Today, as I was changing channels on my DVR, I realized that the speed of changing channels is something that got quantifiably worse compared to the past.
Yes, of course, now we have HD content, and a DVR allows you to do stuff that you could never do before, but on this one metric (speed of changing the channel), modern technology is worse than what we had 20 years ago.
The job market for college graduates has tanked along with the economy.
The value of the dollar went a lot further. Even if minimum wage was only a buck or 2, the amount of stuff you could buy on minimum wage was much larger.
I’m asking for opinions for things that can be quantified, e.g. how much faster or more expensive something is, to which you can assign a specific non-subjective value (e.g. 3 seconds faster, 10% more expensive)
ETA: To clarify, I’m not asking you guys to actually quantify the change, just report on things what have gotten worse in a quantifiable, non-subjective, way,
This. To quantify it, more seat room, less waiting time, and meals that were sometimes even good meals.
For another, before the Internet and web it was difficult to take work home with you, so you had possibly an hour or more to relax or at least not worry about work than you do today.
I’m not sure how quantifiable this is, but most movie theaters sold you a ticket for admission, not a particular movie. There were double features, but even if there were not you could stay and see the movie twice if you wished to.
Well, neither is your channel-changing example, unless you can prove that “faster” is “better”
In the coke example, something has changed quantifiably: sugar has been replaced with corn syrup, just as, in your channel-changing example, faster has been replaced with slower. Whether that change is better or worse is entirely subjective.
There was also a long period where they didn’t show commercials. Now after the projector starts you have to wait through commercials even before the previews start.