*

> [@](#):
>
> Can you name even one instance, other than East Timor, in which the United Nations has done anything even remotely successful in that regard? \*\*

Not interested in this debate really. All I was interested in doing was showing that, when discussing the UN’s batting average, incidents like this don’t belong in the “strike” column.

Enjoy,  
Steven

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mtgman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5a626/32.png) [@Mtgman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mtgman)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2003, 6:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/104 "2003-05-05T18:43:26Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Libertarian \*  
> **Nonsense. Would you hire an accountant who cannot balance his own checkbook?**

No, but I would certainly hire an accountant who can’t sculpt. The two issues, keeping order in the cafeterias at the Secretariat building and keeping order in a war-torn country are completely apples an oranges. They’re handled completely differently with different people doing both the handling and overseeing the handlers. Why can’t you understand that?\*\*

> [@](#):
>
> If this had happened in, say, the State Department’s cafeterias, the liberals would be lined up to scream how incompetent the Bush administration is. \*\*

**If** this occurs **then** they’ll be wrong too.

Enjoy,  
Steven

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sailor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a587f6/32.png) [@sailor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sailor)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2003, 7:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/105 "2003-05-05T19:30:04Z")

</div>

Funny how december has bowed out and yet Lib continues the stupid fight.

Lib, since that is the way you see it (and you seem to be the only one left) can you explain to me how a country like the USA, which made such a mess of its own presidential elections, would be qualified to organise elections anywhere? This seems much more relevant to me than a cafeteria strike in the UN.

Also, we have had threads about people being pigs at events where food and beverages were free. Does that mean the organizers are disqualified for whatever they do?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Coldfire](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a587f6/32.png) [@Coldfire](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Coldfire)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2003, 11:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/106 "2003-05-05T23:29:48Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by december \*  
> \*\*Fair enough. I have begun a Great Debate on this topic over [here](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=181918). \*\*

I’ve responded to your “debate”, mostly by saying it has fuck all to do with the topic at hand here. If you wish to debate that the UN has its faults, and if you wish to prove the past failures of UN peace keeping missions, have at it.

For some reason, you neglected to mention in that GD that a free UN luncheon gone bad because of a strike is somehow indicative of this failure to carry out decent peace keeping missions. Perhaps because the GD crowd would shove those arguments straight back up your ass, from whence they came?

I have but one word for you, sir.

**WEASEL**

Good night.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![december](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/838e76/32.png) [@december](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/december)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2003, 12:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/107 "2003-05-06T00:41:27Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Coldfire \*  
> \*\*For some reason, you neglected to mention in that GD that a free UN luncheon gone bad because of a strike is somehow indicative of this failure to carry out decent peace keeping missions. \*\*

Sorry I missed your point. Let’s try again:

UN diplomats and employees have created messes in some of their missions, including

_– permitting a massacre in Srebrenica,  
– permitting rapes and physical attacks in a mental institution in Kosovo,  
– permitting years of non-compliance by Iraq  
– permitting the theft of money and support for terrorism in the West Bank  
– permitting systematic rape in Sierra Leone_

These are serious matters.

In this thread,we see UN diplomats and employees:

_– permitting minor rioting and looting by themselves_

This is not a serious matter, but it is indicative of the serious matters listed above. They all reflect bad morale – an attitude of not really caring.

Furthermore, since this minor rioting and looting is the opposite of the UN’s intent, many of us see the event as funny or ironic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Coldfire](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a587f6/32.png) [@Coldfire](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Coldfire)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2003, 12:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/108 "2003-05-06T00:47:47Z")

</div>

**december** , please provide evidence for your first list of five transgressions. Make sure the verb “permitted” is somehow justified by that evidence.

Then, prove to us that the cafeteria incident is somehow indicative of it.

“Funny” or “ironic” doesn’t cut it. Look at your thread title, and provide the necessary proof.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![december](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/838e76/32.png) [@december](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/december)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2003, 2:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/109 "2003-05-06T02:33:45Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Coldfire \*  
> **december** , please provide evidence for your first list of five transgressions.

The cites are on the other thread in GD (except for Srebrenica, which you know about.)

> [@](#):
>
> Then, prove to us that the cafeteria incident is somehow indicative of it.

