Generally speaking, I’m good at picking up on patterns. For example last month I rolled over from one project to another 3 weeks after others did, and all awhile I was on the previous project people moaned for that the computers kept doing “random” things; within 3 or 4 days of being on that project I was able to explain to everyone what caused each of the “random” problems. (then I had to write a report for my boss because people still didn’t understand why things were happening!)
Patterns with people, on the other hand, I’m not as good at picking out. I think I’ve discovered one now, but it’s not easy to believe…
Half of my job involves supervising groups of 8 to 10 people for 2 to 6 weeks, depending on the length of the contract (after that people are reassigned to new projects, usually with a different supervisor). I train them, monitor their work to make sure that they’re adhering to project standards set by various state DOEs, and answer questions that these 8 to 10 people have when they run into trouble assessing a particular writing sample – usually this involves going to them and reading the sample with them and discussing what score it ought to be.
And it’s finally occurred to me, after doing this for a few months, that the people with the most problems are always 20-something guys. Odd, isn’t it?
At first I thought well maybe it’s because younger scorers are less experienced and have less confidence. But the new scorers who are women of any age or older men seem to not have problems as often. Hmm. Maybe they’re just less mature than the 20-something girls, since they say that males mature slower anyway.
For a while I just thought it was strange, until a couple of weeks ago when it dawned on me that one of my former “problem scorers” was flirtatious once he was assigned to a new group. (I don’t pick up on flirting very well until it’s overt, unfortunately)
So eventually a strange theory occurred to me – is it remotely possible that these scorers who need so much help are just playing dumb to get my attention? That seems awfully bold to me, but it’s happened a few times already so I’m beginning to wonder…
If it were the case I don’t think it’s something to be upset about so much as surprised by. I do realize that although I consider my looks to be average, some people don’t – so I’ve learned through catty remarks from other women who complain I don’t even care that guys look at me. Truthfully, it’s more that I don’t often notice. I’ve been stared at my whole life because of my hair color, so I learned to tune it out for the most part, else I’d still be uncomfortable for feeling noticed all the time.
So guys, do you think I’m seeing a pattern where none exists, or would a guy really play dumb to get the attention of a female supervisor?