March is Women's History Month!

And in that spirit, here’s a little history…

Today: Seneca Falls Convention

Resolved, that woman is man’s equal—was intended to be so by the Creator.
~The Declaration of Sentiments

156 years ago, when a group of women and men staged The Seneca Falls Convention, that was a radical notion. We take it for granted these days, indeed, have taken it for granted for years, along with myriad other things including that a woman has a right to control her body, she has a right to vote, and above all, she is largely free from the suffocating roles imposed on women for well over a millennium.

The Convention of 1848 is considered by many to be the birth of American Feminism. It kicked off what we now refer to as First Wave feminism. These women and men fought for equal status for women, for rights such as the right to hold property and the right not to be property once married. They tirelessly fought to give women the right to vote, a feat which was accomplished seventy years after the convention and fifty-four years after black men were enfranchised.

Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott brainstormed the notion for a women’s rights convention in 1840 while in Europe with their husbands to attend an anti-slavery convention. They were barred from the convention simply because they were women, and act which outraged them and solidified their conviction. Eight years later, at an impromptu meeting at Jane Hunt’s house in Waterloo, New York, the women and many of their friends decided the time was right. Ten days later the Convention opened. The main planners of the event were: Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Coffin Mott, James Mott, Amy Post, Frederick Douglass, Mary M’Clintock, Martha Coffin Wright, Jane Hunt, and Amelia Bloomer.

The founding document, which emerged during the convention, was penned by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, intentionally mirrored the Declaration of Independence, and was named The Declaration of Sentiments. The planners feared the Convention would be a failure, but were surprised to find 300 women, and men (many of whom brought their children) felt it was an important enough matter to turn out and express their support. The Declaration of Sentiments, with all its attendant Resolutions, is reprinted below, as is a list of names of people who signed it, including 32 men.

*~Declaration of Sentiments~

When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one portion of the family of man to assume among the people of the earth a position different from that which they have hitherto occupied, but one to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes that impel them to such a course.

We hold these truths to be self-evident; that all men and women are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights governments are instituted, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of those who suffer from it to refuse allegiance to it, and to insist upon the institution of a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and, accordingly, all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they were accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their duty to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of the women under this government, and such is now the necessity which constrains them to demand the equal station to which they are entitled.

The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has never permitted her to exercise her inalienable right to the elective franchise.

He has compelled her to submit to laws, in the formation of which she had no voice.

He has withheld from her rights which are given to the most ignorant and degraded men - both natives and foreigners.

Having deprived her of this first right as a citizen, the elective franchise, thereby leaving her without representation in the halls of legislation, he has oppressed her on all sides.

He has made her, if married, in the eye of the law, civilly dead.

He has taken from her all right in property, even to the wages she earns.

He has made her morally, an irresponsible being, as she can commit many crimes with impunity, provided they be done in the presence of her husband. In the covenant of marriage, she is compelled to promise obedience to her husband, he becoming, to all intents and purposes, her master - the law giving him power to deprive her of her liberty, and to administer chastisement.

He has so framed the laws of divorce, as to what shall be the proper causes of divorce, in case of separation, to whom the guardianship of the children shall be given; as to be wholly regardless of the happiness of the women - the law, in all cases, going upon a false supposition of the supremacy of man, and giving all power into his hands.

After depriving her of all rights as a married woman, if single and the owner of property, he has taxed her to support a government which recognizes her only when her property can be made profitable to it.

He has monopolized nearly all the profitable employments, and from those she is permitted to follow, she receives but a scanty remuneration.

He closes against her all the avenues to wealth and distinction, which he considers most honorable to himself. As a teacher of theology, medicine, or law, she is not known.

He has denied her the facilities for obtaining a thorough education - all colleges being closed against her.

He allows her in church, as well as State, but a subordinate position, claiming Apostolic authority for her exclusion from the ministry, and, with some exceptions, from any public participation in the affairs of the Church.

