The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-11-2010, 04:06 PM
LonghornDave LonghornDave is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
World's Richest Man - King Abdullah?

I don't really understand the methodology that Forbes uses to determine the World's Richest Man. Forbes recently came out with their revised list, which lists the richest man as Carlos Slim at $53.5 billion.

Separately, they, on occasion, do a list for the richest royals. Coming in at number 3 on that list is King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia at $21 billion.

Saudi Arabia is the owner of Saudi Aramco, which according to the Financial Times (subscription required) has a value of approximately $7 trillion. As the ruler of essentially a dictatorship, I can't possibly see how King Abdullah would only be worth around 0.3% of the value of his country. I realize this is an extremely simply analysis, and that I am essentially equating the value of Saudi Arabia with Saudi Aramco; however, I just don't understand how they can ascribe so little of the value of Aramco to Abdullah. Further, how does Forbes even come up with the net worth of $21 billion?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 03-12-2010, 06:23 AM
Candyman74 Candyman74 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Being a dictator of a country doesn't mean you have private ownership of everything within it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-12-2010, 06:36 AM
CutterJohn CutterJohn is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Yep. Dictators still rule by the sufferance of the people, its just that there is a much, much higher threshold of naughtiness required to be 'voted' out. Trying to say you own everything and nobody else owns anything is a good way to kick off a 'reelection'.

Its also a good way to seriously disrupt foreign investment in the country.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-12-2010, 06:49 AM
Alessan Alessan is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Bear in mind that rich people are only rich by the sufference of the governments controlling their assets. So it works both ways. After a certain point money stops being relevant, and it all becomes about power.

Last edited by Alessan; 03-12-2010 at 06:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-12-2010, 07:49 AM
spingears spingears is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
World's Richest Man - King Abdullah?

The current new is that it is a Mexican national who is heavily invested in the telecom industry.

Think "Carlos Slim"
__________________
Do nothing simply if a way can be found to make it complex and wonderful
spingears
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-12-2010, 09:43 AM
LonghornDave LonghornDave is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Candyman74 View Post
Being a dictator of a country doesn't mean you have private ownership of everything within it.
Sure. I'm not saying it does. However, the Saudi government is essentially the Saud family. Abdullah is the head of the family.

How does Forbes even come up with a net worth of $21 billion for Abdullah? It seems to me that his net worth is really however much he can get away with before there is a coup or revolution.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-12-2010, 09:52 AM
Mr. Excellent Mr. Excellent is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by LonghornDave View Post
Sure. I'm not saying it does. However, the Saudi government is essentially the Saud family. Abdullah is the head of the family.

How does Forbes even come up with a net worth of $21 billion for Abdullah? It seems to me that his net worth is really however much he can get away with before there is a coup or revolution.
To an extent, sure - if the King wanted to transfer additional assets from the state to his personal bank account, he could probably do so. However, at the moment he's got a certain bank account (or maybe several) that consist of "his" money, and other accounts that contain the Kingdom's funds. King Abdullah *could* become far more wealthy very quickly if he dipped into the till more - but that would harm his long-term prospects, so he doesn't. And I assume Forbes is just counting the money he has "on hand".
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-12-2010, 10:07 AM
md2000 md2000 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
I assume Aramco is organized like a real company and has shares, pays dividends, etc. True, the king could probably call them up and suggest they forward him a consulting fee of $X million without question, and probably has some sort of standing arrangement to do so. But he does not actually "own" Saudi Arabia or any assets of it. He just gets to tell them what to do with their assets. It's a fine distinction.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-12-2010, 10:13 AM
BrightNShiny BrightNShiny is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by spingears View Post
The current new is that it is a Mexican national who is heavily invested in the telecom industry.

Think "Carlos Slim"
Really? I thought the world's richest man was someone named Carlos Slim.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-12-2010, 06:46 PM
Candyman74 Candyman74 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Plus, of course, Forbes doesn't really know anyone's wealth. It's all estimates based on observation of visible assets, public information, etc. I'd guess - but don't know - that the public information available about Abdullah's wealth is less reliable than that available about, say, Bill Gates.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-12-2010, 10:36 PM
Lumpy Lumpy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota US
Posts: 10,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by spingears View Post
The current new is that it is a Mexican national who is heavily invested in the telecom industry.
For some strange reason, I was convinced this sentence had the word "trafficker" in it, and it took me several seconds to assure myself that it didn't.

Regarding rich monarchs, this made me think of a dilemma I ran into when I was contemplating writing a science fiction story. The premise was that someone developed a secret and exclusive means of reversing aging. Given that this was now the most valuable thing in the world, the controllers of the process maximized their revenue by offering it to the mega-rich for an extremely steep price: 90% of their entire worth. What I couldn't figure out was how the price would be determined for dictators and hereditary monarchs, who couldn't exactly share or liquidate the source of their wealth.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-12-2010, 11:39 PM
Carptracker Carptracker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
What's up with that name anyway? How can the richest guy in the world be named Carlos Slim. Sounds like a pool shark. Or maybe the skinny cowboy that gets killed in the first scene.
Or a muscian who is confused about what genre of music he plays.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-13-2010, 12:36 AM
njtt njtt is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carptracker View Post
What's up with that name anyway? How can the richest guy in the world be named Carlos Slim. Sounds like a pool shark. Or maybe the skinny cowboy that gets killed in the first scene.
Or a muscian who is confused about what genre of music he plays.
Actually, his name is Carlos Slim Helú, but he appears to like to be called Slim. He actually seems to be fairly chubby.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-13-2010, 01:10 AM
AK84 AK84 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
1) Abdullah is a King not a Dictator.

2) If he starts doing what is suggested and says "all mine", well it will last as long as it takes for the senior Princes to explain to His Majesty why he is abdicating.......with immediet effect.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-13-2010, 07:51 AM
Johanna Johanna is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Altered States of America
Posts: 10,962
Carlos's second and third names come from Arabic. Slim < سَليم salīm 'safe and sound'; Helú < حِلْو ḥilw 'sweet'.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-13-2010, 08:01 AM
ivan astikov ivan astikov is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Manchestuh, UK.
Posts: 7,879
I asked this in the "Who would make a great Bond villain" thread and didn't get a response, but I guess it is more appropriate here -
Quote:
This thread has made me wonder - is Forbes the definitive guide to the richest people on Earth, or are there likely to be people who say to Forbes, "You print my name in that rag of yours and I'll buy it and make sure there is never a Forbes Rich List again. Kapiche?"?
How many 'unknown' billionaires are there likely to be? Is it possible to make a billion and stay beneath the radar of all but the select few?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-14-2010, 01:36 AM
chorpler chorpler is online now
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vegas, baby!
Posts: 3,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrightNShiny View Post
Really? I thought the world's richest man was someone named Carlos Slim.
You're thinking of his brother Barbados.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.