The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Cafe Society

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-03-2012, 08:54 PM
jmoney_84 jmoney_84 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Can you tell me who the pornstar on the left is?

NSFW link:

I know the woman on the right is Kelly Madison. But who's on the left side?

Last edited by twickster; 12-04-2012 at 10:38 AM.. Reason: added NSFW warning and spoiler box to comply with our two-click rule
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 12-03-2012, 08:59 PM
Joey P Joey P is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 21,611
Google Image Search says Eva Notty.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-03-2012, 09:00 PM
panache45 panache45 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NE Ohio (the 'burbs)
Posts: 22,926
There are only 2 in that pic? I'm seeing 4.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-03-2012, 09:02 PM
Joey P Joey P is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 21,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by panache45 View Post
There are only 2 in that pic? I'm seeing 4.
Move your face away from the monitor and clean the drool off of it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-03-2012, 09:13 PM
beowulff beowulff is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Scottsdale, more-or-less
Posts: 10,965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey P View Post
Move your face away from the monitor and clean the drool off of it.
Boy, have you got the wrong guy for that comment...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-03-2012, 09:38 PM
Colibri Colibri is offline
SD Curator of Critters
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Panama
Posts: 25,988
Questions about cinema go in Cafe Society.

Colibri
General Questions Moderator
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-03-2012, 10:01 PM
Chefguy Chefguy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 29,207
Don't know either one, but they're both grotesque.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-03-2012, 10:09 PM
beowulff beowulff is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Scottsdale, more-or-less
Posts: 10,965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chefguy View Post
Don't know either one, but they're both grotesque.
This is obviously some strange usage of the word "grotesque" that I hadn't previously been aware of.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-03-2012, 10:32 PM
standingwave standingwave is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey P View Post
Google Image Search says Eva Notty.
Much as smart phones did for bar debates, Google Image Search (and TinEye) are ruining Internet debates.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-03-2012, 10:46 PM
Joey P Joey P is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 21,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by standingwave View Post
Much as smart phones did for bar debates, Google Image Search (and TinEye) are ruining Internet debates.
As much as I hate it when (for example) someone poses a question such as "Can anyone help me come up with a list of [obscure something or other]?" and we all have fun for a few posts trying to work it out until someone posts a link with exactly what the OP was asking for...this wasn't really a debate.

But I get what you're saying. I wish I could think of a concrete example or come up with a thread where someone plastered a link in the 10th post when the thread was just starting to get interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-03-2012, 11:02 PM
GuanoLad GuanoLad is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Where the wild roses grow
Posts: 19,948
Skank McSkankersen?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-03-2012, 11:13 PM
Kobal2 Kobal2 is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by standingwave View Post
Much as smart phones did for bar debates, Google Image Search (and TinEye) are ruining Internet debates.
Smart phones ruin nothing - they simply shift the debate from <whatever factoid is adamantly defended by either party> to <can Wikipedia/FactCheckers/TheStraightDope be trusted ?> to <What is trust ? What is truth, maaan ?> to even more fundamental ontological horizons. Or, depending on the state of the beer pitcher, lead to a violent row with Siri.

Either way, still entertaining.

(Anecdote: I once actually had a drunken row with a GPS navigator. The blasted thing kept saying to keep going forward when I knew full well we shoulda turned left right there, it was my fuckin' neighbourhood fer chrissakes.
I don't recall who won the argument in the end, however. I woke up in my bed, so it musta been me, on account of the piece of shit was trying to get us lost !)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-03-2012, 11:30 PM
panache45 panache45 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NE Ohio (the 'burbs)
Posts: 22,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey P View Post
Move your face away from the monitor and clean the drool off of it.
Never assume . . . .
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-03-2012, 11:34 PM
Joey P Joey P is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 21,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by panache45 View Post
Never assume . . . .
If it wasn't meant to be a joke...then I'm not seeing 4 pornstars in the linked picture, just 2.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-03-2012, 11:56 PM
Disheavel Disheavel is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
[Deleted as it wasn't funny]