He has created a false public sentiment by giving to the world a different code of morals for men and women, by which moral delinquencies which exclude women from society, are not only tolerated but deemed of little account in man.

He has usurped the prerogative of Jehovah himself, claiming it as his right to assign for her a sphere of action, when that belongs to her conscience and her God.

He has endeavored, in every way that he could to destroy her confidence in her own powers, to lessen her self-respect, and to make her willing to lead a dependent and abject life.

Now, in view of this entire disfranchisement of one-half the people of this country, their social and religious degradation, - in view of the unjust laws above mentioned, and because women do feel themselves aggrieved, oppressed, and fraudulently deprived of their most sacred rights, we insist that they have immediate admission to all the rights and privileges which belong to them as citizens of these United States.

In entering upon the great work before us, we anticipate no small amount of misconception, misrepresentation, and ridicule; but we shall use every instrumentality within our power to effect our object. We shall employ agents, circulate tracts, petition the State and national Legislatures, and endeavor to enlist the pulpit and the press in our behalf. We hope this Convention will be followed by a series of Conventions, embracing every part of the country.
Firmly relying upon the final triumph of the Right and the True, we do this day affix our signatures to this declaration.

Resolutions:

Whereas, The great precept of nature is conceded to be, that “man shall pursue his own true and substantial happiness”. Blackstone in his Commentaries remarks, that this law of Nature being coeval with mankind, and dictated by God himself, is of course superior in obligation to any other. It is binding over all the globe, in all countries and at all times; no human laws are of any validity if contrary to this, and such of them as are valid, derive their force, and all their validity, and all their authority mediately and immediately from this original; therefore,

  Resolved, That all laws which prevent woman from occupying such a station in society as her conscience shall dictate, or which place her in a position inferior to that of man, are contrary to the great precept of nature, and therefore of no force or authority. 

  Resolved, That woman is man's equal - was intended to be so by the Creator, and the highest good of the race demands that she should be recognized as such. 

  Resolved, That the women of this country ought to be enlightened in regard to the laws under which they live, that they may no longer publish their degradation by declaring themselves satisfied with their present position, nor their ignorance, by asserting that they have all the rights they want. 

  Resolved, That inasmuch as man, while claiming for himself intellectual superiority, does accord to woman moral superiority, it is pre-eminently his duty to encourage her to speak and teach, as she has an opportunity, in all religious assemblies. 

  Resolved, That the same amount of virtue, delicacy, and refinement of behavior that is required of woman in the social state, should also be required of man, and the same transgressions should be visited with equal severity on both man and woman. 

  Resolved, That the objection of indelicacy and impropriety, which is so often brought against woman when she addresses a public audience, comes with a very ill-grace from those who encourage, by their attendance, her appearance on the stage, in the concert, or in feats of circus. 

  Resolved, That woman has too long rested satisfied in the circumscribed limits which corrupt customs and a perverted application of the Scriptures have marked out for her, and that it is time she should move in the enlarged sphere which her great Creator has assigned her. 

  Resolved, That it is the duty of women of this country to secure to themselves their sacred right to the elective franchise. 

  Resolved, That the equality of human rights results necessarily from the fact of the identity of the race in capabilities and responsibilities. 

  Resolved, That the speedy success of our cause depends upon the zealous and untiring efforts of both men and women, for the overthrow of the monopoly of the pulpit, and for the securing to women an equal participation with men in the various trades, professions, and commerce. 

  Resolved, therefore, That, being invested by the creator with the same capabilities, and the same consciousness of responsibility for their exercise, it is demonstrably the right and duty of woman, equally with man, to promote every righteous cause by every righteous means; and especially in regard to the great subjects of morals and religion, it is self - evidently her right to participate with her brother in teaching them, both in private and in public, by writing and by speaking, by any instrumentalities proper to be used, and in any assemblies proper to be held; and this being a self-evident truth growing out of the divinely implanted principles of human nature, any custom or authority adverse to it, whether modern or wearing the hoary sanction of antiquity, is to be regarded as a self - evident falsehood, and at war with mankind.*