“indicative” means “Pointing out; bringing to notice; giving intimation or knowledge of something not visible or obvious.” Or, in fine arts, it means “Suggestive; representing the whole by a part.”

In my judgment, this minor illustration of bad morale by UN employees at the UN cafeteria was suggestive. It gave an intimation of bad morale by UN employees in more serious settings. YMMV.

> [@](#):
>
> “Funny” or “ironic” doesn’t cut it. Look at your thread title, and provide the necessary proof.

If you’re saying that this one incident doesn’t prove that the US would do a better job in post-war Iraq than the UN would, then I agree with you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![samclem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a9a28c/32.png) [@samclem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/samclem)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2003, 3:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/110 "2003-05-06T03:16:16Z")

</div>

Let’s see. If the looting of the museum in Bagdad occurred on the watch of George Bush, then the US Government, especially one of Republicans, is a failure. They can’t even control some pissant group of rioters and thieves who stole all the silverware, er uh, _treasures_, yeah, that’s it, treasures in that museum. This is indicative of everthing that the US does when it tries to police the World. It sucks. It’s a failure.

**december** is expected. **Lib** must be bored.

Disappointing. This thread gets a 2.5 from the French judge. 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chula](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a4c791/32.png) [@chula](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chula)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2003, 3:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/111 "2003-05-06T03:45:48Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by december \*  
> **– permitting systematic rape in Sierra Leone**

This is false _and you know it is false_ because I pointed it out in the other thread you started. The U.N. helped end the systematic rape in Sierra Leone, and if you continue to say otherwise you are a liar.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Coldfire](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a587f6/32.png) [@Coldfire](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Coldfire)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2003, 8:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/112 "2003-05-06T08:02:08Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by december \*  
> **"indicative" means “Pointing out; bringing to notice; giving intimation or knowledge of something not visible or obvious.” Or, in fine arts, it means "Suggestive; representing the whole by a part."**

Amazing enough, I knew what the word meant, **december**. I also knew your OP didn’t fall into the “fine arts” category.

> [@](#):
>
> \*\*In my judgment, this minor illustration of bad morale by UN employees at the UN cafeteria was suggestive. It gave an intimation of bad morale by UN employees in more serious settings. YMMV. If you’re saying that this one incident doesn’t prove that the US would do a better job in post-war Iraq than the UN would, then I agree with you. \*\*

Well, we tried. In various ways, you’ve said nothing more than words to the effect of:

_“I think that a free luncheon, where some silverware was alledgedly removed from the cafetaria in a UN building after a personnel strike caused delays in the distribution of the free food, an incident for which I have one cite, which relies on a handful of unverified eye witnesses, is important as an analogy to the overall ethics of the entire United Nations, and the various peace keeping operations they are deployed in across the globe. Furthermore, I’ll go as far as to call the taking of free food “looting”, and I also won’t bother to verify whether the silverware was actually stolen, or merely borrowed because people had their dinner elsewhere because of capacity problems in the restaurant. To top it all off, I have no problem with suggesting that this is somehow similar to nationwide looting of national treasures, some millenia old, in post-invasion Iraq.”_

My hat’s off to you, sir. You’re a class act.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/original/2X/e/e489c3b7d8fce19c4b355dd4fc3f88cc39c34b87.png) [@system](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2003, 8:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/113 "2003-05-06T08:04:54Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Libertarian \*  
> Personally, I believe that the UN has demonstrated again and again its inability to build nations, establish peace, or guarantee stability. It is rather corrupt and impotent.

I hope that Lib has some vaguely rational basis for the above assertions, and citations to why particular UN efforts were failures.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Banquet\_Bear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/banquet_bear/32/373_2.png) [@Banquet\_Bear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Banquet_Bear)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2003, 8:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/114 "2003-05-06T08:25:33Z")

</div>

…to be honest, having been Functions Manager for Bellamys Parliamentary Caterers in New Zealand, it is easy to see how stories like these can get blowen out of proportion. I cannot, due to contract restrictions, discuss any particular incident, however, it was not uncommon to pick up the newspaper, read one of the “Human Interest Stories”, and go "WHAT THE FRELL? When did that happen?

