I just got back* from the midnight showing of Let Me In and I declare to you now, it’s GOOD! Very very good. Could be among the best movies of the year. Could be. I was a huge whining naysayer when I heard that they were remaking the movie Let The Right One In, and I am so happy to report that I was wrong, wrong, wrong as wrong could be in my hyperbolic predictions.
The Swedish film is a wonderful, wonderful film. It will always have a special place in my heart, and no movie could possibly be better. But, if you set the Swedish film up on a pedestal, but then move that pedestal out of your field of vision, and watch the American version as its own entity, it rates high.
Almost everything that made the original movie so good is there in the remake, all but Kåre Hedebrant as Oskar and Lina Leandersson as Eli. But Kodi Smit-McPhee and Chloe Moretz make the characters their own, and do a wonderful job. At its core it’s a story about friendship between outsiders, and the two have definite chemistry.
The movie is dark, chilly, quiet, brooding, creepy, scary, sweet (in a twisted way) and gory. It really is a remake of the Swedish movie, almost shot-for-shot more often than not, not an adaptation of the book as I’d hoped, but I didn’t mind. I love both versions now.
For those who’ve seen the Swedish original, please give this a chance and don’t be too hard on it because it’s not the Swedish movie.
For those who haven’t seen the Swedish original, please watch this, but then watch the Swedish original too.
I suppose a lot of people are sick of vampires now, but these two films are worth seeing because of their unusual point of view.
A few spoilers ONLY for those who have seen the Swedish original:
[spoiler]They kept in the fact that Abby’s a boy. She tells Owen so, twice. Later, they show Owen looking at Abby naked and you see the realization that she was telling the truth on his face, but unlike the Swedish version, they don’t show Abby’s castration scar.
The biggest differences come from The Father’s scenes, how he stalks and kills, how he comes to pour acid on his face and such. The opening is different, starting with the ambulance taking The Father to the hospital and what happens to him there, and sets the movie up as a flashback leading up to that point from two weeks earlier. Richard Jenkins barely says a word, but he gives the character much more of a creepy poignancy than in the Swedish version. Just as in the Swedish version, it’s never explained who he is.
It’s set in 1983 btw. It’s winter too, and the cold, while not quite the character it was in the Swedish version, is still pretty potent for many scenes. [/spoiler]
I’d write more but I’m so tired. It’s a good thing I don’t have to work today.
I hope it does well. There weren’t very many people in the theater.
Edit to add, I got back earlier, and started this post, but got distracted reading reviews of the movie.