The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-09-2007, 06:15 PM
Carnick Carnick is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Why is swelling bad?

It's common practice to throw ice on a injury in order to reduce swelling. Why does swelling need to be removed? Isn't your body doing it for a reason?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 05-09-2007, 06:29 PM
WhyNot WhyNot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sweet Home Chicago
Posts: 30,289
Like almost anything the body does, it can be good or bad, depending on how much.

Yes, swelling is a sign that good things are happening - the body is sending extra blood and lymph and immune system stuff the the site. It's also gently immobilizing the site a bit so you don't accidentally move it around too much and risk further injury.

OTOH, too much swelling hurts. Things start to press on nerves and we don't like that much. We also have more friendly ways to immobilize things nowadays, like restraints and splints if need be. There's also a point at which too much swelling can cause tissue damage and slow down healing, and the body isn't a thinking machine (well, not like that, anyway) and doesn't always know when that point is.

If you have an injury with significant swelling, you're not going to be able to reduce it completely with an ice pack, nor is that the goal. The goal is to reduce the swelling enough to reduce the pain.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-09-2007, 06:35 PM
Carnick Carnick is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
I see. So is there no danger in reducing swelling? We're not impeding the body's natural healing process?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-09-2007, 06:44 PM
Harmonious Discord Harmonious Discord is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Having had unremittent swelling for a long time over my whole body, I can say it feels like every part has fallen asleep and fells like when the parts are just getting circulation back. You're also unable to bend the swollen apendage. Inpared circulation from swelling also precipitates never damage. I still have terrible coordination, and walk like a drunk or half drunk now.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-09-2007, 06:51 PM
WhyNot WhyNot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sweet Home Chicago
Posts: 30,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carnick
I see. So is there no danger in reducing swelling? We're not impeding the body's natural healing process?
Well, I never say never, but I run with the hippies, and even the most frighteningly anti-medical establishment stuff says to ice an injury to reduce swelling. Like I said, I don't think it's even possible to eliminate swelling with ice - when I sprained my ankle, it looked like a balloon even with lots of ice - but it's possible to reduce it for comfort and to help prevent nerve and tissue damage. Note: ice should always be applied in a cloth, not directly, and for no more than 20 minutes at a time, to reduce the chances of frostbite from the ice.

Remember that the body doesn't always do what's best for us as individuals. It does what works well enough most of the time for enough of us to breed. "Innate healing wisdom" is nice and all, but we also evolved brains to help us help ourselves.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-10-2007, 03:07 AM
NBYodo NBYodo is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
At my recent emerg first aid course, they said that new resarch had found that icing injuries does reduce swelling and pain, but ultimately does the injury more harm that good since icing reduces the blood flow to the area and impedes healing. No cites, but they said it's common in sports players to have internal scarring due to over-icing their injuries so they could get back into the game.

The instructor said that the coldest compress should only be lukewarm, and swelling and pain is best fought with drugs.

NB
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-10-2007, 07:45 AM
Keeve Keeve is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by NBYodo
they said it's common in sports players to have internal scarring due to over-icing their injuries so they could get back into the game.
Whoa! IANAdoctor, but I smell some very poor logic here. Maybe the scarring is not from the anti-swelling procedures, but from getting back into the game before the injury has healed?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-10-2007, 07:51 AM
Telemark Telemark is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Hub of the sports world
Posts: 14,848
Quote:
Originally Posted by NBYodo
The instructor said that the coldest compress should only be lukewarm, and swelling and pain is best fought with drugs.
Hrmm, that's not what my instructor said. Cold (in the form of ice or cold water) was the first choice. Drugs can have unintended side effects.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-10-2007, 08:01 AM
Qadgop the Mercotan Qadgop the Mercotan is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Slithering on the hull
Posts: 22,281
Too much swelling is bad. Not enough swelling is bad. The challenge is in figuring out how much is right, and then attaining that goal.

The body's defenses have a tendency to over-react. Often, the immune response to a significant infection can be so over-the-top that the patient dies of the defenses, not the infection. With injuries, the body rushes many factors to the site which can cause similar problems locally.

If one elevates the injured area higher than their heart, uses an elastic wrap firmly but not too tight, keeps ice on it no more than 20 minutes out of every hour, and takes some tylenol, one will be more likely to achieve a happy medium between too much swelling and not enough swelling.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-10-2007, 12:18 PM
KarlGauss KarlGauss is offline
Out of the slimy mud of words
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Between pole and tropic
Posts: 6,866
Somewhat off topic, but the question you pose is quite reminiscent of another, related one - should we try to reduce fever or should we respect the "wisdom of the body" and leave it alone? Despite lots of arguments both ways, there is no consensus (except basically what Qad said, i.e. try to find the happy medium).
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-10-2007, 12:40 PM
Musicat Musicat is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sturgeon Bay, WI USA
Posts: 17,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlGauss
...there is no consensus (except basically what Qad said, i.e. try to find the happy medium).
Find me a happy medium, and I'll find you a laughing witch.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-10-2007, 01:19 PM
WhyNot WhyNot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sweet Home Chicago
Posts: 30,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Musicat
Find me a happy medium, and I'll find you a laughing witch.
Hey, I resemble that remark!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-10-2007, 09:04 PM
DesertDog DesertDog is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mesa, Ariz.
Posts: 2,350
The way I was taught was to ice an injury immediately after for about two hours to reduce the swelling, then warmth after that to increase circulation. RICE:

Rest
Ice
Compression
Elevation

I never got to put that into practice so I can't tell you how effective it is.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-10-2007, 10:27 PM
Scubaqueen Scubaqueen is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by DesertDog
The way I was taught was to ice an injury immediately after for about two hours to reduce the swelling, then warmth after that to increase circulation. RICE:

Rest
Ice
Compression
Elevation
and just today i was told that for my torn lateral meniscus (no surgery, thank the gods), it was rehab, rest, ice, elevation, but no more than 20 minutes of ice at a time.

it definitely depends on what kind of injury - and where - we're talking about, here.

Last edited by Scubaqueen; 05-10-2007 at 10:28 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-10-2007, 11:02 PM
Miss Woodhouse Miss Woodhouse is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
My PTA husband says to alternate heat with ice after the injury has started healing. The heat increases circulation and the ice reduces swelling.

it seems to work well for us. His favorite ice bag is a bag of frozen peas.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-11-2007, 07:59 AM
Gleena Gleena is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Compartment Syndrome is what they taught us in my first responder class as being Very Bad Swelling.

Apparently, a doctor might actually cut the skin to alleviate swelling in this instance. And actual doctor may be along shortly (or not) to tell me I'm full of it.

Cheers,
G
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-11-2007, 08:44 AM
kanicbird kanicbird is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 1999
You may want to take a peek at prolotherapy where you intentionally cause inflammation to help healing.

Quote:
The Injected solution causes the body to heal itself through the process of inflammation and repair.
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proloth...nical_practice
Reply With Quote
Reply



Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.