|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Prince Albert in a can
I've always been mystified by this joke:
Prank Caller: "Do you have Prince Albert in a can?" Callee: "Yes." Prank Caller: "Well, you better let him out!" I don't get it. What the hell is the caller referring to? Where did this expression come from? And why is it funny? |
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The call would be made to a tobacco shop, hopefully one that sold Prince Albert tobacco.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's just a silly prank like
"Is your refrigerator running?" ... "Better go catch it!" |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
And, for the slang-challenged among you, "can" is a euphemism for "toilet."
("Does your nose run and your feet smell?" "You're built upside-down!") |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Well that doesn't make a lick of sense! |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The whole sequence is. Call to a tobacco retailer - "Do you have Prince Albert in the can? Yes. Well, let him out!" Hang up amid much giggling. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, the joke in the OP is funny. And lsura's answer was correct.
I'm questioning Eve. The joke has nothing to do with cans in the sense I use to drop the kids off at the pool. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, now I get what she's saying, but as a kid I never associated the joke with keeping the actual prince in the toilet. I thought of it as keeping the actual prince in an actual can.
Meh. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Agreed Eleusis.
The point of the joke is that you are conveying the idea to the tobacco store owner (or drug store owner) that Prince Albert is actually stuck in that can of tobacco and he is suffocating and so the owner had better let him out. And when my friends and I made those crazy phone calls, we never thought the point of the joke was that Prince Albert was stuck in a toilet. It may have been 15 years ago (maybe more), when I read a full-page article in the newspaper that Prince Albert would no longer be sold in a can. (Shocking isn't it?) And how did the article begin? "Do you have Prince Albert in a can?" to which a kindly tobacco store owner would grudgingly answer "Yes we do", etc. And how come Prince Albert is no longer being sold in a can? It would be hilarious to think that the endless amount of phone pranks finally proved to be too much for the tobacco company and its vendors. No, the answer is more utilitarian than that. Prince Albert is now being sold only in a pouch because 1) It is cheaper than using a metal can and 2) The pouch actually keeps the tobacco fresher. Well, it was a story that had to be told. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
The word "can" for "toilet" is the opposite of a euphemism; it's a dysphemism.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Complete the explanation.
"Prince Albert" was and maybe still is a shredded tobacco used for rolling-your-own cigarretes. It came in a distinctive, mostly red, can with a litho of the real Prince Albert on the front. The can was of about 5/8" thick, 3" wide and 5" or 6" high with a flip top lid. About the right size to carry in a hip pocket.
Now the question: "Do you have Prince Albert in a/the can?" and the retort to a "Yes" answer makes the joke. "Let him out."
__________________
Do nothing simply if a way can be found to make it complex and wonderful spingears |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
The toilet was always the point of the joke, at least to me: "Do you have the future King of England locked in the toilet?"
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
The "can" can be both the "toilet" and the "bathroom", in which case, Prince Albert in the can could refer to him being locked in the bathroom, which is funny. It makes WAY more sense than a human being locked in a tiny tin.
__________________
The poster formerly known as "EchoKitty" |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Not the dumbest knife in the drawer |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
"King of England"??? Prince Albert would never have been the King of England... That's why he was only a "prince" while married to Queen Victoria... The same way that the current Prince Phillip could never be King of England even though he's married to QEII...
Am I right folks?? |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
you're right as far as im aware. A King outranks a Queen (don't jump down my throat anyone, I didn't make up the rules of pageantry) thus if the reigning Monarch is a Queen, her consort would be a Prince (specifically a Prince-Consort), however if the reigning monarch is a King, his consort becomes a Queen.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brit checking in:
Quite right, a Prince Consort is never in line to the throne. Nor is a Queen Consort. On the death of King George VI the throne passed to his elder daughter, now Queen Elizabeth II, although his wife was alive, well, and had nearly fifty years to live. She was called Queen ("Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother") for the rest of her life but wasn't remotely in the line of succession. and any right she did have would have been via her parentage and not through her own marriage. The batting order at the moment is: Charles Charles's sons in order of age (William and Harry) Andrew Andrew's daughters in order of age (Beatrice and Eugenie) Edward Edward's daughter Anne Anne's son Peter Anne's daughter Zara. As soon as William or Harry becomes a father, Andrew and everyone below moves down a seat. Philip is somewhere down the list, as IIRC he is a descendent of Queen Victoria, but before he could get the crown there would have to be an avalanche of suspicious deaths that would make all of the Diana conspiracy theories look like starters. Of course, if someone rings up and says "Have you got Prince Albert in a pouch?" he can still use the same punchline if the tobacconist cooperates. Eve was nearly right, in that George VI was known as "Bertie" before he was crowned, just as his brother Edward VIII was known as "David". Charlie will probably stick with his real name to be crowned by, though.
