The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-15-2009, 01:12 PM
statsman1982 statsman1982 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Probability question about aircraft rivets

A student emailed me a question on homework this morning, and after working out the solution for myself and checking the answer in the back of the book and finding it different from mine, I am worried that I am missing something. I hope someone can confirm my suspicion that the book's answer is wrong. Here goes:

Quote:
An aircraft seam requires 25 rivets. The seam will have to be reworked if any of these rivets is defective. Suppose rivets are defective independently of one another, each with the same probability p.

a). If 20% of all seams need reworking, what is the probability that a rivet is defective?
My solution:

P(seam needs rework) = P(>= 1 rivet is defective) = 1 - P(all rivets are fine) = 1 - (1 - p)^25.

Then set
1 - (1 - p)^25 = 0.2 and solve for p. One obtains p = 0.00889.

The book's answer is 0.06235.

I should note that Googling this problem results in solutions that lead to my answer, and that the problem is from a well-known textbook for engineering students that is now in its 7th edition. I can't find any errata for the textbook, so I have no idea if the solution in the back of the book is just in error.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 10-15-2009, 01:25 PM
Baracus Baracus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
It appears to me that you did it correctly. The answer the book gives seems to be if 20% of the seams did NOT need reworking.

(1-0.06235)^25 = 0.20 = probability that all the rivets are fine if p=0.06235
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-15-2009, 01:25 PM
MikeS MikeS is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Williamstown, MA
Posts: 3,051
If you plug p = 0.06235 into your formula (which I think is correct), you get a result of 80% of seams needing reworking rather than 20%. I'm going to go for a simple error on the publisher's or author's part.

ETA: <Maxwell Smart> Missed it by that much! </Maxwell Smart>

Last edited by MikeS; 10-15-2009 at 01:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.