The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-27-2008, 09:23 AM
sciurophobic sciurophobic is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Differences among child molesters

Why are some molesters of the "friendly" priest/coach/teacher variety while others are of the scary "kidnap children off the street and dump the body" type? Are the two groups distinct, or are there molesters who find their victims both ways?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 02-27-2008, 10:08 AM
Si Amigo Si Amigo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North of 8 Mile
Posts: 2,338
IANACM but I would imagine that they derive there perverse pleasures from different aspects of controlling there victums. One enjoys building up a trusting relationship and getting the victum to buy into the situtation, thus prolonging the relationship. The other just enjoys to take by force and destroying all evidance of there crime (ie, the victum).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-27-2008, 10:09 AM
KneadToKnow KneadToKnow is offline
Voodoo Adult (Slight Return)
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Posts: 20,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Si Amigo
IANACM
Best IANA ever.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-27-2008, 10:28 AM
Polycarp Polycarp is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A better place to be
Posts: 26,705
I confess to having a sick enough sense of humor to have been amused by Si Amigo's disclaimer "IANACM."

From what little I've seen of pedophiles' writings (and I am aware that pedophile =/= CM, but there is certainly enough overlap to generalize from there), there appear to be five groups:

1. Those for whom sex with kids is a manifestation of dominance.
2. Psychopaths whose sole interest is in their own pleasure, with no thought of what the act will do to the kid.
3. Those with a romantic-love attitude towards the child -- which may be reciprocated! While one may deplore their perverse psyches, I think it needs to be recognized that, in their own mind at least, they mean no harm towards the child but rather a physical expression of a sincerely-felt if misguided love.
4. Those attracted to children who are ethical and "socially sane" enough to realize the potential psychological harm to the child, and who refrain from sexual contact.
5. A bizarre group of aesthetes, who claim to have a "pure appreciation of the beauty of naked children" -- but who are probably so deep in denial that they need to worry about the riverine crocodiles.

The "kidnap and kill" types are clearly from the first two groups. I suspect the family-member-molester and family-friend types are relatively evenly distributed among the first three groups.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-27-2008, 10:46 AM
Anne Neville Anne Neville is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 11,583
Pedophiles presumably differ in their levels of social skills, just like everybody else. Maybe the scary "kidnap kids off the streets" ones are the ones that don't have the social skills to become coaches, priests, or teachers, or who don't have the social skills to "groom" their victims.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.