Signers, many of whom were heckled and derided in the press:

Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Lucretia Coffin Mott
James Mott, Amy Post, Frederick Douglass,
Mary M’Clintock,
Martha Coffin Wright,
Jane Hunt,
Amelia Bloomer
Harriet Cady Eaton
Elizabeth M’Clintock
Mary M’Clintock
Margaret Pryor
Eunice Newton Foote
Margaret Schooley
Catherine F. Stebbins
Mary Ann Frink
Lydia Mount
Delia Matthews
Catharine C. Paine
Susan Quinn
Mary S. Mirror
Phebe King
Julia Ann Drake
Charlotte Woodard
Martha Underhill
Dorothy Matthews
Eunice Baker
Sarah R. Woods
Lydia Gild
Sarah Hoffman
Sarah A. Mosher
Mary E. Vail
Lucy Spaulding
Lavinia Latham
Sarah Smith
Eliza Martin
Maria E. Wilbur
Elizabeth D. Smith
Caroline Barker
Ann Porter
Experience Gibbs
Richard P. Hunt
Samuel D. Tillman
Justin Williams
Elisha Foote
Henry W. Seymour
David Salding
William G. Barker
Elias J. Doty
John Jones
William S. Dell
William Burroughs
Azaliah Schooley
Mary H. Hallowell
Sarah Hallowell
Catharine Shaw
Deborah Scott
Mary Gilbert
Sophrone Taylor
Cynthia Davis
Hannah Plant
Lucy Jones
Sarah Whitney
Elizabeth Conklin
Elizabeth Leslie
Martha Ridley
Rachel D. Bonnel
Betsey Tewksbury
Rhoda Palmer
Margaret Jenkins
Cynthia Fuller
Mary Martin
P.A. Culvert
Susan R. Doty
Rebecca Race
Antoinette E. Segur
Hannah J. Latham
Sarah Sisson
Malvina Seymour
Phebe Mosher
Joel Bunker
Isaac Van Tassel
Thomas Dell
E.W. Capron
Stephen Shear
Henry Hatley

My heroes, all of them. Because of the women who bore the brunt of derision and scorn, it’s become easier for all of us to participate in our society as full citizens with the same rights as men.

::Cues up “I Am Woman” on the MP3 player::

Robin

Really, I find this a little insensitive. Today we say “differently-genitaled”.

Today- American Saints

St. Frances Xavier Cabrini (1850-1917)

The first American citizen to be declared a saint by the Catholic Church, Maria Francesca Cabrini was born in Northern Italy and took vows there in 1877. When she established her order, The Missionary Sisters of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, she hoped to be assigned to China, but was sent to America instead. Arriving in 1889 with six Sisters in tow, she quickly established a convent, school and orphanage in New York. Similar compounds in New Orleans, Chicago, Denver, Seattle, and Los Angeles followed and later, hospitals. Cabrini and the Sisters also cared for prisoners, most of whom were sentenced to death. Among her international achievements were similar compounds in Nicaragua, Argentina, Brazil, and Panama. The order was later established firmly on the European continent as well. She took the oath of citizenship in Seattle in 1909. Efforts to canonize her in were started in1928 and she was elevated to sainthood in 1946, less than a hundred years after her birth.

St. Mary Ann Seton (1774-1821)

The first American-born person to be declared a saint, Mother Elizabeth Ann Seton founded the first American convent. She was a widow and mother of five when she converted to Catholicism, taking her vows in 1809. Her order, the Sisters of Charity of St. Joseph, were responsible for nursing, assisting the poor and teaching. Mother Seton is often credited with the creation of the first parochial school in America. She administered more than twenty orders nationwide while still mothering her own children. She died at age 46 of tuberculosis. Seton Hall College was named for her in 1856. Efforts at canonization began in 1907 and she was elevated to sainthood in 1975.

Note to mods: Any bio I post to this thread is original and written by me. There are no copyright issues to worry about, just in case you were wondering. I would never dream of putting the SDMB at risk. Thanks.

