In looking at 18th century American writing, you notice a lot of differences in vocabulary, grammar, and character formation that we no longer use. For one, the usage of that weird “s” in the middle of words that looks like an “f”. Fine. It was a stupid idea, so it’s good that it died out.
However, one thing has always puzzled me. Writers back then used the character “&” to mean “and”. Howcum? And howcum this usage died out? I mean, you might use it in, say, a company name like “Smith & Jones”, but big-time usage has died out…You never see “We went to the movies & had a nice time”. What’s up with that?
In the 18th century, all type was set by hand. The use of &, №, and lots of abbreviations sped up the process of setting the type for broadsheets, newspapers, pamphlets, and books. People who wrote in longhand often copied the style tht they were used to reading from printed texts.
With the invention of the mechanical typesetters, such as linotype, which allowed the setting of a character with the strike of a keystroke, the “need” for such shortcuts was reduced and the style swung away from abbreviations and toward fully expanded words. (Ironically, a change in the approach toward headline usage worked in the opposite direction. Originally, newpapers summarized their stories in a series of descending font sizes, with each summary providing more detail in smaller type. Then someone figured that a single bold headline would capture the attention of more readers (a serious consideration in the day when many cities had multiple newspapers competing for readership on open newsstands). They changed the format to give each story a single bold headline that needed to be as short and snappy as possible, so the format changed to one of slang terms and abbreviations in the headlines at about the same time that the stories were beginning to use extended spelling.
The ampersand is still used in many applications. I don’t think the OP was asking why it had disappeared completely (which it has not) but why it does not often appear in the body of standard text, such as in newspaper articles, novels, and essays.
The current symbols found on most U.S. (PC?) keyboards are (showing the shift value above the non-shift key):
Really old U.S. manual typewriters had the U.S. ¢ above the 6, and had no exclamation point (or numeral 1–we used the lower case l which always came in a serif font). There were no tildes, grave accents, braces, or brackets, either. (We made the exclamation point by typing a single quote, then backspacing and typing a period on the same character space.) Of course, different manufacturers placed different characters on different keys throughout the 100 years of pre-IBM Selectric typewriters, so other combinations are possible.
That’s a good question about “¢”. Inflation may well be the answer. I would guess that once upon a time giving ones 2¢ worth (as in an opinion) really meant something, whereas nowadays it means something along the lines of “here’s my opinion but it’s not really worth much so don’t pay too much attention to me”.
It depends on what you’re reading. Symbols like this (including numbers) are a kind of shorthand and may not always be appropriate in formal writing. I use them all the time in notes to myself, places where space is an issue, & places where style doesn’t matter
I would just as quickly use other symbols in place of words as long as I knew my writing style wasn’t going to be judged by the reader. Regard:
6 laptops @ $2000 (as opposed to) Six laptops at two thousand dollars each.
Left message for customer with telephone & incident #'s.
I read somewhere (probably on this very board) that the cents sign lost out to the caret symbol when computers came into being because programmers needed this character more than the cents sign.
I’d also like to add that the older U.S. typewriters did not have a zero key, either. This was merely substituted with the letter O. My dad still has an old Underwood typewriter with no 0 or 1 key.
I can’t let this slide. Why was it a stupid idea? Stupid because it isn’t something that you are used too, or is there another reason? There also used to be a letter that was essentially a combination of ‘T’ and ‘H’, but we don’t see that anymore even though I would not call it a stupid idea, in fact I think that it is a pretty good idea. Language, both spoken and writen, are in a constant state of change.
Attrayant got it, for my money. Nobody ever uses & in actual sentences, it’s used for shorthand. Slightly more formal than @ for at, less so than # for number.
It’s used all the time in computing to mean “and”, especially if you do any bit operations in C.
The history of the roman alphabet and of typography is one of the few subjects I’m somewhat useful in, but it seems that most matters in here have been concisely dealt with.
The ampersand has had an interesting history, and appears in many forms. The form I’m filling in right now has a different form of the & than in the general text of this page. The one right here looks much like an eight with two appendages. The one in the text looks much closer to its origin in latin Et. As tomndebb said, closer to the age of Johann Gutenberg, space was filled (paper was expensive) by using ligatures. Wait–does the ampersand count as a ligature, or does it only refer to those such and fl, fi, &c seen in books? For whatever reason, the & still hangs around.
It’s definately not disappeared. I see it often in hand-written notes, often in the form of a rounded, crossed E. Usually, I will simply use the + sign. *Am I wrong, or is this more common in Germany? This movie *came to mind.
Adam Yax, I believe the character you’re thinking of is the thorn: þ I hope it doesn’t only show up on my computer.
Speaking of which, tomndebb: I can’t see that symbol after your &.
I can’t see it now, either. It is (was) the abbreviation “No” with the o raised in superscript and underlined. It worked in Preview, but failed on post. I used it as an example of the 18th century habit of posting many common specialty words in that format (underscored superscripts). (For those who are interested, it is Unicode 2116.)
The ampersand as displayed on this Message Board appears as & - which is a somewhat uncommon style (at least to me). For a moment, I thought this thread was about some character other than the ampersand.
A quick look through a font list www.1728.com/fontlttr.htm shows that this is the Trebuchet font for the ampersand.
& - Trebuchet
& - Arial Font
The latter is the ampersand in a style with which we are more familiar. It is the style that is used on the actual ‘7’ key on typewriter and computer keyboards.
In my twenty odd years of schooling, when I would be taking notes, I would often borrow words from other languages if the word was shorter than its English equivalent. I routinely used ‘et’ for ‘and’ until I learned Spanish, and then I used ‘y’.
