The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Mundane Pointless Stuff I Must Share (MPSIMS)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-24-2008, 08:30 PM
Siam Sam Siam Sam is offline
Elephant Whisperer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 20,705
The Burj Dubai: Earthquake Generator?

The Burj Dubai is a skyscraper being built in the UAE. Upon completion next year, it will be the tallest manmade structure in the world. (May already be, depending on how far along construction is.)

The Taipei 101 in Taiwan is the previous tallest structure. Apparently, the weight of that building has resulted in increased seismic activity in the ground beneath it. See here and here.

I don't have a cite for it, but I've been told that because of the Taipei 101 seismic activity, there's a question about what effect the Burj Dubai will have.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 05-24-2008, 10:18 PM
Xema Xema is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siam Sam
Upon completion next year, it will be the tallest manmade structure in the world. (May already be, depending on how far along construction is.)
The Wiki article says it became the tallest structure on April 7, when it surpassed the height of a TV mast in North Dakota.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-24-2008, 10:56 PM
Marley23 Marley23 is offline
Administerminator
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 68,730
I think this would be an interesting topic for Cecil or the staff.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-24-2008, 11:35 PM
Jeeves Jeeves is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
One thing that was stressed by a couple of different professors I had was that large reservoirs will cause increased seismic activity, so you have to be extra careful in finding as many faults as possible when designing dams. They also used the Three Gorges Dam as a place where the earthquakes result in inland tsunamis. I can certainly imagine that any small faults located very near the Burj Dubai may have increased activity due to the increased weight. There is still a massive amount of information we don't know about earthquakes, hell anything subsurface.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-25-2008, 09:43 AM
Siam Sam Siam Sam is offline
Elephant Whisperer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 20,705
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marley23
I think this would be an interesting topic for Cecil or the staff.
Just dashed a note off to the relevant e-mail address. We'll see if anything develops. Thanks for the suggestion.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-26-2008, 09:41 PM
Siam Sam Siam Sam is offline
Elephant Whisperer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 20,705
Updates on the Burj Dubai's construction and more can be found here.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-27-2008, 03:04 AM
matt matt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A Brit in 'Stralia
Posts: 1,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeeves
One thing that was stressed by a couple of different professors I had was that large reservoirs will cause increased seismic activity, so you have to be extra careful in finding as many faults as possible when designing dams.
Are you telling me that the plot of View to a Kill has a basis in fact? You really could make an earthquake by pumping seawater into faulted rock, and setting off a kiloton or so of ANFO? 'Cos that would be pretty cool.

Last edited by matt; 05-27-2008 at 03:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-27-2008, 08:44 AM
Really Not All That Bright Really Not All That Bright is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
Dubai is a good thousand miles or so from the Arabian-Indian plate boundary. Isn't that far enough to make significant earthquakes pretty unlikely?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-27-2008, 09:13 AM
lieu lieu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Bedrock
Posts: 23,351
I don't doubt that skyscrapers can be built to specs that exceed the ability of their foundations and local strata to provide them adequate support. That some shallow straining and shifting of the ground just beneath would occur comes as no surprise.

But my guess is that the weight of even the heaviest buildings, either gross or tons per foot, would absolutely pale in comparison to that of the crust beneath them and they'd have no effect on movement along those fault systems responsible for the generation of earthquakes.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-27-2008, 11:56 AM
Zebra Zebra is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: LIC
Posts: 19,299
But what if the Taipei 101 jumped off a chair? and shouted?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-27-2008, 02:36 PM
Colophon Colophon is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siam Sam
Updates on the Burj Dubai's construction and more can be found here.
And really obsessive skyscraper geekiness and constant photo updates here.

(Link currently points to last page of 374-page thread. And I think that's the 28th thread or something stupid.)

It really is just quite ridiculously, insanely, ludicrously tall, and there are still several hundred feet of spire to go. It's tall.

I have to see this thing in the flesh one day.

Last edited by Colophon; 05-27-2008 at 02:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-27-2008, 03:29 PM
lieu lieu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Bedrock
Posts: 23,351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colophon
I have to see this thing in the flesh one day.
I suspect that would look like a boner.

Last edited by lieu; 05-27-2008 at 03:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:14 PM
Siam Sam Siam Sam is offline
Elephant Whisperer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 20,705
Quote:
Originally Posted by Really Not All That Bright
Dubai is a good thousand miles or so from the Arabian-Indian plate boundary. Isn't that far enough to make significant earthquakes pretty unlikely?
I believe at least one fault beneath the Taipei 101 was unknown before. Maybe the Burj Dubai will find some?

