I’m not going to give reddit a look myself, but I’m slightly curious.
How far down the “thread” or whatever they call it did you have to go before seeing Hunter Biden accused of being the knife man? With Dad’s knowledge and connivance.
IIRC, Colorado has a law that gives a “suspect” certain legal rights. As a result, the Colorado police are unwilling to name suspects.
That was my point. There will be a painful reminder of their child’s death every Thanksgiving and Christmas .
I only skimmed through a couple hundred posts and, not, nothing even remotely political mentioned. Just your standard Internet sleuthing and rumormongering. Is it the neighbor? The ex? A random frat bro? Someone else? But, no, no Biden. I mean, it’s Reddit, not 4chan.
There’s growing concern the police may have compromised the crime scene. It’s a small department and they don’t have the training. What police did when they first entered the house is crucial.
It seems likely the suspect would have cut himself during the attacks. The knife handle gets slippery. DNA would be extremely helpful.
Hunters field dress their game without a problem. And bedrooms are full of bed linen.
I’m starting to wonder about the ex-boyfriend. he was called repeatedly that night which links him by activity. There’s a jealousy angle, he would know the layout of the house, and he probably has the entry code.
Stabbing people to death and field dressing game have just about nothing in common. Sure, I have no experience with the former but I’ve done the latter hundreds of times.
Also, blood on linen is called DNA evidence.
Did you cut yourself in the hundreds of times dressing game? If the answer is no then you would leave no DNA evidence.
When I skin a deer it isn’t typically fighting back and I’m not stressed out trying to kill it.
Again, do you cut yourself in the process? Do you see any scenario where you cut yourself? The chances of the killer doing this AND law enforcement separating out the DNA from a pool of blood is virtually non-existent. They would have to sample every drop of blood and somehow separate out what is what.
I have cut myself plenty of times dressing game, especially when I didn’t have all that much experience, or when especially tired, rushed etc. Even then, the environment & the process, inside one’s head and outside it, is NOTHING like murdering several people with a knife.
I’d estimate the chances of a quadruple knife killer on a spree cutting herself in the process are way above 50 %, maybe even around 90 %.
On a crime scene multiple samples are taken, precisely to catch possible leads. This isn’t the 1800’s, where none’s the wiser when facing a bunch a bloody sheets.
50 to 90% chance of blood sample from the killer should make solving this easy. Maybe an artist rendition of the likely places cut should be broadcast. Once they announce how many quarts of blood they’re testing we’ll be able to calculate how long the process will take. Hopefully none of the blood mixes.
I am beginning to fear this killer may have gotten away with it. Only 50% or so of US homicides are resolved.
Well, if they figure out who killed 2 of them… 
Your question leads me to believe you don’t understand what point people are trying to make about a person cutting themself in the process of committing a homicide with a knife. I handle a sharp knife almost daily and I rarely cut myself. But I typically use a knife under very controlled low stress situations. When I use a sharp knife to remove the silverskin from a rack of ribs, to cube some beef for stew, or to slice some carrots I have full control over whatever object I’m slicing or stabbing. But even with that control, on rare occasion I still manage to cut myself from time-to-time.
Self-inflicted wounds incurred while attacking someone with a knife is not uncommon. Think about it, the attacker is under a great deal of stress violently stabbing or swinging a sharpened piece of metal against a defender who is often fighting back. You can easily find multiple articles via Google on wounds sustained by the attacker during a knife attack.
You’re making a facile argument here. Yes, both activities involve a knife, but attackign someone with a knife is very, very different form field dressing a deer. You make a valid point about the DNA though. Assuming the killer left some of their blood behind, it might be impossible to separate it from the victims’ blood.
If the probability is really high then we might get lucky with a small isolated blood stain. I think we all agree it would be great if it was from a self inflicted blood stain sample. Personally, If it’s solved I expect it will involve a connection of electronic dots. Credit cards, phone tracks, security cameras etc…
I find this highly unlikely. Small town, small school. It’ll get solved. Probably won’t be much of a shock when they find out who did it and why.
Seems awfully soon to make that call.
If this was TV about now we’d start suspecting that the Mayor’s or Police Chief’s kid did it.
There have been cases involving bloody fatal stabbing scenes where the killer’s DNA was identified, separate from that of the victim.
One way in which this occurs is when the killer has cut himself and drips blood, either on the way to the bathroom to clean up or while exiting. Low-velocity drips tend to form characteristic patterns that differ from those of blood cast off during a struggle.
Some explanation here.