America’s Criminal Women

Mary Eugenia Jenkins Surratt (1817-1865)

On July 7th, 1865 the America put to death the first woman.

The story began on April 14, 1865, when, just days after the end of the war, John Wilkes Booth shot President Lincoln. His co-conspirator Lewis Powell stabbed, but did not kill Secretary of State William Seward, third in line for the presidency. Another conspirator, George Atzerodt was assigned to kill Vice President Johnson, but failed to even attempt his assignment.

The players involved in the assassination of President Lincoln were associated by Sarratt’s son via the boarding house she ran, and she had made two business trips to areas of southern sympathy shortly before, and Sarratt was convicted and hung in the fallout after that fateful day. That was the sum of the government’s case against her.

Sarratt’s cowardly son fled to Canada before capture but returned and stood trial in 1867. The trial was held under military law, and was prosecuted overly zealously in the case of this lone female, involving the suppression of evidence that would have cleared her. She was denied the opportunity to testify on her own behalf, and some of the men involved were intimidated into falsely testifying against her. To add insult to injury, the lawyers assigned to defend her learned of her conviction through the newspaper.

Sarratt was hung, along with four “accomplices,” while four others were given life sentences. Before the sentence was carried out, Lewis Powell, who was considered the “brains” of the operation, pleaded for Sarratt’s release and proclaimed her innocence.

Ethel Greenglass Rosenberg (1915-1953)

Ethel Greenglass Rosenberg and her husband Julius were sentenced to death on April 15, 1951. Mrs. Rosenberg was the first woman to be executed for espionage.

In the “red scare” the followed the second world war, and with the relatively open anti-Semitism of the era, Rosenberg was an easy target for government prosecutors. Her husband and brother were arrested in the summer of 1950; her arrest followed shortly after. There was no specific evidence offered to support the prosecution’s claim of espionage, and it was not until months later that they claimed that she had typed notes on atomic secrets for her brother. Both insisted on their innocence, but Rosenberg’s sister-in-law, Ruth Greenglass (who was never indicted) testified against them. Rosenberg’s brother quickly turned state’s witness in exchange for reduced charges and a light sentence.

The sentence of death dolled out by the court came as shock to civil libertarians the world round, but alas their campaign for clemency failed. Even J. Edgar Hoover had recommended a lighter sentence.

The Rosenbergs were not only the first civilians ever executed for espionage, they were the first of civilian and military personnel to be executed for espionage during peacetime. Ethel Rosenberg was not even convicted of treason, but “conspiracy to commit espionage.” Technically, the Soviet Union (who the Rosenberg’s alledgedly sold atomic secrets to) and America were still allies as a result of their cooperation in WWII. The couple was executed on June 19, 1953, the day after their 14th wedding anniversary. They were survived by two sons under the age of eleven.

Heh. :smiley:

FTR, this isn’t politically correct bull, IMO. This is the history that I didn’t know very much about until I was 22 years old. When I got just a taste of it, I was hooked. There are so many stories. More of it is being taught in the school, and for that I’m grateful. I hope that trend continues. I’m just doing my part. :slight_smile:

Heh. :smiley:

This isn’t directed at you BlackNGold, it’s just general commentary, in case anyone was wondering why I’m doing this. FTR, this isn’t politically correct bull, IMO. This is the history that I didn’t know very much about until I was 22 years old. When I got just a taste of it, I was hooked. There are so many stories. More of it is being taught in the school, and for that I’m grateful. I hope that trend continues. I’m just doing my part. :slight_smile:

Man, that OP made me hungry.

Get your ass in the kitchen and cook me some dinner, woman. :wink:

BTW, MsRobyn and Airman Doors USAF (and BlackNGold) THANKS for helping keep this thread alive. It’s awfully difficult to get any kind of attention for anything I say at SDMB, even just contributing an opinion. Maybe I’m a dumbass and that’s why…I hope not. :slight_smile:

Anyway, thanks for making me feel less ignored. :slight_smile:

I will, just as soon as you hunt and kill it, dude. :smiley:

Robin

Oh, and presidebt, you’re quite welcome. This thread serves a vital need, and I’ve found it fascinating.

