The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Great Debates

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-23-2012, 05:38 PM
2sense 2sense is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Bicameralism in Senegal

Senegal has eliminated it's Senate. While we've gone back and forth on the merits of bicameralism many times here in GD what interested me was the manner in which this was accomplished. The National Assembly passed the law to abolish the Senate but the Senate did not. The bill was then approved on a joint ballot of the 150 members of the Assembly and 100 members of the Senate. The joint ballot is an interesting mechanism. It allows the benefit of having a 2nd legislative chamber, more consideration of measures, while limiting obstructionism in cases where measures are popular in the larger legislative body. Of course, given the current disparity in the size of the houses of Congress here at home a joint ballot would tilt the balance of power toward the lower house far more than it did in Senegal.
__________________
Just my 2sense
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 09-23-2012, 09:10 PM
Ruken Ruken is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 1,865
Interesting. Do you have any information on why they went about this? Perhaps some links? I don't know much about Senegal other than where it is on a map.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-23-2012, 09:52 PM
2sense 2sense is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Supposedly it was done to save money. But the Senate was filled with members of the opposition party so there was political motivation. Apparently nearly all of the Senators were supporters of the former president and the institution had a reputation for corruption.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-...to-save-money/

http://www.theafricareport.com/west-...eputation.html
__________________
Just my 2sense
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-24-2012, 03:41 AM
Malden Capell Malden Capell is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
The 'joint session' is used in Australia as well, although only once in history I believe.

Ah yes, 1974: Link

The joint session allows members of both Houses to engage directly, but as the Lower House is numerically larger it means the advantage is with the Lower House at all times.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-25-2012, 12:25 AM
2sense 2sense is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Again we are looking at less of a disparity than we have here in America at the federal level. Australia had 127 members of the lower house compared to 60 from the upper. In our Congress the 435 Representatives can swamp the 100 Senators. The House Majority having at least a 50 seat majority is pretty common.
__________________
Just my 2sense
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-25-2012, 07:58 PM
Really Not All That Bright Really Not All That Bright is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
Are we talking about having Congress vote jointly, or disbanding the Senate?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.