I agree Jeff was lame-brained, and a discount of, say, 50% seems OK. But I find the whole story astounding! These chubby ladies are now “emotionally scarred” ?? :smack: The manager offered them $13 off; did they call the news station just to make sure they got another $13 ? :smack:
Part of my confusion may be due to some other cultures (e.g. Thai) being much more candid than Americans. I’ve a slight pot-belly, and often have people I barely know asking if I’ve been drinking too much beer … or even ask how many months pregnant I am!
I’m not surprised that waitstaff could and do have all sorts of possibly rude nicknames for customers among themselves. But writing it on the bill crosses the line to being offensive to the customer. Simple as that.
Besides, it’s stupid. What if another table of “fat girls” came in? Why not just label the tables with numbers? Table 18 is Table 18 no matter who sits there.
Finally, on the art of being rude: if Jeff was gonna be a jerk, he might as well go all the way. When they complained about the bill being labeled “Fat Girls”, he should have apologized profusely, then given them a corrected bill with a discount reading “Fat Women”.
That’s when you devise a spectrum of measurement wherein these particular fat girls are point 0 on the scale and base all future descriptions off them.
I don’t think that compensation will be forthcoming, and most likely there will be more support for the restaurant than for them. As anyone can see, they are fat. There’s no obvious malice to it, just a mistake by a moron.
As far as getting to be on TV, well, I’ve never really understood that desire.
Contrition and an evident desire to make things right with their annoyed customers lets them avoid bad publicity. Stockton, CA is one of the most obese cities in the country. If I ran a cheeseburger-and-fries type restaurant there, I sure as hell wouldn’t want a reputation of being shitty to fat customers.