From here:
http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/breaking_1.html
and
So, they can’t spell “destination”, but Holy cow!!! I can’t believe it!!! The smoking gun!!! Well, maybe not…
From the same article:
Pics from May 2003 and contrasting ones from Feb 2004? Wait, we owned Iraq during that time frame… Not to mention that the components were shipped to Jordan, the Netherlands and Turkey, though Jordan is not our best pal, the other two are definitely our allies.
So, it seems like things that could have been used as WMD components are being scrapped and shipped out of the country for profit as scrap metal.
Fine and dandy, but one thing that really gets my goat is that the article, though it does not really seem to have much in the line of content, allows for a quick reader to assume that actual WMD were shipped out of the country before and during the war.
Over on other forums of conservative bent, this article is being used, by the ultracons and neocons, for two things: One, that Iraq did have WMD and Bush was right to invade and two: that the media is liberal because no one else is reporting it. Not to mention that we should pull out of the UN, again.
So, what pisses me off more, that media outlets write sloppy articles with lots of leeway for reader’s assumptions, almost making the piece an OP, or that people take shoddy reports and wave them around as fact? I don’t know.
But anyway, if any of you have more info about the above UN report or article, please feel free to share.