WMD shipped out of Iraq before and during the WAR!!!!!

From here:

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/breaking_1.html

and

So, they can’t spell “destination”, but Holy cow!!! I can’t believe it!!! The smoking gun!!! Well, maybe not…

From the same article:

Pics from May 2003 and contrasting ones from Feb 2004? Wait, we owned Iraq during that time frame… Not to mention that the components were shipped to Jordan, the Netherlands and Turkey, though Jordan is not our best pal, the other two are definitely our allies.

So, it seems like things that could have been used as WMD components are being scrapped and shipped out of the country for profit as scrap metal.

Fine and dandy, but one thing that really gets my goat is that the article, though it does not really seem to have much in the line of content, allows for a quick reader to assume that actual WMD were shipped out of the country before and during the war.

Over on other forums of conservative bent, this article is being used, by the ultracons and neocons, for two things: One, that Iraq did have WMD and Bush was right to invade and two: that the media is liberal because no one else is reporting it. Not to mention that we should pull out of the UN, again.

So, what pisses me off more, that media outlets write sloppy articles with lots of leeway for reader’s assumptions, almost making the piece an OP, or that people take shoddy reports and wave them around as fact? I don’t know.

But anyway, if any of you have more info about the above UN report or article, please feel free to share.

It seems an article like this pops up every few weeks or months, and the conservative blogs and whatever always blame the “liberal media” for not reporting it.

What I find amusing is that apparently these folks must think the liberal media bias goes all the way up to, and including, the White House. If neither Bush himself nor any of his mouthpieces report this, that’s a hell of powerful liberal media conspiracy!

The article claims that Saddam Hussein shipped weapons after the war against Iraq. Apparently their research relies on the work of fortune tellers.

This story looks like a mutation of the al Samoud 2 missile story from earlier this week.
There was some controversy before the war as to whether these weapons violated UN resolutions, however Saddam agreed to destroy them anyway.
That process was ongoing when Bush invaded. Had the president had a little more patience, all of them would have been destroyed, and they wouldn’t be showing up in scrapyards today.

I don’t know much about “World Tribune”. I went to their site and the one thing that I noticed is that all of their stories state “Exclusive for World Tribute” at the end. Does anyone have any information as to if this is a reliable news organization?

Concerning the story, I find it interesting that the neocons would be celebrating this report. Even if it is correct, which I have high doubts about, and there were WMD, this story only proves that we failed to secure these weapons before they were shipped out and could have fallen into enemy hands.

That makes me feel safe.

This site gives some specifics about the World Tribune, including a list of articles on what they really consider important. This site Gives the publisher’s own view of its mission.

Not to say that a primarily spiritual group couldn’t possibly get news unavailable to (or conspiratorially unpublished by) the likes of the Associated Press, Reuters and the various major newspapers’ and networks’ own correspondents. But I’ll stick to the regular news channels. Even Fox is likely to be more reliable IMO. However, YMMV.

Hmmmm…

Are they trying to be the next Christian Science Monitor?

So…the Buddhists, generally speaking, aren’t pissed off at us. This is good.

No, the Christian Science Monitor is a fairly well-respected publication.

http://newyorker.com/talk/content/?030908ta_talk_mcgrath

Aw, geez, guys. Don’t you remember when we did this last year? Drudge, Limbaugh and others were fooled? by stories from the website(notice, it’s NOT a newspaper). Read the New Yorker article for further insights on who’s who.

Oh yeah, Saddam’s always been a good buddy of Queen Beatrix. We’re stashing away 300 cruise missiles and 40,000 Kurds for him, until he gets out.

WTF???

Is ANYONE taking this shit seriously? I guess the average dumbass could be fooled into thinking that Jordan was a rogue state (even though it’s not), and perhaps the dumbest of all wouldn’t realise that Turkey is well on its way to become an EU-member, and would look mightily foolish stashing away Saddam’s rockets.

But the Netherlands??? We’ve got 2,000 men in Iraq right now because our PM is Bush’s fucking lapdog. Give me fucking break.

I expect better from the average Doper, MrTuffPaws. This article is complete shite.

I don’t think the claim is that these other countries helped Iraq hide WMD. But rather, that Iraq destroyed its WMD equipment, and mixed the remains in with other scrap metal destined for other countries.

This is beyond dispute. Here is the official UNMOVIC report. I quote:

So definitely missile engines were found that show Iraq was in violation of UN resolutions. Anything else?

So we also have undeclared materials that should have been subject to monitoring, but which apparently the UN was unaware that Iraq had. Anything else?

This section suggests that suspected WMD sites may have been looted and the equipment dismantled and sold before the U.S. could find them. But it’s hard to tell exactly.

Anyway, it’s an interesting document.

Desperate Bush-lovin’ Republicans, it seems like.

Coldfire:

???

I called bullshit first, and I am better than average :wink:

It should be worth mentioning that the Soka Gakkai is a less reputable organisation from a Wiki article:

That’s an understatement.

I believe they’ve been designated as a cult in France. Seriously, under their veneer of peace’n love, they’re scary people.

Dammit, that should read:

It should be worth mentioning that the Soka Gakkai is a less than reputable organisation.

Somebody tried to pass this off as a serious story on another website I frequent. It was about the least challenging article to rip to shreds…

What’s really fun is to compare the World Tribune rightwing crapaganda with the same story in the New York Times. Note the lack of references to Saddam or the claim that the Iraqi government shipped anything anywhere (as that article mentions, the Times did a piece about this last month and they actually spoke to some of the people who are coming into Iraq from other countries and stealing this metal to sell it elsewhere), or the claim that what was shipped were WMD, since they weren’t. What a crock.

I can only assume they hope to dupe dimwitted readers into believing Saddam has sold WMDs to the Netherworld, so that they can then accuse anyone who doesn’t like Bush of not only supporting terrorists, but Satan himself.

Aw, c’mon, Coldfire. We all know you Dutch boys got legalized dope and hookers over there, and if that don’t make you part of the Axis of Evil, what would?

For some reason, conspiracy theorists periodically include Queen Beatrix as one of their alleged secret manipulators of current events. Don’t ask me why.

The NYT story isn’t the first time stories have appeared in the news about weapons-related stuff getting smuggled out of Iraq during the US occupation. Apparently we have met the enemy, and he is us.

Of course, that’s been true in all sorts of ways lately.