As for the weight of the Earth's crust, maybe that's spread out more? That of the Burj Dubai and Taipei 101 is more concentrated. Similar to an elephant's foot exerting less pressure per square inch than a deer's.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-18-2008, 11:38 PM
Siam Sam Siam Sam is offline
Elephant Whisperer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 20,705
There are some great new photos of the Burj Dubai here, here and here.

And again, the skyscaper's website is here.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-19-2008, 08:28 AM
Hampshire Hampshire is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,825
I wonder how much man made weight the island of Manhattan holds?
Buildings, pavements, subways, sewers, people, cars, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-10-2008, 12:00 AM
Siam Sam Siam Sam is offline
Elephant Whisperer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 20,705
This is amazing, but even as the Burj Dubai, which will be the world's tallest building, nears completion, Dubai has announced plans to construct an even taller building! It will tower more than 1 kilometer into the air. Story here.

Excerpt: "With its world's tallest building nearing completion, Dubai said today it is embarking on an even more ambitious skyscraper: one that will soar more than 1 km into the air. That's the height of more than 10 American football fields, 13 Airbus A380 superjumbo jets or three of New York's Chrysler Buildings stacked end-to-end."
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-10-2008, 12:23 AM
friedo friedo is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 19,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt View Post
Are you telling me that the plot of View to a Kill has a basis in fact? You really could make an earthquake by pumping seawater into faulted rock, and setting off a kiloton or so of ANFO? 'Cos that would be pretty cool.
I don't know about that, but the filling of Lake Mead (the largish pond behind the Hoover Dam) causes a few small earthquakes in the surrounding area as the weight of the water screwed with the tectonic plates.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-28-2008, 09:26 PM
Siam Sam Siam Sam is offline
Elephant Whisperer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 20,705
And now we see that the stalled property market in Dubai will not derail plans for this new tallest building, according to the master developer, Nakheel. Story here.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-29-2008, 02:26 AM
Jaglavak Jaglavak is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Really Not All That Bright View Post
Dubai is a good thousand miles or so from the Arabian-Indian plate boundary. Isn't that far enough to make significant earthquakes pretty unlikely?
Bingo. Taiwan is on the ring of fire. Dubai isn't close to a major plate boundary. I seriously doubt if it will cause an earthquake. (Unless it holds it breath until it turns blue, in which case all bets are off.)

Hanging some numbers on it, the Wiki article estimates the completed weight of the tower at around 922,000 tons. That is about 1.1 million cubic yards of water, or roughly equivalent to a reservoir about 30 yards deep by 215 yards in diameter. The Three Gorges reservoir contains about 51 billion cubic yards of water spread over 244 square miles. A whole different league.

I think the whole thing is kinda funny. Architects get all damp and fluttery over it, but from a money and utility angle it just doesn't pencil out. Rather odd and very Freudian.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-29-2008, 02:36 AM
Cisco Cisco is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siam Sam View Post
This is amazing, but even as the Burj Dubai, which will be the world's tallest building, nears completion, Dubai has announced plans to construct an even taller building! It will tower more than 1 kilometer into the air. Story here.

Excerpt: "With its world's tallest building nearing completion, Dubai said today it is embarking on an even more ambitious skyscraper: one that will soar more than 1 km into the air. That's the height of more than 10 American football fields, 13 Airbus A380 superjumbo jets or three of New York's Chrysler Buildings stacked end-to-end."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaglavak View Post
I think the whole thing is kinda funny. Architects get all damp and fluttery over it, but from a money and utility angle it just doesn't pencil out. Rather odd and very Freudian.
Very, if you ask me. What is their obsession with absurdly giant buildings now? After 9/11, anything taller than a Motel-6 is a target as far as I'm concerned. People will spend their lives obsessing about how to bring these buildings down.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-29-2008, 08:38 AM
Siam Sam Siam Sam is offline
Elephant Whisperer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 20,705
I vote they should name the new tower Babel.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-29-2008, 09:51 AM
Chefguy Chefguy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 24,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siam Sam View Post
I vote they should name the new tower Babel.
Or maybe "Johnson".
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-29-2008, 05:26 PM
Jaglavak Jaglavak is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chefguy View Post
Or maybe "Johnson".
Yes! Gotta love it.

So why does this thing exist? Ask the developer and he will say, so what if it's expensive, it's selling like hotcakes.

To a tenant it's a statement. Nothing screens out the riff raff like the brute power of money. And it might even make sense. If, say, a broker is able to rub shoulders with the right people down by the pool, the increased business might make the rent look like a good investment.

The broker's rich customers are trying to screen out posers and find people who effectively get things done. A broker who can afford a place like that must surely be effective at making money. You can only fake that for so long.