Robin

presidebt, don’tcha mean “Women’s Herstory Month”? :smiley:

:smiley: hehe.

Now that’s poltically correct bull.

Feminist joke #1:

Q: Why is food better than men?
A: Because you don’t have to wait an hour for seconds. :smiley:

Emma Goldman (1869- 1940), Radical At Large
One of history’s more radical women, Emma Goldman was neither born, nor did she die on American soil, but she deserves a place in our history, as her extraordinary life effected so many women and families here, as well as around the world.

Goldman emigrated to America from Russia at the age of 16 in order to escape the practice of arranged marriages that was traditional in the Jewish ghetto where she grew up. After working in the garment industry in Rochester NY for four years, she moved to NYC, where she began a lifelong relationship with Anarchist Alexander Berkman. Four years later, after Berkman was imprisoned, Goldman found herself in jail for speaking out in favor of “food as a right” during the depression of 1893.

Goldman would be jailed time and time again, as every issue she espoused was radical to some element or another. She believed in anarchy, in “free love” and birth control, she did not believe in marriage and discouraged early maternity. She wrote of her opinions in the magazine she published with Berkman, Mother Earth, which enjoyed ten years of publications before WWI. Prior to WWI, America experienced a “political renaissance”, where people were allowed to (and did) discourse on subjects like those advocated by Goldman. Systems of government like communism, socialism, and even anarchy were acceptable topics for average Americans. Discussion of notions we associate with the 1960’s, like free love, birth control, and a strong peace movement were characteristic of the time.

Spending time in the slums of NYC as a midwife gave Goldman an understanding of the importance of birth control. Because of the “second wave” of immigrants at that time, Goldman was performing social work in the slums and saw how devastating birth after yearly birth was taking its toll on poor women. She decided to help in any way she could in educating poor and overburdened mothers on how to avoid pregnancy. Frankly discussing use of the diaphragm with these women was what eventually got her deported, despite the fact that she became a naturalized citizen in the 1880’s. A man by the name of Andrew Comstock was charged with policing the United States regarding the many “morality laws” passed under his name. He was finally successful in having her deported two years after the start of WWI.

“Red Emma” as she was called, with her outspoken ways and refusal to be silenced, left quit a mark in the annals of American Women’s History, though she is little known today.

WHM: Fannie Lou Townsend Hamer (1917-1977)

Despite her childhood in Mississippi, where she was given a scant education and worked from the age of six, Hamer was able to contribute in a leadership position in the civil rights movement of the 60’s. She was also the twentieth child born to her mother.

Still a sharecropper on a plantation in Mississippi, Hamer became politically active in 1962, at the age of 45, when she attended her first civil rights meeting. Her passions were enflamed and she answered the call, going with 17 people to register to vote at the Sunflower County Courthouse. They were stonewalled for the entire business day and their bus was pulled over and their driver arrested on the way home for “driving a bus of the wrong color.” She was subsequently fired from her job as a sharecropper, and she lost her home in the process. She received a $9,000 water bill for a house that had no running water. Her daughter and husband were arrested and she was shot at and threatened when racists targeted her house. She was relentlessly harassed but stood her ground. She got no protection from the police or City Hall, despite repeated requests.

She was later arrested and beaten severely twice, acts which caused her serious nervous and kidney damage. After the first beating, the Justice Department pressed charges against five police officers but the trial was a mockery of American justice and all five were acquitted.

Hamer surprising qualified to run for Congress in 1964, though she was defeated in the Primary. Of the 68% black population in her voting district, estimates put registered voter numbers at 8% because of the obstacles put before black registrants. During that election season she formed the Mississippi Freedom Democratic party with other black self-appointed delegates, and they attended the Democratic National Convention that year, where they protested the whites-only delegation. As speaker for the party, she spoke before the Credentials Committee at the convention.

