“As far as being in charge of a ceremony, I can handle that. I’ve run meetings, and spoken before a group of unhappy union members. I’ve never married anybody, though. Does the minister share responsibility if it doesn’t work out? I sure hope not.”
Since you haven’t received too many responses to this question I’ll give you one. Ultimately no, you aren’t responsible for the subsequent actions of the couple you marry – people make their own decisions and sometimes mess up their own lives. Having said this, though, I’ll also say that if you do perform their marriage and if they do end up having a bad split, you will likely find yourself wondering if the favor you tried to do them was worth it.
It’s been almost 20 years since I performed my first wedding ceremony and the first few I performed were done primarily because I wanted to be a nice guy to the people who asked me. A number of those early weddings (including my wife’s brother’s) ended in horribly messy divorces, and as I watched some of those marriages dissolve I had to admit to myself that I had a sense that all was not well with some of those couples even before they were married. That led me to a serious reassessment of the conditions under which I would consent to marry a couple. I stopped worrying so much about giving a couple what they wanted and started being pretty selective about couples I’d work with. It’s caused some hurt feelings and awkward meetings, but now at least I can perform those ceremonies that do meet my requirements without the worry that I’m making a bad situation worse.
Now when I’m approached by a couple wanting to marry, no matter if they are strangers to me or the children of good friends, the first thing I do is give them a copy of what my secretary calls my “scary letter.” It clearly describes the requirements I have for pre-marital counseling and emphasizes that I will not commit to their service until they have completed most of the requirements. I’d guess that the requirements scare away about a third of the couples, but its allowed me to perform the rest of the services with a quieter conscience.
It doesn’t sound to me as if you are planning on doing a great many weddings, so I wouldn’t think that you need to codify your conditions quite so formally, but I would suggest you keep a few things in mind: First, remember that no matter how lightly the couple seems to be taking their arrangements, when all is said and done they will be legally married. I’ve known couples who have had non-traditional ceremonies (one on a roller coaster comes to mind) with the unstated understanding that such a service somehow made their whole marriage less formal. Not facually the case, true, but if I were you I’d sound them out on this. Are they asking you because they think that having you perform the service makes it somehow less binding than if it were performed by a JP? If you think this is the case, you need to set them straight on this.
Second, you really need to look at the couple as objectively as you can and ask yourself if you are really doing these people a favor by marrying them. Do you have a sense that their marriage will last? If not, DON’T do it. This is personal experience speaking. I married my brother-in-law to his wife in spite of misgivings because they were pregnant and my in-laws wanted their grandchild to be born to married parents. The marriage dissolved messily five years later and now my wife and I are raising the children of that relationship. It’s true that if you say you won’t perform the marriage you may hurt some feelings, but that’s preferable to aiding and abetting a train wreck.
All this having been said, I hope the arrangements work out for you. Not having a problem with public speaking is a big advantage, but be prepared anyway. For some reason, when I perform a wedding I seem to be prone to spoonerisms. Think of the priest in Four Weddings and a Funeral but without all the fumbling with the little hat. I hope you’ll post and let us know how it went.
Curate