deleted
If you had any real world experience, you would know that a normal man doesn’t consider women to be superior beings, yet he is not afraid to have a healthy sex life either. He is not afraid that some woman will cry “rape”, because the chances of that are so remote, for any woman actually worth dating, that it’s not worth worrying about.
But you don’t have any real world experience in this area, so it’s all just theory to you.
Der Trihs – do you hear voices? Does Elvis talk to you? Does he tell you to burn things?
Let’s see; according to the people in this thread I’m a virgin who relentlessly sexually exploits women. Behold! I am Paradox! *
And the “normal man” you speak of is simply being foolhardy. Would you say it is foolish for a woman to worry about being raped because after all, any man worth dating won’t rape her? Would it be foolish of her to worry in a society where rapists faced little to no penalty for rapes?
Now there’s a classic; don’t address the issues, just claim the other person is insane.
Do you hear Elvis? Does he tell you to burn things?
- Really, this is classic man bashing; claim he’s either a sexual predator or a virgin. All you have to do now is claim I must be gay and you’ll complete the collection! If I was a woman you’d be implying that I was a slut I’m sure.
We’ve tried “addressing your issues”. We’ve pointed out the problems with them, and you refuse to budge.
And it’s true – you come off as a fucking loon.
Calling you a virgin accomplishes two things here: it displays ridicule (which is, I agree, rather puerile); but it also highlights your comical beliefs about the behaviors of, and dangers presented by, women. Your sexual experience doesn’t have any bearing on anything, but the caricature you fear belies having had any significant amount of friendly interaction with women. So for those who wish to ridicule you the charge of “virgin” seems apropos.
As for sexual predation … well, all arguments about legalities aside, taping a sexual encounter without the knowledge of one’s partner seems (to me) dangerously close to sexual predation. And to the extent that one is genuinely afraid of sociopathic behavior on the part of one’s partner, it would seem much more prudent to avoid such encounters entirely.
Look, nobody says you shouldn’t take reasonable precautions. I mean, as the saying goes, “Don’t put your dick in the crazy.”
But you mistrust women so much that you are unable to let down your guard enough to ever have sex at all in any kind of real world situation. That’s not the kind of life I want to lead, and I would say the vast majority of men would agree.
And if a woman gets raped, it’s all her fault. I mean, as the saying goes, “Don’t date people who look rapey”. Also don’t go down dark alleys, because that’s where the rapists are.
Blaming the victim: it’s fun when the victim is male.
You are totally missing the point: If there actually IS a victim, that is, if a man actually IS the victim of a scamming woman. then he certainly is not to be blamed.
But to live your life assuming that all woman are like that, before there is any victim at all, is to ensure that you never get laid at all.
The analogy with women is this: Of course a woman who is raped is not to be blamed. She is the victim. But she should not go through life assuming that all men are rapists. If she does she’ll never be in a normal relationship with a man.
TRANSLATION ALERT!!!
What Der is REALLY saying here is:
Well, since my mindless position is not silencing my critics and I can’t convince anyone of the validity of my inane posting and opinions, I’m taking my ball and bat and going home! sniffle