Straight Dope Message Board > Main Silly Helicopter Question
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

 Thread Tools Display Modes
#1
06-02-1999, 05:59 PM
 Guest
I know it's not possible for helicopters to continuously run for several hours (fuel concerns) but IF IT WERE...

Imagine you boarded a copter, fired it up and hovered for several hours (overnight, for example)...when morning came would you be in a different spot then where you boarded, the earth having theoretically rotated beneath the hovering helicopter?

------------------
Tim
"My hovercraft is full of eels."
 Advertisements
#2
06-02-1999, 06:28 PM
 Guest
The helicopter is in the Earth's atmosphere. As you may have noticed, the air tends to spin around with the Earth.
#3
06-02-1999, 07:00 PM
 Guest
Theoretically, yes, but not by lifting "straight" up. Simply being aloft does not divorce you from the forces that were acting on you before liftoff. When your helicopter was sitting on the launch pad, it was apparently motionless, right? But in reality, it was sitting on a globe whizzing around with a rotational speed of approximately 1,000 miles per hour.

So when you lift "straight" off, you are still subject to the same 1,000 mph rotational velocity that you were when on the ground. Without compensating for this, the result is a curving arc: slight motion in the Y direction as you lift off, but breakneck speed in the X direction.

This curving trajectory of an object launched from a rotating object is what’s known as the Coriolis effect, and is what makes launching a rocket "rocket science." The rocket doesn’t just go straight up to its intended target (be it the moon, Mars, or Earth orbit), but instead – just like your helicopter – curves to the side as well.

So in order to stay "motionless" with respect to space, you’ve got to overcome that high-velocity send-off. To do so, you’d have to fly your helicopter in the opposite direction of Earth’s spin, which would give you a relative ground speed of 1,000 mph.

From the point of view of a motionless outside observer somewhere in space, you would then indeed seem stationary, but to you, inside the helicopter, it would seem like you’re cruising away at nearly twice the speed of sound!

Hope that helps.

------------------
~ Complacency is far more dangerous than outrage ~
#4
06-02-1999, 07:04 PM
 Guest
Wouldn't be able to sit there very long. Eventually it would push away the air that holds it up, and it would fall down.
#5
06-02-1999, 07:36 PM
 Guest
The great inventor Nikola Tesla once speculated that a great mode of transportation would be if you could construct a hollow ring around the earth, unaffected by its rotational forces. By transporting yourself to this ring, you could travel 1000 mph anywhere you wanted to go, with almost no energy required.
If you are having trouble with the helicopter question, try looking at it this way: if you throw a baseball straight up, it comes straight back down, it doesnt fly away at 1000 mph
#6
06-03-1999, 01:37 PM
 Guest
To expand on this topic a bit:

Does an airliner flying from LA to NY actually travel a greater distance than one would flying from NY to LA?

If so, shouldn't they be adjusting frequent flyer miles?
#7
06-04-1999, 09:15 AM
 Guest
Sly: in a way, yes, a plane does travel farther in the LA to NY direction.

Obviously, the amount of terrestrial miles traveled is the same, but looked at from the point of view of an observer in space, the number of ... uh, call them celestial miles is greater east to west than from west to east.

And even if we could convince all the airlines to switch over to counting frequent flier bonuses in celestial miles, it still wouldn't do you any good. While the celestial miles would be great LA to NY, you'd get screwed on the return trip.

It's kind of like mountain driving: lousy mileage on the way up, killer mileage back down, but it all evens out in the end.

------------------
~ Complacency is far more dangerous than outrage ~
#8
06-04-1999, 11:19 AM
 Guest
If you can argue that the rotation of the Earth is a large factor in prevailing winds, then the oposite is true. Atmosphericly the trip from LA to NY is shorter. If two airliners taking off at the same time (one from LA and the other from NY) each maintain an airspeed (as opposed to ground speed) of 500 miles, the LA plane will land in NY before the NY plane lands in LA.

 Bookmarks

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is Off HTML code is Off
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Main     About This Message Board     Comments on Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports     Straight Dope Chicago     General Questions     Great Debates     Elections     Cafe Society     The Game Room     In My Humble Opinion (IMHO)     Mundane Pointless Stuff I Must Share (MPSIMS)     Marketplace     The BBQ Pit Side Conversations     The Barn House

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.

 Contact Us - Straight Dope Homepage - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.