__________________
SDMB chess champion 2010 |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh fer chrissake . . .
OK, I was wrong, no one named Albert is, every was or ever will be in line for the throne of England. Are you over it and can we get back to the important issue of whether any royal named Albert was locked in a tiny can or in the bathroom?!
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
BTW, Simpons 15x04 (The Regina Monologues) has Marge and Homer walking by an person-high "Prince Albert in a Can" around 10:00 while shopping at "Harrods Department store".
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
I came in thinking that there may have been some urban mythic horror about finding a "vienna sausage" or "hotdog" with a ring through it. It would have been more interesting. I guess it would have made more sense with a vienna sausage since those usually come in cans but the poor guy who lost his prince albert and the attaching parts would not have been very well hung.
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
I weep for today's youth. With Called ID becoming more and more prevalent, prank calling is becoming a thing of the past.
Gone forever are the days of calling the bowling alley and asking the attendant if he has 8-pound balls ("Holy crap, how big are your pants?") or calling the KFC and asking the guy if he has chicken wings. ("Must be hard to buy shirts then!")
__________________
"Shut up, listen and learn!" - Kevin Spacey, "Swimming With Sharks" Official Doper Brat Inductee, 2004
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Owning a computer store I once got the following call:
“Do you have Prince Albert in a can?” “No. This is a computer store.” “Well, you better… uh… what?” “I said, ‘No, this is a computer store.’ We don’t sell tobacco.” “Oh.” (long pause) “Do you know anyone who does sell tobacco? Do you have their phone number?” |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm just amazed that this classic prank call has hung on for as long as it has, especially in America. All of the important referents are nearly unknown to the prank-call target demographic. How many know who Prince Albert was, or have seen a can of loose tobacco, or even know where to find a tobacco shop?
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was wondering if this was the same Prince Albert whom the penile peircing is named for.
__________________
_______________ "You need to have performed three miracles to become a saint, and two of them can be card tricks." - Snooooopy |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What strikes me is that I don't think I've heard one of these things that wouldn't have worked 30 years ago. Surely new types of businesses and merchandise has created new possibilities. Not to mention the survival of some of them long past the passing of the relevent referents, as observed by paperbackwriter. Actually I just wanted an excuse to add the call to the butcher "Do you have pig's feet?" - "Well, wear shoes and nobody will notice".
__________________
... and with these words we parted each feeling superior to the other and is not that feeling after all one of the great desiderata of social intercourse archy |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't know about the piercing, but...........
Quote:
Note the double meanings of Prince Albert/tobacco, can/toilet. It is the double meaning selected by the inquirer and contrary meaning assumed by the smoke shop owner that make the joke. Smoke shops are alive and thirving in TN USA. Some even carry strange upstart brands such as "Grim Reaper."
__________________
Do nothing simply if a way can be found to make it complex and wonderful spingears |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
- Do you have Cap'n Crunch in a box? *Yes, we do, sir! Would you like that with or without Crunchberries? - (He said 'yeah'! NOW what?) Uh, so, uh... well, do you have Sara Lee in a box? *I believe the Sara Lee delivery is being stocked right now, sir! Are you interested in pies, cakes, or cookies? - (Yeah, yeah! They have that too!) Uh, OK. Cool. Uh, do you have Dad's Root Beer in cans? (What? Oh, shit!) Well, YOU BETTER LET HIM OUT! Oh, and BurnMeUp... Yes.
__________________
NOT being a jerk since May, 2003. |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just in case anyone is keeping track...
I never heard anyone consider that Prince Albert might be in the toilet. With all due respect, that makes no sense to me whatsoever. The question "Do you have Prince Albert in a can" is a legitimate question to a tobacco shop. That's what makes the punch line so funny. Well. At least to bunch of bored third graders. (Not that I'm admitting I ever made that call. )
|
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ahh, I get it
I can understand how this "joke" could be confused over. In fact, I never got the joke up until now either.