Last edited by Disheavel; 12-03-2012 at 11:58 PM.. Reason: I couldn't find the correct onomatopoeia for "whooshing through bossoms"
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-04-2012, 12:24 AM
PlainJain PlainJain is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuanoLad View Post
Skank McSkankersen?
I think it's Skank McTramperson.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-04-2012, 12:24 AM
Snerky Snerk Snerky Snerk is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by panache45 View Post
There are only 2 in that pic? I'm seeing 4.
Maybe you're having a stroke.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-04-2012, 12:27 AM
Robot Arm Robot Arm is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by beowulff View Post
This is obviously some strange usage of the word "grotesque" that I hadn't previously been aware of.
If some is good, more is not always better.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-04-2012, 12:36 AM
Kamino Neko Kamino Neko is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey P View Post
If it wasn't meant to be a joke...then I'm not seeing 4 pornstars in the linked picture, just 2.
It's a tit joke, dude.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-04-2012, 07:28 AM
beowulff beowulff is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Scottsdale, more-or-less
Posts: 10,965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robot Arm View Post
If some is good, more is not always better.
Sure, some people don't like big boobs.
I get it.
But even so, that doesn't make them "grotesque."
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-04-2012, 07:34 AM
kayaker kayaker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 15,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colibri View Post
Questions about cinema go in Cafe Society.
Todaloo, I'm off for the cinema Lovey.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-04-2012, 09:12 AM
CarnalK CarnalK is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by beowulff View Post
Sure, some people don't like big boobs.
I get it.
But even so, that doesn't make them "grotesque."
One definition of grotesque is "strangely or fantastically distorted". Even if you like big boobs, these particular 4 boobs have indeed been implanted to grotesque levels.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-04-2012, 10:51 AM
Vinyl Turnip Vinyl Turnip is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: <--- <--- <---
Posts: 15,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey P View Post
Move your face away from the monitor and clean the drool off of it.
That's not his face. And that's not drool.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-04-2012, 11:45 AM
DarkFire DarkFire is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarnalK View Post
One definition of grotesque is "strangely or fantastically distorted". Even if you like big boobs, these particular 4 boobs have indeed been implanted to grotesque levels.
I err..had a friend. Yes, we'll go with friend.. do some research and he says the boobs of Eva Notty are NOT implants. And as far as he knows, ditto for the other woman. It's the bra that's deforming them.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-04-2012, 12:34 PM
standingwave standingwave is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkFire View Post
I err..had a friend. Yes, we'll go with friend.. do some research and he says the boobs of Eva Notty are NOT implants. And as far as he knows, ditto for the other woman. It's the bra that's deforming them.
According to Boobpedia (never thought I'd be writing those words here), a wiki for big boobs, neither lady has implants. Staff, true? The site is moderately NSFW, seemingly containing just one softcore picture per page, but primarily it's just textual biographical information. (Now I know how I'll be spending the rest of the day.)

Kelly Madison
SPOILER:
Kelly Madison
Born: August 26, 1967 (age 45) Newport Beach, California
Years active: 2001-present
Measurements: 34FF-26-34 in
Bra/cup size: 34G (75G) (same as FF cup)
Boobs: Natural


Eva Notty
SPOILER:

Eva Notty
Born: July 7, 1982 (age 30) Tucson, Arizona
Years active: 2004-present
Measurements: 40-28-34
Bra/cup size: 34J (75J)
Boobs: Natural

Last edited by twickster; 12-06-2012 at 04:13 PM.. Reason: added spoiler boxes
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-04-2012, 12:50 PM
Joey P Joey P is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 21,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by standingwave View Post
According to Boobpedia
Well there goes the rest of the workday.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-04-2012, 12:54 PM
Labrador Deceiver Labrador Deceiver is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
It's nothing but naked women. How the hell is that "moderately" not safe for work?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-04-2012, 01:02 PM
Nzinga, Seated Nzinga, Seated is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkFire View Post
I err..had a friend. Yes, we'll go with friend.. do some research and he says the boobs of Eva Notty are NOT implants. And as far as he knows, ditto for the other woman. It's the bra that's deforming them.
Yeah, those boobs look real. They sit real in the bras, and the arm size of the ladies are not the stick thin arms of some women who buy huge implants.

I wouldn't say the bras are deforming the boobs though. They look great to me.