Fannie Hamer contributed hugely to the civil rights movement that swept through America in the 60’s. In just 14 years, she managed to make an indelible impression on American Women’s history, as well as Black history before she died at the age of 59.

The Famous Five and the Persons Case

On August 27, 1927 five women from Alberta - Emily Murphy, Henrietta Muir Edwards, Louise McKinney, Irene Parlby, and Nellie McClung - petitioned the government of Canada to find whether the word ‘persons’ in section 24 of the British North America Act included women.

The act provided that ‘qualified persons’ be appointed to the Canadian Senate; however, only men had been appointed thus far. For years, pressure had grown for women to be appointed to the Senate. Among other reasons, until 1970 the Senate approved divorces.

The Supreme Court took the matter under consideration on March 14, 1928, and six weeks later ruled that women were not persons under the terms of the Act. Among their preposterous grounds: 1) the framers of the Act, in 1867, could not have had it in mind to permit women senators, since women did not participate in politics at that time; 2) the act used the word “he” to refer to senators.

The Famous Five appealed the case to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom, which at that time was Canada’s court of last resort. On October 18, 1929, the commission ruled unanimously that “the word ‘persons’ in Section 24 includes both the male and female sex” and that the exclusion of women was “a relic of times more barbarous than ours.”

Four months later, Cairine Wilson became the first woman to sit in the Senate.

The École Polytechnique Massacre

On December 6, 1989, a man named Marc Lépine entered the University of Montreal’s École Polytechnique engineering school. He burst into an engineering classroom, and separated the men from the women at gunpoint. He then opened fire on the women.

He continued shooting in other parts of the building. Before he committed suicide, he had killed fourteen women - thirteen students and a secretary.

[ul]
[li]Geneviève Bergeron[/li][li]Hélène Colgan[/li][li]Nathalie Croteau[/li][li]Barbara Daigneault[/li][li]Anne-Marie Edward[/li][li]Maud Haviernick[/li][li]Maryse Laganière[/li][li]Maryse Leclair[/li][li]Anne-Marie Lemay[/li][li]Sonia Pelletier[/li][li]Michèle Richard[/li][li]Annie Saint-Arneault[/li][li]Annie Turcotte[/li][li]Barbara Klucznik Widajewicz[/li][/ul]

His suicide note blamed feminism for the failures in his life, including his failure to get into engineering school – although women made up only 20% of engineering students at that time.

The massacre was a turning point for the Canadian feminist movement and for action against violence against women. December 6 is now the National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women.

The massacre also spurred Canada’s gun control movement; strict gun control legislation was passed in 1998.

First of all, matt_mcl, THANK YOU!! Somebody else cares…

Second of all, I remember when this happened. I had just turned 18. I didn’t realize (or didn’t know) that he blamed feminism for his life failures. Wow. Thanks for sharing this important part of Women’s History; Canadian Women’s History.

Happy International Women’s Day everybody!

presidebt, thank you for your post on Emma Goldman. I was named after her.

I was just talking to my mother about her, and she said she loved the way Emma was so outrageous and in-your-face. She would literally rip the stays off of women so that they could breathe freely. She told women who were content to marry in exchange for security that they were no better than prostitutes. She demanded more from them, because she knew that women were an enormous resource and it grieved her to see their potential remain untapped. The University Of California, Berkeley has been collecting The Emma Goldman Papers since 1980, and now shares them on the web.

You already mentioned that she championed birth control, but did you know that she was a mentor to Margaret Sanger herself? The Emma Goldman Clinic, describes themselves as:

Emma was pro-reproductive choice, pro-gay and pro-worker’s rights. I am honoured to share her name.

You’re welcome. :slight_smile: She has always been (or at least as long as I’ve known about her) been one of my absolute favorites, along with Stanton, The Grimke Sisters and Eliza Pickney. I just love these plucky women.

I knew she and Sanger-Slee knew each other and worked together, but I didn’t know she considered Goldman a mentor. That’s cool.