I’ll offer my pick; whether or not it pairs with your Thanksgiving dinner is between you and your palate.
Okay, it’s time to rack up a few frequent flyer miles. After our trip to Australia a few weeks ago, and then jetting off to Chile, I have decided that the Southern Hemisphere is the place to be this time of year. Therefore, we return to Oz. We’re off to see the Shiraz…
My pick: Peter Lehmann’s Barossa Shiraz
There is a story (perhaps it is apocryphal) that during the white-wine scare of the ‘80s the Australian government wanted vineyards to rip out old growth red grapes and replace them with white. Lehmann convinced many of the vineyards to keep their vines, and so we have him to thank for Australian Shiraz. For that alone I would probably buy his wine, but thankfully there are other reasons.
In my opinion, this sets the standard for everything I want in a shiraz. It certainly isn’t the best shiraz out there; it isn’t even the best that I have had. But it is a very good wine, an everyday quaff that I would consider a “good all around wine”. I’ll drink it myself at home, and I have no problem bringing it with me when invited for dinner. I also noticed once at a get-together that it was a wine that inspired a bit of greediness. Conversation was getting animated, and people were almost grabbing the bottle from each other to pour another glass. Maybe it was just one of those parties, though…
I like the look in the glass, deep and dark. The bouquet is fruity (okay, I don’t have a great sense of smell). The tannins don’t overpower, and the aftertaste is distinctly shiraz (which is a very good thing to my mind).
My only problem here: I buy this for about $13 or $14 locally, and even cheaper if it is on sale (which isn’t very often). I know that a lot of you buy through Bevmo, and they list it for $20. As much as I like this wine, I’d think twice about paying that sort of money. If you can get it for $15 or under, I would recommend this wine. If not, I offer:
My alternate pick: Jacob’s Creek Reserve Shiraz
While I don’t favor this as much as the Lehmann, I do think that it fits its price very well. I wish that I could say that I discovered this all by myself, but I had a bit of help. Wine Spectator had the 2003 vintage in their Top 100 Exciting Wines of 2006; it clocked in at #64.
From the little I know, it isn’t that this is a better wine than the following 35 wines on the list. Penfolds RWT came in after this pick, for example. I think that it has more to do with the QPR (Quality/Price Ratio) which made this one a bargain at the list price of $13. And I can usually find it for $10 or less (which is where Bevmo has it), which just makes things better. I don’t think that this has quite the quality of the Lehmann, but it’s a darn good wine for the price.
Jacob’s Creek is one of the labels that seems to make a lot of good wine for a good price, with one stipulation: Look for the word “Reserve” on the label. It only tacks a few dollars to the price, but the non-Reserve wines are ordinary at best. They make a nice Cabernet, Chardonnay and Riesling (the dry steely type) at a reasonable price, but again: Look for Reserve on the label.
A note about vintages, both for the Lehmann and for the Jacob’s Creek: The Wine Spectator listed the 2003 Jacob’s Creek vintage in their list. Having had both the 2003 and the 2004 of that wine, I can say that I preferred the 2003. I had them both within a few weeks of each other, so it might have just been the extra year in the bottle. I found the same with the Peter Lehmann. It isn’t all that likely that you’ll find any 2003 of either wine on the shelf, but if you do I’d recommend going for that one. And now I see that the websites are listing the 2005 although I haven’t seen it on the shelf yet.
And as an alternate alternate pick: Jim Barry “The Lodge Hill” Shiraz
The first two wines were from the Barossa Valley, and I think that they had a lot in common. This one is from Clare Valley, and to me it has a different character. However, a lot of variables changed other than region, not the least of which is that I could only find a 2005 vintage. I wish that I had been turned on to this one early enough to compare with the same vintage as the first two. I find this a tad lighter, and a bit more acidic. If the others are a bit too heavy for you, this might be what you are looking for in a Shiraz. My thought is that this might be a bit more compatible with your Thanksgiving bird than the first two, but it can be difficult to find.
Cheers.
And now that I’ve made a Australian toast, someone is going to want to spread Vegemite on it…