Being the Parliamentary Caterer-we were always in the public eye-and it never took a lot to turn an incident where the “scones were a bit salty” to “guests were running from the restaurant, gasping for water”… and speaking of which-we should take the story cited in the OP with a healty grain of salt…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2003, 9:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/115 "2003-05-06T09:54:48Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Collounsbury \*  
> \*\*I hope that Lib has some vaguely rational basis for the above assertions, and citations to why particular UN efforts were failures. \*\*

I think you’re lying. Actually, you hope the opposite. What you pretend not to know is common knowledge. But I recall now that you said you don’t watch the news. Go to Google and type “UN failure Rwanda Cambodia Bosnia” to get a few thousand hits for starters. Like this one: [http://www.bard.edu/hrp/atrocities/intro.htm](http://www.bard.edu/hrp/atrocities/intro.htm)

> [@](#):
>
> These questions have become especially timely in light of the UN’s failure to enforce the war crimes provisions of the Dayton Accords in former Yugoslavia. Today, in The Hague, a UN-sponsored tribunal awaits the delivery of the indicted Bosnian Serb military and political leaders. The court’s original prosecutor, Richard Goldstone, silenced critics who maintained that the tribunal was convened to serve the political will of the UN Security Council. In July of 1995, they issued two indictments that changed the nature of this endeavor. Serb political and military leaders Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic were charged with genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. Trying such leaders is much more complex than trying garden-variety war criminals like Duso Tadic. Moreover, these indictments have no statute of limitations and come with an international arrest warrant. Three years later the defendants are still at large and the Western occupation forces have proved unwilling to uphold the Dayton Accords.
> 
> The clearest act of genocide of the post World War II era occurred in Rwanda in 1994. In less than four months, an estimated 800,000 members of the Tutsi tribe were massacred by their Hutu rivals. Recently, a United Nations tribunal in Arusha, Tanzania, handed down the first sentence for war crimes in Rwanda. The ongoing civil war has made many witnesses unwilling to cooperate with the court. Two witnesses who testified in the trial of George Rutaganda were killed when they returned to Rwanda. To further complicate matters, the Rwanda government has largely refused to cooperate with the UN court and instead held its own trials. Presently, there are more than 120,000 in jail awaiting summary justice in Rwanda.
> 
> Perhaps Cambodia is the modern paradigm for the resolution of a genocidal conflict and Nuremberg is the anomaly. Between 1975 and 1979, the Cambodian nation was subjected to some of the most extreme human rights violations of the twentieth century. In approximately four years, one million people- an estimated 10% of the population- died. The Khmer Rouge violated the Nuremberg Principles, the UN Charter, the laws of war, and possibly the UN Genocide Convention. Although the UN launched the most costly and ambitious social engineering experiment in the organization’s history, no individuals have ever been tried, let alone punished for the massive atrocities in Cambodia.
> 
> Over the weekend of July 4, 1997, Cambodians watched as their elected leader was deposed, opposition members were summarily executed, and the country returned to one-party rule under Hun Sen. In July 1998, Hun Sen staged and won an election to legitimize his power grab. Despite the most costly and ambitious intervention in UN history, democracy failed to take root in the war-torn nation. The case of Cambodia raises an uncomfortable question: are Cambodia, Bosnia, and Rwanda systematic failures of the UN’s approach to conflict resolution? Is it possible to uphold and enforce the human rights provisions of the UN Charter and Declaration of Human Rights? These questions are pressing in light of the UN’s failure to enforce the war crimes provisions of the Dayton Accords in former Yugoslavia and the ongoing chaos in Rwanda and Tanzania.

There are many more. Do your own homework.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Desmostylus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c57346/32.png) [@Desmostylus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Desmostylus)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2003, 10:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/116 "2003-05-06T10:06:38Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Libertarian \*  
> \*\*I think you’re lying. Actually, you hope the opposite. \*\*

::splort::

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/original/2X/e/e489c3b7d8fce19c4b355dd4fc3f88cc39c34b87.png) [@system](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2003, 10:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/117 "2003-05-06T10:13:23Z")

</div>

I have done my homework Lib, my dear fellow, I have.

