Can we all agree that “repeating back the other guy’s opinion with bad grammar and spelling, typos, AOL-style acronyms, the non-word ‘teh’, and 11’s in place of exclamation points” is an ineffective argument, and too trite to be funny? Thanks.
[QUOTE=Walter Windchill]
Goddamn French judges.
[/QUOTE]
Now Now Walter, it’s not that I’m hard on you because I don’t believe in you - in fact quite the contrary, I’m hard on you precisely because I do believe in you. I know your next rant will be a significant improvement. Shoot for a 2 or 3.
I think it’s about as cute as the inevitable “why do you hate America?” that pops up in every anti-Bush thread. I don’t think we’re going to see the end of either any time soon.
This is a small part of why I stopped visiting the WoW forums–in addition you get rampant ASCII art (at least until they cracked down on it), every stupid cliche known to man (and a few known to orcs), and, my personal un-favorite, mis-quoting someone and adding the words ‘Fixed it for you’. Most of these ‘jokes’ weren’t funny when they started.
[QUOTE=elucidator]
Sure you want to ban OMG! First, they take God out of our schools, then out of the pledge, and then…the acronyms! They’ll stop at nothing!
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Clothahump]
Nah. The acronym is incorrect. It should be OMFG.
[/QUOTE]
I have not seen OMFG in several years. The last I remember seeing it is shortly before I first observed the appearance of ZOMG. It was my understanding, since I see ZOMG being used as a more “intense” version of OMG, that ZOMG had simply usurped OMFG in popular usage. Or, is there some finer nuance between the two onto which I have not yet caught?