Could Jennifer Love Hewitt get acting work if she wasn't a busty hottie?

Just curious. Is she talented enough to get acting jobs or music contracts (music contracts?) without her tight little body paying the freight?

Here she is -

Jennifer Love Hewitt

Banned Levis ad: http: // www. ryoni. com/news/123/ARTICLE/1486/2005-08-21.html (broadband only)


Moderator interjects: I have disabled the link, which is not workplace-safe. If you want to go to that link, delete the spaces. We’re not trying to censor links, we just don’t want anyone getting into trouble by accidentally clicking on it at their workplace. --CKDH

I don’t even find her that attractive. Waaaaay too skinny for me – she looks like a lollypop with boobs.

In TV Guide, she was celebrating that she was able to play an “adult” role without having to take off all of her clothes.

I said to myself, “Er … yay?”

She should, after all the sacrifices she made leaving her Eskimo village all by herself and all…

Yeahh, she’s not that hot, IMO.

And why was the ad banned? Because of her breasts?

More the bouncy package than the breasts exclusively I think

This one was also banned, but it wasn’t for breasteses, but rather for whiskers.

In all fairness, they are a simply terrific set of boobs.

Short answer, yes. Here’s my logic.

JLH = minimal acting talent, great boobies, gets plenty of work.

Nicole Kidman = minimal acting talent, not especially great boobies, gets plenty of work.

So if JLH suddenly lost the world class boobies, the “Kidman Factor” would still see her get plenty of work. And possibly an Academy Award.
mm

Huh?

I have only seen her in two film roles, The Tuxedo and Heartbreakers.

As a sterotypical gorgeous Bond-girl scientist, she beats out all the competition that I know, including Nicole Kidman’s performance in **The Peacemaker in terms of coming across as a person whose obvious onscreen intelligence doesn’t negate her supposed occupation as an respectable scientist. (Though I will give Kidman credit for giving, perhaps, the best performance of a sterotypical dumb blonde that I have probably ever seen–though I’ll be damned if I can guess why she did it.)

In the Heartbreakers she came across perfectly as a young teen with rivalry issues with her mom.

Given that I didn’t even realise it was the same person who had given both of these performances until much later, I would say that she’s really not that bad as an actor.

And I likes me women boney, so if y’all don’t like her, that’s just more for me. So, “Dibs”

Hello! Those links are NOT safe for work (I just found out the hard way).

Yeah, me too. Ouch.

a pun?

I wish it was a pun. Unfortunately, I don’t become aroused at “access denied; inappropriate content” pages.

[sub]Could Jennifer Love Hewitt get acting work if she wasn’t a busty hottie?[/sub]

From the link in the OP:

*At age 5, she was taking tap, jazz, and ballet lessons which led her to joining the Texas Show Team, which toured the Soviet Union and Europe.

At age 10, the family moved to L.A. with the encouragement of talent scouts,

Love quickly found commercial work and a role on Disney’s “Kids Incorporated”.*

Looks like she had way above average talent before she got the boobs.

And yeah, very, very attractive.

Not so fast! I’ll flip ya’ for her. Two out of three?

I’m sorry … what were you saying? My brain stopped working after it came across the term “busty hottie.”

:confused: Neither site features any nudity. I checked before linking.

I made it all the way to tight little body.

True, but I had three adds surrounding the screen offering me a chance to find sex partners while clicking here.

My employer is fairly laid back about us using the net, but If we’re going to order anything online, I think they’d prefer it was something from Land’s End.