I also note that googling and getting hits is… well pretty fucking stupid.

I’m talking substance, in other words **analysis** : we can all point to wrinkles and failings, as noted in the GD thread, but where is the motherfucking benchmark. Life is not an utupia, although following your Libertopia threads it appears you have severe difficulties grappling with that.

In the case of the linked article, we have a focus on a few incidents, however what is the overall result.

Example, in Cambodia the country is clearly more stable and better off than it was before. There is a relative and absolute improvement on all indices. But the effort does fall far short of being perfect, or even pretty good benchmarked against an ideal democratic state. The open question however, has any country in similar circumstances from similar backgrounds been propelled into that state?

Turning to Bosnia, again the reconstruction effort now almost a decade later at least has achieved some degree of peace. Peace Keeping early on was a failure, but then as the analytical articles you can access argue, that was largely due to the UN forces not getting committments adequate to the job from anyone. The UN not being a magical entity, really depends on the committments from countries like the US. Of course at the time the US refused to get involved in any substantive way. Whose name gets the black mark then?

And so on.

Now if Lib wants to argue - actually argue - perhaps he can advance some intellectually respectable standards to judge this on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2003, 10:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/118 "2003-05-06T10:20:13Z")

</div>

Moronic. You think the US wasn’t involved in Bosnia? You think a million people being massacred is a UN success? You think the UN helped make the lives of Cambodians better? And you think you’ve contributed some sort of analysis here? Changing the questions, dodging the realities, and making stuff up does not constitute analysis. I give your homework an “F”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sailor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a587f6/32.png) [@sailor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sailor)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2003, 11:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/119 "2003-05-06T11:38:47Z")

</div>

Liberterian it is you against the whole world. Don’t you think there’s a chance your views might be mistaken? Well, I don’t know why I even ask seeing how your view of the world, as evidenced in other threads, is quite weird and that is putting it mildly.

At any rate, you are changing the topic and not answering my questions which I shall repeat here, not because I expect any coherent response but just to leave record of how you are ignoring and fudging and weaseling and not answering and generally making a fool of yourself.

Question #1: How does the incident of a chaotic cafeteria situation caused by a worker’s strike indicate the UN is not up to the task of doing its mission? This is the gist of the OP as reflected by

> [@](#):
>
> You think the US has looting problems in Iraq? The UN can’t even police itself  
> . . . .  
> To observe that the UN isn’t as good at it’s ought to be at certain tasks.

Question #2: If it follows that the UN should be disqualified from peacekeeping missions because of the incident, wouldn’t it follow with much more reason that the USA should be disqualified from organizing elections anywhere due to the fiasco of the last presidential election?

By this reasoning evrybody would be disqualified from everything. I am told Mother Theresa locked herself out of the house once.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/original/2X/e/e489c3b7d8fce19c4b355dd4fc3f88cc39c34b87.png) [@system](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2003, 1:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033/120 "2003-05-06T13:09:51Z")

</div>

Lib try to flail about so much, it’s unbecoming.

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Libertarian \*  
> Moronic. You think the US wasn’t involved in Bosnia?

Nope, did not say that. On this I grant my terse comment above lacked clarity - I was thinking of december’s mention of the enclave collapse and the initial period. The US did not commit much in resources to Yugoslavia until the events of 1995. Indeed American conservatives were very much against the effort, and we were withholding funding to UN at the time.

> [@](#):
>
> You think a million people being massacred is a UN success?

You mean in Bosnia? Obviously not, however once sufficient resources were devoted, efforts turned to the better. Mixed bag, but clearly better than without.

> [@](#):
>
> You think the UN helped make the lives of Cambodians better?

Yes, in the framework of the conflict resolution they did.

> [@](#):
>
> And you think you’ve contributed some sort of analysis here?

No, Lib my dear, I highlighted your flailing about and lack of critical judgment.

> [@](#):
>
> Changing the questions, dodging the realities, and making stuff up does not constitute analysis. I give your homework an “F”.

Amusing, considering you are not even remotely qualified to grade me.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033.md?page=5)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/you-think-the-us-has-looting-problems-in-iraq-the-un-cant-even-police-itself/173033.md?page=7)