Up here where I live (Saskatchewan, Canada), there is a city named Prince Albert, and concequently, I have never heard of or even seen any "Prince Albert" brand cigarettes (even on my many visits to the U.S.). For years I tried to comprehend what was so funny about the city of Prince Albert being shoved into a can and laughed over
__________________
Tick tock tick tock... |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
My favorite is going to the Meat Department where I work
and asking the lady behind the counter: "Do you have crab legs?" "Yeah." "Well you ought to see a doctor for that."
|
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
HEhehe, my favorite was always: Hello, is do you have John there? No, I'm sorry, you have the wrong number. Then where do you go to pee!? Much yuks. Prince Albert tobacco-I thought the Prince Albert in question here would be his son, Prince Albert who became Edward VII. Certainly, that's the guy on the package-it's definitely a picture of Edward VII and not Albert Sr.
__________________
-Praise Ceiling Cat, who be watchin yu, may him has a cheezburger ![]() ![]()
|
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
I never associated 'can' with 'toilet'.
As I heard it, the prank line was "You'd better let him out before he suffocates". That is, unless one has an airtight loo. Then I suppose either mental image is proper.
__________________
Humility and modesty are my two best traits |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Oh, waiter, do you serve tarts?"
"We serve anybody. Siddown, lady." |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If you say "Do you have Prince Albert in a can," you have in mind the Prince being inside the can of tobacco. If you say "Do you have Prince Albert in the can," (and this is the way I have mostly heard it) you are counting on the tobacconist to ignore the fact that you said "the" instead of "a," and you have in mind the Prince being locked in the toilet.
__________________
"We're lost, but we're making good time." - Lawrence Peter Berra. |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
"What's leather made from?" "Hide" "Why should I hide?" "No, no..HIDE..HIDE..the cows outside!" "Well, I'm not afraid of cows..let him come in!" (Sounds like Burns and Allen, maybe?) |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
...so, I called my mom. You know-the one who remembers Sears catalogues in the outhouse. She confirms that people did this in the 1930's.
Next, a column by Walter Winchell in 1945 says: Quote:
|
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is there a Little Fairy In Your House?
__________________
I have no idea what I am doing. |
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Is Steve Wall there?"
"No." "Is Dave Wall there?" "No." "What about Amy Wall?" "There are no Walls here!" "What's holding up your house, then? Toothpicks?" |
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
The poster formerly known as "EchoKitty" |
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
In "a" can or in "the" can is not significant. It wouldn't be at all unusual for some folks to say "Yeah, we've got it in the can or we've got it in the pouch."
Can = toilet does not apply in this case. If that were the case, the punchline would be different. People don't need to be let out of toilets. |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Talking Pictures |
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
"We're lost, but we're making good time." - Lawrence Peter Berra. |
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bart Simpson: Is my mom there? Her name's Amanda. Last name, Huggenkiss.
Moe, at Moe's Bar: Amanda Huggenkiss! I'm lookin' for Amanda Huggenkiss!! (Customers ROFL) Why, you little... ________________ Bridget: (inspired by Nott's made-up joke name, calling Miller's Bar on a cell phone from the bar) Is Anita Nothershot there? Bartender Melissa: Anita Nothershot? Anita Nothershot!! Customers: Over here! Anita Nothershot right here! I 'Nita Nothershot! Melissa, spotting her sister on the phone: I'll get you for that, Bridget!
__________________
Time is a paper frog. It won't croak, and it won't jump, even if you wind it. Do you believe it will catch paper flies? How about fly paper? |
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
[quote=Malacandra]Brit checking in:
The batting order at the moment is: Charles Charles's sons in order of age (William and Harry) Andrew Andrew's daughters in order of age (Beatrice and Eugenie) Edward Edward's daughter Anne Anne's son Peter Anne's daughter Zara. As soon as William or Harry becomes a father, Andrew and everyone below moves down a seat. Philip is somewhere down the list, as IIRC he is a descendent of Queen Victoria, but before he could get the crown there would have to be an avalanche of suspicious deaths that would make all of the Diana conspiracy theories look like starters. How long before you get to King Ralph?
__________________
When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|