So…we’re in the middle of busting a plot “intended to be mass murder on an unimaginable scale” and we’re going public with what amounts to an official warning to the blokes involved with the plot? And we’re announcing what we’re doing to thwart further attempts?
OK, I know this is Pit-bound, but until then this is a POLL:
I was thinking about this, and my opinion is that I’ll reserve judgement until we actually see some confiscated explosives. Then I’ll believe it was for real.
The timing seems especially convenient, with mid-terms just around the corner, and with the Connecticut results suggesting a voter migration towards anti-war.
I suspect that there really was a terror plot, and some serious arm-twisting by the pubelickins to have Britain agree to allow this to become public, now.
The impression I got from the news reports is that the British police have been monitoring this group for some time, and decided that it was now time to stop monitoring and start arresting, since the plans were getting close to being accomplished.
I do not think this is a bogus announcement of a nonexistent plan.
However, I do think that (a) it’s remarkable how quickly American authorities got themselves out in front of the event in order to associate themselves with and thereby ambiguously claim credit for what is essentially a British operation, and (b) the public handling of this event totally gives the lie to the wink-wink “there’s lots of stuff going on behind the scenes we can’t tell you about” attitude the administration has been using to beat the fear-drum over the last couple of years. This pretty much proves, for me, that if there really were multiple threats and multiple plots being thwarted, we would have heard about them at the time.
Other than those legitimate political considerations, no, not bogus.
There seems to be little to doubt that the british authorities rooted out a potential plot and the players involved. Good for them if that’s the case.
That it may have had spill over effect into the US is believable too.
But the resultant media buzz and the airports on Red Alert is probably a fair mix of prudent caution and the usual administration party line…“It’s an A/Q plot. Something must be done! We’re doing something. Therefore we’re doing the right thing.”
I believe it’s the real deal (the announcement caused the London markets to tank. I don’t think they’d bullshit us knowing what kind of effect this sort of thing has on $$$).
Actually, this one seems legitimate. I would like some concrete details, though. Like samples of confiscated explosives, names of conspirators, evidence that they were to fly on the same day, etc.
I agree. However, there’s the ‘why today instead of a day or two ago’ question. Oh, yeah, right. It would have looked too convenient on U.S. midterm primaries day. But wait too long and you miss the double bump of a drop in oil prices (due to an anticipated short-term decline in the demand for jet fuel) and an oooh-tough-on-terrorists stance/photo op.
I’m especially disturbed that, even though investigations and arrests are ongoing, air traffic esp. in the UK and outbound from the UK wasn’t just suspended. If it made sense to suspend air travel in the U.S. for three days after 9/11, then it makes sense to me to put everything on hold while the sorting out process gets, you know, sorted out this time around.
The dollar is up on the news – or was the alst time I looked. The pound is down, ut not hugely. This morning on MSNBC, they had a graphic showing how the American markets tend to drop (independent of currency valuation) on the day of terrorist news, but bounce up on the next trading day. Today, the U.S. markets are up slightly at the moment, and look like they will at least hold steady through the day, barring some new traumatic details or something. The closing of the
Alaskan pipeline was more collectively upsetting to the markets.
And, yeah, Inigo, anyone who thinks ridiculous amounts of money can’t be made on a tanking market is forgetting about the “buy low” half of ye olde formula for simplistic success.