Sure you’re not thinking of Colon Blow? I can’t link to them from work since it’s websensed :rolleyes: but they are actually one of the more sensible outfits - they’re pretty upfront about it being (literally) for shits’n’giggles. They even throw in a ‘It’s Good To Poop’ pen with their orders. A colleague ordered some stuff from them a while back to help him get back to normal after the christmas gorging season.
Uggg… I had this same convo with my neighbour, except she swear the toxins flows to your feet when you sleep too. I just don’t believe because I don’t understand. :rolleyes:
It doesn’t seem to support his story about identical products being sold side by side in the early days of organic produce - which I would expect to be mentioned if it were true.
To be honest, the story as you’ve related it sounds like the sort of uninformed nonsense you might hear on the subject from a taxi driver or pub landlord.
I had them partly out of interest-just to see what the experience was like, and also to see if it made any difference to me and the way I feel.
I have to say I haven’t noticed a huge amount of difference. It was very strange having a load of crap and bile rushing out of you for 45mins (mostly bile for me), but afterwards apart from feeling a bit drained I haven’t noticed any difference. And no weight loss.
But then I should add I’m a bit obsessively healthy on an anorexic level and so don’t eat anything that is 100% natural, and run 20km a day. If i ate hamburgers, smoked and drank maybe it would be a different matter.
Isn’t it dangerous to do 3 in 10 days…and to run 20km a day!? How many miles is that? Anything on an anorexic level cannot, by definition, be healthy. Not trying to be a shit, just hoping that you are being healthy enough!
I’m not particularly healthy at the moment-I have anaemia and other anorexia related problems, but ‘think’ I’m being healthy in what I do. But I wasn’t trying to promote that- I was just stating that colonics don’t necessarily make any difference to some people.
The health clinic told me to have the three in 10days- the first two were back to back over two days and the third was a week after the second one. If it was dangerous its too late now to do anything about it!!
Just because something you think should be mentioned in Wikipedia wasn’t mentioned, I don’t think that justifies you insulting my biology professor who, with all due respect, had a PhD in a very relevant field and probably knew just a little bit more about the subject than you. Maybe you’re right, maybe you’re not, but knock it off with the snark, especially when you’re admittedly just guessing.
Cisco, it may in fact be that I have misunderstood your initial point - if it was that some instances of organic food labelling were and still are fraudulent, I have no quibble - I’m certain it happens. But the paraphrased quote from your biology professor appeared to be going quite a bit further, and claiming that the organic movement was substantially and fundamentally fraudulent, until regulatory bodies started flexing their muscles.
If that wasn’t what you meant, then I apologise for the misunderstanding - and for what you describe as snark (even though it wasn’t intended that way).
If that was what you meant, then I think the case needs more supporting data - not just individual examples.
Fair enough, and sorry for dragging out a hijack.
To go back to the previous point, however, I don’t think ‘organic’ or ‘chemical free’ are either wrong or misleading terms to be used to describe retail products in a non-scientific context - any more or less than, say, ‘cheesy’ - which may be used to describe a movie that has nothing whatever to do with fermented dairy products.