This is how big money creates it's own reality.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-29-2008, 07:02 PM
Chefguy Chefguy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 24,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaglavak View Post
Yes! Gotta love it.

So why does this thing exist? Ask the developer and he will say, so what if it's expensive, it's selling like hotcakes.

To a tenant it's a statement. Nothing screens out the riff raff like the brute power of money. And it might even make sense. If, say, a broker is able to rub shoulders with the right people down by the pool, the increased business might make the rent look like a good investment.

The broker's rich customers are trying to screen out posers and find people who effectively get things done. A broker who can afford a place like that must surely be effective at making money. You can only fake that for so long.

This is how big money creates it's own reality.
"Johnson Tower, Where All The Rich Pricks Hang Out"
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-29-2008, 09:49 PM
waterj2 waterj2 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chefguy View Post
"Johnson Tower, Where All The Rich Pricks Hang Out"
I'd say that "... who knows what opportunities might pop up" would better fit the, er, rather erect posture of the thing.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-30-2008, 02:51 AM
Happy Scrappy Hero Pup Happy Scrappy Hero Pup is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
Quote:
The broker's rich customers are trying to screen out posers and find people who effectively get things done. A broker who can afford a place like that must surely be effective at making money. You can only fake that for so long.
Well, sure, but there's a tipping point to that.

There are only so many such people, and if you build the building bigger than will fit ALL of them, then your price point is compromised.

You can't be an exclusive building if you're so big that the only way to recoup your construction costs is to lease to EVERYBODY.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-20-2009, 11:33 PM
Siam Sam Siam Sam is offline
Elephant Whisperer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 20,705
Lightning strikes the top of the Burj Dubai. See it here, here, here and here.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-21-2009, 02:48 AM
willthekittensurvive? willthekittensurvive? is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Wasn’t using Skyscrapers as giant acupuncture needles on global leylines the chief instrument of global domination for the old man of the mountain and his Hashshashin?

Or are we not allowed to talk about it?I keep forgetting
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-21-2009, 12:12 AM
Siam Sam Siam Sam is offline
Elephant Whisperer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 20,705
And now, the Burj Dubai is attracting BASE jumpers intent on setting a world record. There have already been successes. Video here.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-21-2009, 12:46 AM
Desert Nomad Desert Nomad is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colophon View Post
And really obsessive skyscraper geekiness and constant photo updates here.

(Link currently points to last page of 374-page thread. And I think that's the 28th thread or something stupid.)

It really is just quite ridiculously, insanely, ludicrously tall, and there are still several hundred feet of spire to go. It's tall.

I have to see this thing in the flesh one day.
I used to live 2km from it. It IS insanely tall. When it was only 60 floors or so it seemed like any other building, then at 100 or so it seemed well quite tall indeed, at 140 floors it was OMG tall.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 04-21-2009, 08:29 AM
jayjay jayjay is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
The Burj Dubai and this new planned 1km tower are what happens when you have too much money chasing too few goods...same thing with those manmade islands like the Palm Island and the giant world map. Dubai is insane with Spenditis.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-21-2009, 02:37 PM
Captain Lance Murdoch Captain Lance Murdoch is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaglavak View Post
Architects get all damp and fluttery over it, but from a money and utility angle it just doesn't pencil out. Rather odd and very Freudian.
Engineers maybe. Architects will likely treat it as an object of ridicule, like most of the stuff in Dubai.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-21-2009, 03:16 PM
Finagle Finagle is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Somewhere near Boston
Posts: 7,661
Is there any rationale for skyscrapers in Dubai? Is real estate at a premium? Looking at the skyline in the pictures, it doesn't seem as though they've really been forced to expand upwards for previous buildings. Granted, they are building huge artificial islands, but that could just be a desire for more beachfront property.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-21-2009, 03:33 PM
Really Not All That Bright Really Not All That Bright is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
Well, land values are high, but not, like, Manhattan/The City/Otemachi high. Certainly not high enough to require 150-floor office buildings.

There's rarely a rationale for a skyscraper of this type anyway. Neither downtown Kuala Lumpur or the Chicago Loop area boast particularly high land values. You could have built two Sears half-towers for much, much less than the price of one full-size one, or four half-Petronas Towers.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-22-2009, 08:51 AM
user_hostile user_hostile is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near KIAD
Posts: 1,555
I think I read about this in the Time/Life Science series of books in the 60's, that Manhattan was actually "lighter" since the earth being excavated down to the bedrock exceeded the weight of the buildings being thrown up.

On the other hand, the same series talked about all of the Chinese jumping off chairs and generating enormous tsunamis... which was literally the very first Straight Dope article I ever read and started me on Cecil's enlighten path.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.