Last edited by Nzinga, Seated; 12-04-2012 at 01:02 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-04-2012, 01:26 PM
kayaker kayaker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 15,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by Labrador Deceiver View Post
It's nothing but naked women. How the hell is that "moderately" not safe for work?
Depends where ya work, I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-04-2012, 03:31 PM
standingwave standingwave is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by kayaker View Post
Depends where ya work, I guess.
This.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 12-04-2012, 03:38 PM
Irishman Irishman is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Subscribing to review later.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kobal2 View Post
(Anecdote: I once actually had a drunken row with a GPS navigator. The blasted thing kept saying to keep going forward when I knew full well we shoulda turned left right there, it was my fuckin' neighbourhood fer chrissakes.
I don't recall who won the argument in the end, however. I woke up in my bed, so it musta been me, on account of the piece of shit was trying to get us lost !)
One time used someone's GPS to find my brother's house. I knew if I went on up the road a ways, I could turn right on a thoroughfare, then make a left into a neighborhood. And I knew the street names. Had even looked on a map. But thought I'd use the GPS. Damn thing took me on an early right into a different neighborhood, then an odd right on a side street, wandered around, a detour left, a curve through another street, a couple more wandering turns, and finally came out of that neighborhood at the light on the thoroughfare I had mentioned. Across from the turn. It had apparently wandered me around on a separate instance of the street with the same name that was not connected to the bit I wanted. It might or might not have been closer as the crow flies, but it sure wasn't closer or faster by the actual route.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-04-2012, 07:22 PM
JoseB JoseB is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishman View Post
One time used someone's GPS to find my brother's house. I knew if I went on up the road a ways, I could turn right on a thoroughfare, then make a left into a neighborhood. And I knew the street names. Had even looked on a map. But thought I'd use the GPS. Damn thing took me on an early right into a different neighborhood, then an odd right on a side street, wandered around, a detour left, a curve through another street, a couple more wandering turns, and finally came out of that neighborhood at the light on the thoroughfare I had mentioned. Across from the turn. It had apparently wandered me around on a separate instance of the street with the same name that was not connected to the bit I wanted. It might or might not have been closer as the crow flies, but it sure wasn't closer or faster by the actual route.
Sometimes the problem lies in how the map data have been codified in the GPS software. I have found that my GPS wants to take me the wrong way through streets that are only one-way, or through bicycle lanes. I guess that there *will* be mistakes there.

And I am amazed at how a discussion about bounteous breastitude has been transformed into a talk on the accuracy of GPS receivers ...
__________________
NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-04-2012, 10:55 PM
BigT BigT is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kamino Neko View Post
It's a tit joke, dude.
Which still seems to depend on panache being straight for it to make sense.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-04-2012, 11:04 PM
Smapti Smapti is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 6,453
Only on the Dope could a thread about boobies get hijacked into anecdotes about GPS problems.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-05-2012, 12:55 AM
Irishman Irishman is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Well, I was posting from work.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-05-2012, 01:57 AM
standingwave standingwave is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nzinga, Seated View Post
Yeah, those boobs look real. They sit real in the bras, and the arm size of the ladies are not the stick thin arms of some women who buy huge implants.

I wouldn't say the bras are deforming the boobs though. They look great to me.
I don't mind seeing seeing women who don't appear to be on the verge of starvation.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-05-2012, 02:08 AM
Voyager Voyager is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Deep Space
Posts: 34,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snerky Snerk View Post
Maybe you're having a stroke.
I'm sure he is.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-05-2012, 02:09 AM
Voyager Voyager is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Deep Space
Posts: 34,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey P View Post
Well there goes the rest of the workday.
It has a category Writers. Sure they're pushing that definition, including Sarah Palin, but it is nice to be surprised by the web after all these years.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-05-2012, 09:05 AM
Nars Glinley Nars Glinley is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey P View Post
Google Image Search says Eva Notty.
With a name like that, the poor girl never had a chance.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-05-2012, 09:22 AM
Kamino Neko Kamino Neko is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigT View Post
Which still seems to depend on panache being straight for it to make sense.
No, I'm pretty sure gay guys know what tits are, and how many of them are to the average set.

Last edited by Kamino Neko; 12-05-2012 at 09:22 AM.. Reason: homophone trouble.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 12-06-2012, 09:30 AM
ministryman ministryman is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
I was going to say it's Tits McGee, but I see the mystery had been solved.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 12-06-2012, 10:21 AM
Vinyl Turnip Vinyl Turnip is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: <--- <--- <---
Posts: 15,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by standingwave View Post
I don't mind seeing seeing women who don't appear to be on the verge of starvation.
Welcome to paradise!
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 12-06-2012, 10:25 AM
panache45 panache45 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NE Ohio (the 'burbs)
Posts: 22,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigT View Post
Which still seems to depend on panache being straight for it to make sense.
I'm not. But I know how to count to 4.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 12-06-2012, 11:18 AM
Kimballkid Kimballkid is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
And it can be done with his free hand!!

(Would work better if panache45 were straight.)
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 12-06-2012, 01:10 PM
Irishman Irishman is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
The joke appears to be that each of the tits is a star in its own right, purposely confusing tits vs people in the picture. Doesn't require anyone to be straight.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 12-06-2012, 01:22 PM
Kimballkid Kimballkid is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
If that was directed at me, I meant the counting to 4 part.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 12-06-2012, 04:16 PM
twickster twickster is online now
Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 38,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by standingwave View Post
The site is moderately NSFW, seemingly containing just one softcore picture per page, but primarily it's just textual biographical information.
For the record, pictures of women with ginormous boobs who are not wearing clothing from the waist up should be considered NSFW, whether or not their nipples are visible.

I added spoiler boxes to two links to make them comply with our two-click rule, and broke the third.

Last edited by twickster; 12-06-2012 at 04:19 PM.. Reason: fixed coding
Reply With Quote
Reply



Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.